The Computational Perception of Scene Dynamics

Computer Vision and Image Understanding

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 113-128

  Mann, Richard ^a   Jepson, Allan ^a   Siskind, Jeffrey Mark ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; COMPUTATION THEORY; DYNAMICS; KINEMATICS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; VIDEO CAMERAS;

IMAGE SEQUENCES; NEWTONIAN MECHANICS;

IMAGE UNDERSTANDING;

EID: 0031073956     PISSN: 10773142     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/cviu.1996.0576     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. N. I. Badler, Temporal scene analysis: Conceptual descriptions of object movements, Technical Report 80, University of Toronto Department of Computer Science, February 1975.
2. D. Baraff, Interactive simulation of solid rigid bodies, IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl. 15(3), 1995, 63-75.
3. M. J. Black and A. D. Jepson, EigenTracking: Robust matching and tracking of articulated objects using a view-based representation, Int. J. Comput. Vision, in press.
4. M. Blum, A. K. Griffith, and B. Neumann, A Stability Test for Configurations of Blocks, A. I. Memo 188, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, February 1970.
5. G. C. Borchardt, Event calculus, in Proc. Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles, CA, August 1985, pp. 524-527.
6. M. Brand, L. Birnbaum, and P. Cooper, Sensible scenes: Visual understanding of complex scenes through causal analysis, in Proc. Eleventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, July 1993, pp. 588-593.
7. S. E. Fahlman, A planning system for robot construction tasks, Artif. Intell. 5(1), 1974, 1-49.
8. R. Featherstone, Robot Dynamics Algorithms, Kluwer, Boston, 1987.
9. J. J. Freyd, T. M. Pantzer, and J. L. Cheng, Representing statics as forces in equilibrium, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 117(4), 1988, 395-407.
10. B. V. Funt, Problem-solving with diagrammatic representations, Artif. Intell. 13(3), 1980, 201-230.
11. D. L. Gilden and D. R. Proffitt, Understanding collision dynamics, J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 15(2), 1989, 372-383.
12. H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1980.
13. K. Ikeuchi and T. Suehiro, Towards an assembly plan from observation, part i. Task recognition with polyhedral objects, IEEE Trans. Rob. Automat. 10(3), 1994, 368-385.
14. M. Jenkin and A. D. Jepson, Detecting floor anomalies, in Proc. British Mach. Vision Conf., York, UK, 1994, pp. 731-740.
15. A. D. Jepson and M. J. Black, Mixture models for optical flow, in Proc. DIMACS Workshop on Partitioning Data Sets (I. Cox, P. Hansen, and B. Julesz, Eds.), pp. 271-286, Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1993.
16. A. D. Jepson and W. Richards, What is a percept? Technical Report RBCV-TR-93-43, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, April 1993.
17. A. D. Jepson, W. Richards, and D. Knill, Modal structure and reliable inference, in Perception as Bayesian Inference (D. Knill and W. Richards, Eds.), pp. 63-92, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1996.
18. L. Joskowicz and E. P. Sacks, Computational kinematics, Artif. Intell. 51(1-3), 1991, 381-416.
19. Y. Kuniyoshi and H. Inoue, Qualitative recognition of ongoing human action sequences, in Proc. Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Chambery, France, August 1993, pp. 1600-1609.
20. A. M. Leslie and S. Keeble, Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition 25, 1987, 265-288.
21. D. G. Luenberger, Linear and Nonlinear Programming, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1984.
22. R. Mann, Computational Perception of Scene Dynamics, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, in preparation.
23. J. McCarthy, Applications of circumscription to formalizing common sense reasoning, Artif. Intell. 28, 1986, 89-116.
24. B. Neumann and H.-J. Novak, Event models for recognition and natural language description of events in real-world image sequences, in Proc. Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Karlsruhe, August 1983, pp. 724-726.
25. D. R. Proffitt, M. K. Kaiser, and S. M. Whelan, Understanding wheel dynamics, Cog. Psychol. 22, 1990, 342-373.
26. R. Reiter and A. Mackworth, A logical framework for depiction and image interpretation, Artif. Intell. 41, 1989, 125-155.
27. W. Richards, A. D. Jepson, and J. Feldman, Priors, preferences and categorical percepts, in Perception as Bayesian Inference (D. Knill and W. Richards, Eds.), pp. 93-122, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1996.
28. E. Shavit and A. D. Jepson, Qualitative motion from visual dynamics, in IEEE Workshop on Qualitative Vision, New York, June 1993.
29. J. M. Siskind, Naive Physics, Event Perception, Lexical Semantics, and Language Acquisition, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, January 1992.
30. J. M. Siskind, Axiomatic support for event perception, in Proc. AAAI-94 Workshop on the Integration of Natural Language and Vision Processing, Seattle, WA, August 1994 (P. McKevitt, Ed.), pp. 153-160.
31. J. M. Siskind, Grounding language in perception, Artif. Intell. Rev. 8, 1995, 371-391.
32. J. K. Tsotsos, J. Mylopoulos, H. D. Covvey, and S. W. Zucker, A framework for visual motion understanding, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2(6), 1980, 563-573.