Static electromagnetic fields generated by corrosion currents inhibit human osteoblast differentiation

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 955-959

  Denaro, Vincenzo ^a   Cittadini, Achille ^b   Barnaba, Simona A ^a   Ruzzini, Laura ^a,d   Denaro, Luca ^c   Rettino, Alessandro ^b   Paola, Barbara De ^b   Papapietro, Nicola ^a   Sgambato, Alessandro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY CAMPUS BIO MEDICO   (Italy)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^d NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Alkaline phosphatase; Human osteoblasts; Osteoblastic differentiation; RT PCR; Spine devices; Static electromagnetic fields

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; MESSENGER RNA; OSTEOCALCIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR RUNX2; RUNX2 PROTEIN, HUMAN; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORROSION CURRENT; DOWN REGULATION; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FEMUR HEAD; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; CHEMISTRY; CORROSION; ENZYMOLOGY; FEMUR; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TIME;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; COLLAGEN TYPE I; CORE BINDING FACTOR ALPHA 1 SUBUNIT; CORROSION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; FEMUR; HUMANS; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, MESSENGER; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 42449153884     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c90b8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Vermes C, Chandrasekaran R, Jacobs J, et al. The effect of particulate wear debris, cytokines, and growth factors on the functions of MG-63 osteoblasts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:201.
2. YamamotoY, Ohsaki Y, Goto T, et al. Effects of static magnetic fields on bone formation in rat osteoblast cultures. J Dent Res 2003;82:962-6.
3. Owen TA, Aronow M, Shalhoub V, et al. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol 1990;143:420-30.
4. Stein GS, Lian JB, Stein JL, et al. Transcriptional control of osteoblast growth and differentiation. Physiol Rev 1996;76:593-629.
5. Shimizu E, Matsuda-Honjyo Y, Samoto H, et al. Static magnetic fields-induced bone sialoprotein (BSP) expression is mediated through FGF2 response element and pituitary-specific transcription factor-1 motif. J Cell Biochem 2004;91:1183-96.
6. Simko M, Mattsson M-O. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields as effectors of cellular responses in vitro: possible immune cell activation. J Cell Biochem 2004;93:83-92.
7. Denaro V, Papapietro N, Sgambato A, et al. Periprosthetic electrochemical corrosion of titanium and titanium-based alloys as a cause of spinal fusion failure. Spine 2007. In press.
8. Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S, et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa 1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to mutational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 1997;89:755-64.
9. Prince M, Banerjee C, Javed A, et al. Expression and regulation of Runx/Cbfa1 and osteoblast phenotypic markers during the growth and differentiation of human osteoblasts. J Cell Biochem 2001;80:424-44.
10. Vermes C, Roebuck KA, Chandrasekaran R, et al. Particulate wear debris activates protein tyrosine kinases and nuclear factor-kappa B which down regulates type I collagen syntesis in human osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:1756-63.
11. Vermes C, Glant TT, Hallab NJ, et al. The potential role of the osteoblast in the development of periprosthetic osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 2001;16(Suppl 1):95-100.
12. Cunningham BW, Orbegoso CM, Dmitriev AE, et al. The effect of titanium particulate on development and maintenance of a posterolateral spinal arthrodesis: an in vivo rabbit model. Spine 2002;27:1971-82.
13. Mochida Y, Bauer TW, Nitto H, et al. Influence of stability and mechanical properties of a spinal fixation device on production of wear debris particles in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:193-8.
14. Wang JC, Yu WD, Sandhu HS, et al. Metal debris from titanium spinal implants. Spine 1999;24:946-51.
15. Kasai Y, Iida R, Uchida A. Metal concentrations in the serum and hair of patients with titanium alloy spinal implants. Spine 2003;28:1320-6.
16. Fukada E, Yasuda I. On the piezoelectric effect of bone. J Physiol Soc Japan 1957;12:1158-62.
17. Friedenberg ZB, Brighton CT. Bioelectric potentials in bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;48:915-23.
18. Bassett CAL, Pawluk RJ. Effects of electric currents on bone in vivo. Nature 1964;204:652-4.
19. Bassett CAL. Pulsing electromagnetic fields: a new method to modify cell behavior in calcified and non calcified tissues. Calcif Tissue Int 1982;34:1-8.
20. Mammi GI, Rocchi R, Cadossi R, et al. The electrical stimulation of tibial osteotomies. Double-blind study. Clin Orthop 1993;288:246-53.
21. Kubota K, Yoshimura N, Yokota M, et al. Overview of effects of electrical stimulation on osteogenesis and alveolar bone. J Periodontol 1995;66:2-6.
22. Fredericks DC, Nepola JV, Baker JT, et al. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone healing in a rabbit tibial osteotomy model. J Orthop Trauma 2000;14:93-100.
23. Norton LA. Effects of a pulsed electromagnetic field on a mixed chondroblastic tissue culture. Clin Orthop 1982;167:280-9.
24. Elliott JP, Smith RL, Block CA. Time-varying magnetic fields: Effects of orientation on chondrocytes proliferation. J Orthop Res 1988;6:259-64.
25. Iannacone WM, Pienkowski D, Pollack SR, et al. Pulsing electromagnetic field stimulation of the in vitro growth plate. J Orthop Res 1988;6:239-47.
26. Chang WHS, Chen LT, Sun JS, et al. Effect of pulse-burst electromagnetic field stimulation on osteoblast cell activities. Bioelectromagnetics 2004;25:457-65.
27. Aaron RK, Boyan BD, Ciombor DM, et al. Stimulation of growth factor synthesis by electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;419:30-7.
28. Goodman R, Abbot J, Krim A, et al. Nucleic acid and protein synthesis in cultured chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells exposed to the pulsed electromagnetic fields. J Bioelect 1985;4:565.
29. Korenstein R, Somjen D, Fischler H, et al. Capacitative pulsed electric stimulation of bone cells. Induction of cyclic-AMP and DNA synthesis. Biochem Biophys Acta 1984;803:302-7.
30. Huang H-M, Lee S-Y, Yaoet W-C. Static magnetic fields up-regulate osteoblast maturity by affecting local differentiation factors. Clin Orth Rel Res 2006;447:201-208.