Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 412-430

  Borgman, Christine L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034345041     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000007121     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Meadows, A.J. Communication in science. London: Butterworth, 1974.
2. Meadows, A.J. Communicating research. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998.
3. Borgman, C.L. Bibliometrics and scholarly communication: editor's introduction. Communication Research, 16(4), 1989, 583-599. (Special issue on bibliometric techniques for the study of scholarly communication)
4. Borgman, C.L., ed. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
5. Garvey, W.D. Communication: the essence of science. New York: Pergamon, 1979.
6. Lievrouw, L.A. Reconciling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In: Borgman, C.L., ed. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990, 59-69.
7. Paisley, W. Communication in the communication sciences. In: Dervin, B. and Voigt, M., eds. Progress in the communication sciences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1984.
8. Whitley, R.D. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
9. Borgman, C.L. Editor's introduction. In: Borgman, C.L., ed. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990, 10-27.
10. Compton, B. Scientific communication. In: Pool, I. et al., eds. Handbook of communication. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973, 755-778.
11. Crane, D. Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 6, 1971, 1-39.
12. Crane, D. Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.
13. Garvey, W.D. and Griffith, B.C. Scientific information exchange in psychology. Science, 146(3652), 1964, 1655-1659.
14. Paisley, W.J. Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 3, 1968, 1-30.
15. White, H.D. Author co-citation analysis: overview and defense. In: Borgman, C.L., ed. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990, 84-106.
16. White, H.D. and McCain, K.W. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 1998, 327-355.
17. Lyman, P. Digital documents and the future of the academic community. In: Ekman, R. and Quandt, R.E., eds. Technology and scholarly communication. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999, 366-379.
18. Cummings, A.M., et al. University libraries and scholarly communication: a study prepared for the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 1992.
19. Hawkins, B.L. and Battin, P., eds. The mirage of continuity: reconfiguring academic information resources for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources and the Association of American Universities, 1998.
20. Lamm, D.S. Libraries and publishers: a partnership at risk. Daedalus, 125(4), 1996, 127-146. Special issue: Books, bricks, and bytes. Republished in: Graubard, S.R. and LeClerc, P., eds. Books, bricks, and bytes: libraries in the twenty-first century. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1998.
21. Lamm, D.S. Libraries and publishers: a partnership at risk. Daedalus, 125(4), 1996, 127-146. Special issue: Books, bricks, and bytes. Republished in: Graubard, S.R. and LeClerc, P., eds. Books, bricks, and bytes: libraries in the twenty-first century. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1998.
22. Okerson, A.S. Buy or lease? Two models for scholarly information at the end (or the beginning) of an era. Daedalus, 125(4), 1996, 55-76. Special issue: Books, bricks, and bytes. Republished in: Graubard, S.R. and LeClerc, P., eds. Books, bricks, and bytes: libraries in the twenty-first century. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1998.
23. Okerson, A.S. Buy or lease? Two models for scholarly information at the end (or the beginning) of an era. Daedalus, 125(4), 1996, 55-76. Special issue: Books, bricks, and bytes. Republished in: Graubard, S.R. and LeClerc, P., eds. Books, bricks, and bytes: libraries in the twenty-first century. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1998.
24. Pew Foundation. To publish and perish. 1998. http://www.arl.org/scomm/ pew/pewrept.html (visited 6 March 2000).
25. Kling, R. and McKim, G. Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 1999, 890-906.
26. Borgman, C.L. What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Information Processing & Management, 38(3), 1999, 227-243. Special issue: Progress toward digital libraries.
27. Borgman, C.L. From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: access to information in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
28. Bishop, A.P. and Star, S.L. Social informatics for digital library use and infrastructure. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31, 1996, 301-401.
29. Chowdhury, G.G. and Chowdhury, S. Digital library research: major issues and trends. Journal of Documentation, 55(4), 1999, 409-448.
30. Lesk, M.E. Practical digital libraries: books, bytes, and bucks. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman, 1997.
31. Levy, D.M. and Marshall, C.C. Going digital: a look at the assumptions underlying digital libraries. Communications of the ACM, 38(4), 1995, 77-84.
32. Lyman, P. What is a digital library? Technology, intellectual property, and the public interest. Daedalus, 125(4), 1996, 1-33. Special issue: Books, bricks, and bytes. Republished in: Graubard, S.R. and LeClerc, P., eds. Books, bricks, and bytes: libraries in the twenty-first century. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1998.
33. Lyman, P. What is a digital library? Technology, intellectual property, and the public interest. Daedalus, 125(4), 1996, 1-33. Special issue: Books, bricks, and bytes. Republished in: Graubard, S.R. and LeClerc, P., eds. Books, bricks, and bytes: libraries in the twenty-first century. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1998.
34. Zhao, D.G. and Ramsden, A. Report on the ELINOR electronic library pilot. Information Services & Use, 15(3), 1995, 199-212.
35. Lynch, C. and Garcia-Molina, H. Interoperability, scaling, and the digital libraries research agenda. 1995. http://www.hpcc.gov/reports/reports-nco/ iita-dlw/main.html (visited 6 March 2000).
36. Waters, D.J. What are digital libraries? CLIR (Council on Library and Information Resources) Issues, 4, 1998. http://www.clir.org/pubs/issues/ issues04.html (visited 6 March 2000).
37. Borgman, C.L. et al. Social aspects of digital libraries. Final report to the National Science Foundation; Computer, Information Science, and Engineering Directorate; Division of Information, Robotics, and Intelligent Systems; Information Technology and Organizations Program. Award number 95-28808. 1996. http://is.gseis.ucla.edu/DL/Report.html (visited 3 December 1999).
38. Price, D.J. de Solla. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.
39. Chubin, D.E. The conceptualization of scientific specialties. Scientometrics, 12(5-6), 1976, 373-379.
40. Mullins, N.C. The distribution of social and cultural properties in informal communication networks among biological scientists. American Sociological Review, 42(3), 1977, 552-562.
41. Agre, P.E. Institutional circuitry: thinking about the forms and uses of information. Information Technology and Libraries, 14(4), 1995, 225-230.
42. Agre, P.E. Designing genres for new media: social, economic, and political contexts. In: Jones, S., ed. CyberSociety 2.0: revisiting CMC and community. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1998.
43. Arms, W.Y. Digital libraries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
44. Bishop, A.P. Document structure and digital libraries: how researchers mobilise information in journal articles. Information Processing & Management, 35(3), 1999, 255-279.
45. Bishop, A.P., Buttenfield, B.P. and Van House, N., eds. Digital library use: social practice in design and evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
46. Borgman, C.L. Uses, users, and usability of digital libraries. In: Bishop, A.P., Buttenfield, B.P. and Van House, N., eds. Digital library use: social practice in design and evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
47. Borgman, C.L. Digital libraries and virtual universities. In: Della Senta, T. and Tschang, T., eds. Access to knowledge: new information technologies and the emergence of the virtual university. Paris: International Association of Universities Press; Oxford: Pergamon, 2000.
48. Bowker, G.C. and Star, S.L. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
49. Brown, J.C. and Duguid, P. The social life of documents. First Monday, 1995. http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue1/documents/index.html (visited 3 December 1999).
50. Covi, L.M. How academic researchers use digital libraries for scholarly communication. 1996. http://scils.rutgers.edu/~covi/doc/social-worlds-asis.html (visited 3 December 1999).
51. Covi, L.M. Material mastery: how university researchers use digital libraries for scholarly communication. 1996. http://scils.rutgers.edu/~covi/ dissertation/Titlepage.html (visited 3 December 1999).
52. Covi, L.M. Material mastery: situating digital library use in university research practices. Information Processing & Management, 35(3), 1996, 293-316.
53. Covi, L.M. and Kling, R. Organizational dimensions of effective digital library use: closed rational and open natural systems models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(9), 1996, 672-689.
54. Hill, L.L. et al. Alexandria Digital Library: user evaluation studies and system design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(13), 1999, 1169-1181.
55. Levy, D.M. I read the news today, oh boy: reading and attention in digital libraries. In: ACM digital libraries '97. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Digital Libraries. New York: ACM, 1997, 202-211.
56. Rayward, W.B. Some schemes for restructuring and mobilising information in documents: a historical perspective. Information Processing & Management, 30(2), 1994, 163-175.
57. Twidale, M.B. and Nichols, D.M. A survey of applications of CSCW for digital libraries. Technical report CSEG/4/98, Computing Department, Lancaster University, UK, 1998. Also available at: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/ computing/research/cseg/projects/ariadne/docs/survey.html (visited 3 December 1999).
58. Twidale, M.B. and Nichols, D.M. Computer supported cooperative work in information search and retrieval. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 33, 1998, 259-319.
59. Wilson, T.D. Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 1999, 249-270.
60. National Science Foundation, Digital Libraries Initiative - Phase 2. Related links to digital library research in undergraduate education, http://www.dli2. nsf.gov/under.html (visited 3 December 1999).
61. Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype Project (ADEPT), http://is.gseis.ucla. edu/adept/; and http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/adept/ (visited 3 December 1999).
62. Besser, H. Issues and challenges for the distance-independent environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(11), 1996, 817-820.
63. Buckland, M.K. Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 1991, 351-360.
64. Buckland, M.K. What is a 'document'? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(9), 1997, 804-809.
65. Filtering and Collaborative Filtering. Fifth DELOS Workshop, Budapest, 10-12 November 1997. European Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics. Le Chesnay, France: ERCIM, 1997.
66. Green, S., Cunningham, P. and Somers, F. Agent mediated collaborative Web page filtering. In: Klusch, M. and Weiss, G., eds. Cooperative information agents II: learning, mobility and electronic commerce for information discovery on the Internet. Second International Workshop, CIA '98. Proceedings, Paris, France, 4-7 July, 1998. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1998, 195-205.
67. Lievrouw, L.A. et al. Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical sciences. Social Networks, 9(2), 1987, 217-238.
68. Odlyzko, A.M. Silicon dreams and silicon bricks: the continuing evolution of libraries. Library Trends, 46(1), 1997, 152-167.
69. Borgman, C.L. Round in circles: the scholar as author and end-user in the electronic environment. In: Woodward, H. and Pilling, S., eds. The international serials industry. London: Gower, 1993, 45-59.
70. Ginsparg, P. Winners and losers in the global research village. Invited talk, UNESCO, Paris, 21 February 1996. http://xxx.lanl.gov/blurb/pg96unesco. html (visited 6 March 2000).
71. Kling, R. and Covi, L. Electronic journals and legitimate media in the systems of scholarly communication. Information Society, 11(4), 1995, 261-272.
72. Bits of power: issues in global access to scientific data. Committee on Issues in the Transborder Flow of Scientific Data, US National Committee for CODATA; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications; National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997.
73. Lyman, P. The UCC 2-B debate and the sociology of the information age. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 13(3), 1998, 1063-1087.
74. Mann, C.C. Who will own your next good idea? Atlantic Monthly, September 1998. http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/98sep/copy.htm (visited 6 March 2000).
75. Hedstrom, M. Digital preservation: a time bomb for digital libraries. Computers and the Humanities, 31(3), 1998, 189-202.
76. Van Bogart, J.W.C. Magnetic tape storage and handling: a guide for libraries and archives. Washington, DC: Commission on Preservation and Access; St Paul, MN: National Media Laboratory, 1995.
77. Rothenberg, J. Ensuring the longevity of digital documents. Scientific American, 272(1), 1995, 24-29.
78. Foster, I. and Kesselman, C. The grid: blueprint for a new computing infrastructure. Los Altos [&] San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.
79. Hedstrom, M. Understanding electronic incunabula: a framework for research on electronic records. American Archivist, 54(3), 1991, 334-354.
80. Moore, R. et al. Collection-based long-term preservation. GA Report GA-A23183 submitted to National Archives and Records Administration, June 1999.
81. Ekman, R. and Quandt, R.E., eds. Technology and scholarly communication. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.
82. Frye, B.E. Universities in transition: implications for libraries. In: Dowler, L., ed. Gateways to knowledge: the role of academic libraries in teaching, learning, and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997, 3-16.
83. Carpenter, L., Shaw, S. and Prescott, A., eds. Towards the digital library: the British Library's Initiatives for Access Programme. London: The British Library, 1998.
84. Olsen, J. The gateway library: point of entry to the electronic library. In: Dowler, L., ed. Gateways to knowledge: the role of academic libraries in teaching, learning, and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997, 123-134.
85. Dowler, L., ed. Gateways to knowledge: the role of academic libraries in teaching, learning, and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
86. Rockwell, R.C. The concept of the gateway library: a view from the periphery. In: Dowler, L., ed. Gateways to knowledge: the role of academic libraries in teaching, learning, and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997, 109-122.