Evaluation of modified chitosan as matrix for hydrophobic interaction chromatography

Process Biochemistry

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 647-653

  Dhananjay, S K ^a   Mulimani, V H ^a  

^a GULBARGA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Aspergillus oryzae; Chitosan; Glutaraldehyde; Hydrophobic interaction chromatography; Ionic strength; Purification

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDES; ENZYMES; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; HYDROPHOBIC CHROMATOGRAPHY; IONIC STRENGTH;

AMMONIUM SULFATE; GALACTOSIDASE; HYDROPHOBIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY;

CHITOSAN;

ASPERGILLUS ORYZAE;

EID: 42749089538     PISSN: 13595113     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2008.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hemström P., and Irgum K. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J Sep Sci 29 12 (2006) 1784-1821
2. Jannissen H.P. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Int J Bio-Chromatogr 5 (2000) 131-138
3. Ree S. Protein purification methods. In: Harris E.L.V., and Angal S. (Eds). A practical approach (1989), IRL Press, Oxford 175
4. Fausnaugh J.L., Kennedy L.A., and Regnier F.E. Comparison of hydrophobic interaction and reversed phase chromatography of proteins. J Chromatogr 317 (1984) 141-155
5. Lienqueo M.E., Mahn A., Salgado J.C., and Asenjo J.A. Current insights on protein behavior in hydrophobic interaction chromatography. J Chromatogr B 849 (2007) 53-68
6. Eriksson K. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography. In: Janson J.C., and Ryden L. (Eds). Protein purification: principles, high-resolution methods and applications (1998), Wiley-Liss, New York
7. Taipa M.A., Moura-Pinto P., and Cabral J.M.S. Identification and characterization of Chromobacterium viscosum lipase. Biotechnol Tech 8 (1994) 27-32
8. Hermanson G.T., Mallia A.K., and Smith P.K. Immobilized affinity ligand techniques (1992), Academic Press, San Diego, CA
9. Agarwal R., and Gupta M.N. Evaluation of glutaraldehyde modified chitosan as matrix for hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Anal Chem Acta 313 (1995) 253-257
10. Tharanathan R.N., and Kittur F.S. Chitin the undisputed biomolecule of great potential. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 43 (2003) 61-87
11. Guo T.Y., Xia Y.Q., Wang J., Song M.D., and Zhang B.H. Chitosan beads as molecular imprinted polymer matrix for selective separation of proteins. Biomaterials 26 (2005) 5737-5745
12. Roy I., Sardar M., and Gupta M.N. Exploring unusual affinity of usual polysaccharides for separation of enzymes on fluidized beds. Enzyme Microb Technol 27 (2000) 53-65
13. Shi Y.C., Jiang Y.M., Sui D.X., Li Y.L., Chen T., Ma L., et al. Affinity chromatography of trypsin using chitosan as ligand support. J Chromatogr A 742 (1996) 107-112
14. Day P.M., and Pridham J.B. Biochemistry of α-galactosidase. Adv Enzymol 36 (1972) 911-930
15. Ulezlo I.V., and Zaprometova O.M. Microbial α-galactosidase. Prikl Biokhim Microbiol 18 (1982) 3-15
16. Mulimani V.H., and Ramalingam. Enzymic hydrolysis of raffinose and stachyose present in soymilk by crude α-galactosidase from Gibberella fujikuroi. Biochem Mol Biol Int 36 (1995) 897-905
17. Thippeswamy S., and Mulimani V.H. Enzymic degradation of raffinose family oligosaccharides in soymilk by immobilized α-galactosidase from Gibberella fujikuroi. Process Biochem 38 (2002) 635-640
18. Mulimani V.H., and Devindra S. Effect of soaking, cooking and crude α-galactosidase treatment on the oligosaccharide content of red gram flour. Food Biochem 61 (1998) 475-479
19. Prashanth S.J., and Mulimani V.H. Soymilk oligosaccharides hydrolysis by Aspergillus oryzae α-galactosidase immobilized in calcium alginate. Process Biochem 40 (2005) 1199-1205
20. Kulkarni D.S., Kapanoor S.S., Girigouda K., Kote N.V., and Mulimani V.H. Reduction of flatus inducing factors in soy milk. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 45 (2006) 51-57
21. Lowry A.H., Rosebrough N.J., Far A.L., and Randall J. Protein measurement with the phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193 (1951) 265
22. Laemmli U.K. Cleavage of structural protein during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227 (1970) 680-685
23. Morsch M., Girardi L.G.J., Cechinel-Filho V., Meyre-Silva C., and Rodrigues C.A. The use of chitosan modified with glutaraldehyde and glyoxal as chromatographic support for the separation of flavonoids from Aleurites moluccana leaves. Pharmazie 61 (2006) 670-672
24. Wang Y., Guo M., and Jiang Y. Evaluation of n-valeraldehyde modified chitosan as matrix for hydrophobic interaction chromatography. J Chromatogr A 952 (2002) 79-83
25. Mahn A., Lienqueo M.E., and Asenjo J.A. Optimal operation conditions for protein separation in hydrophobic interaction chromatography. J Chromatogr B 849 (2007) 236-242
26. Melander W., Corradini D., and Horvanth C. Salt mediated retention of proteins in hydrophobic interaction chromatography application of solvophobic theory. J Chromatogr 317 (1984) 67-85
27. Porath J. Salt-promoted adsorption: recent developments. J Chromatogr 376 (1986) 331-341
28. Xia F., Nagrath D., Garde S., and Crsmer S.M. Evaluation of selectivity changes in HIC systems using a preferential interaction based analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 87 (2004) 354-363
29. Haidacher D., Vailaya A., and Harvath C. Temperature effect in hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93 (1996) 2290-2295
30. Hjerten S., Rosengren S., and Pahlman. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography the synthesis and the use of some alkyl and aryl derivatives of agarose. J Chromatogr 101 (1974) 281-288
31. Hjerten S., Yao K., Erikson K.O., and Johansson B. Gradiant and isocratic high performance hydrophobic interaction chromatography of proteins on agarose columns. J Chromatogr 359 (1986) 99-109
32. Xia F., Nagrath D., and Cramer S.M. Effect of pH change on water release value in hydrophobic interaction chromatographic systems. J Chromatogr A 1079 (2005) 229-235
33. Wang Y., Guo M.L., Jiang S.L., Chen T., Jiang Y.M., and Chen Y. Study and characteristics and applications of a new hydrophobic interaction chromatographic packing using chitosan as support. Sep Purif 18 (2000) 354-356
34. Sudarshan N.R., Hoover D.G., and Koor D. Antibacterial action of chitosan. Food Biotechnol 6 (1992) 257-272