Exploring scholarly reputation: It's more than just productivity

Scientometrics

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 249-272

  Dewett, Todd ^a   Denisi, Angelo S ^b  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243063878     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027796.55585.61     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. AMABILE, T. M. (1988), A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: B. M. STAW, L. L. CUMMINGS (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Vol. 10, pp. 123-167.
2. AMABILE, T. M. (1996), Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3. AMABILE, T. M., GRYSKIEWICZ, S. S. (1987), Creativity in the R&D Laboratory. Technical Report no. 30. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
4. BACHARACH, S. B. (1989), Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 496-515.
5. BARRON, R. M., KENNY, D. A. (1986), The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6): 1173-1182.
6. BEYER, J. M., CHANOVE, R. G., FOX, W. B. (1995), The review process and the fates of manuscripts submitted to AMJ. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (5): 1219-1260.
7. CABLE, D. M., MURRAY, B. (1999), Tournaments versus sponsored mobility as determinants of job search success. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (4): 439-449.
8. CLEMENS, E. S., POWELL, W. W., MCILWAINE, K., OKAMOTO, D. (1995), Careers in print: Books, journals, and scholarly reputations. American Journal of Sociology, 101 (2): 433-494.
9. COAN, R. W. (1968), Dimensions of psychological theory. American Psychologist, 23: 715-722.
10. COAN, R. W., ZAGONA, S. V. (1962), Contemporary ratings of psychological theorists. Psychological Record, 12: 315-322.
11. COLE, S., COLE, J. (1967), Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 32: 377-390.
12. COLE, S., COLE, J. (1973), Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. COLEMAN, S. R., NORMAN, D. A. (1999), Psychology of the scientist: LXXIX. Visibility of psychological research and the fickleness of audiences: A case study. Psychological Reports, 84: 447-456.
14. CRANE, D. (1965), Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review, 30: 699-714.
15. CRANE, D. (1967), The gatekeepers of science: some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. American Sociologist, 1: 195-201.
16. DAFT, R. L. (1984), Antecedents of significant and not-so-significant organizational research. In: T. S. BATEMAN, G. R. FERRIS (Eds), Method and Analysis in Organizational Research, Reston, VA: Reston Publishing, pp. 3-14.
17. DOGAN, M., PAHRE, R. (1990), Scholarly reputation and obsolescence in the social sciences: Innovation as a team sport. International Social Science Journal, 42 (3): 417-427.
18. ERICSSON, K. A., KRAMPE, R. T., TESCH-ROMER, C. (1993), The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100: 363-406.
19. GASTON, J. (1978), The Reward System in British and American Science. New York: Wiley.
20. GLICK, B. (1997), Survey Feedback from Surveys of Journal Reputations. INFORMS Committee Review of Organization Science.
21. GOMEZ-MEJIA, L. R., BALKIN, D. B. (1992), Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (5): 921-955.
22. HAGSTROM, W. O. (1974), Competition in science. American Sociological Review, 39: 1-18.
23. HASSELBACK, J. R. (1996), The 1995 1996 McGraw-Hill Directory of Management Faculty. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
24. HELMREICH, R. L., SPENCE, J. T., BEANE, W. E., LUCKER, G. W., MATTHEWS, K. A. (1980), Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39: 896-908.
25. JAMES, L. R. (1982), Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 219-229.
26. JAMES, L. R., BRETT, J. M. (1984), Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 (2): 307-321.
27. JAMES, L. R., DEMAREE, R. G., WOLF, G. (1984), Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 (1): 85-98.
28. LONG, R. G., BOWERS, W. P., BARNETT, T., WHITE, M. C. (1998), Research productivity of graduates in management: Effects of academic origin and academic affiliation. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (6): 704-714.
29. MERTON, R. K. (1973), The Sociology of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. NEWMAN, J. M., COOPER, E. (1993), Determinants of academic recognition: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (3): 518-526.
31. OLDHAM, G. R., CUMMINGS, A. (1996), Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (3): 607-634.
32. OSTROFF, C. (1992), The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77 (6): 963-974.
33. OVER, R. (1982), The durability of scientific reputation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 18: 53-61.
34. QUANDT, R. E. (1976), Some quantitative aspects of the economics journal literature. Journal of Political Economy, 84: 741-755.
35. nd Edition, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Vol. 1, pp. 419-489.
36. SHALLEY, C. E. (1991), Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (2): 179-185.
37. SHALLEY, C. R., GILSON, L. L., BLUM, T. C. (2000), Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (2): 215-233.
38. SIMONTON, D. K. (1991), Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61: 829-840.
39. SIMONTON, D. K. (1997), Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104 (1): 66-89.
40. SIMONTON, D. K. (2000a), Methodological and theoretical orientation and the long-term disciplinary impact of 54 eminent psychologists. Review of General Psychology, 4 (1): 13-24.
41. SIMONTON, D. K. (2000b), Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20: 283-318.
42. SOBEL, M. E. (1982), Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In: S. LEINHART (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 290-312.
43. Social Science Citation Index (2000), Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Scientific Information.
44. STACK, S. (1994), An analysis of the impacts of books and journal articles. International Review of Modern Sociology, 24 (2): 119-125.
45. SWANSON, L., TRAHAN, M. (1986), Characteristics of frequently cited articles in learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 20: 167-182.
46. TRIESCHMANN, J. S., DENNIS, A. R., NORTHCRAFT, G. R., NIEMI, A. (2000), Serving multiple constituencies in business schools: M. B. A. program versus research performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (6): 1130-1141.
47. TSUI, A. S. (1984), A role set analysis of managerial reputation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34: 64-96.
48. VON BAKANIC, V., MCPHAIL, C., SIMON, R. (1987), The manuscript review and decision-making process. American Sociological Review, 52: 631-642.
49. WEICK, K. E. (1989), Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 516-531.
50. WHETTEN, D. A. (1989), What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 490-495.
51. WOODMAN, R. W., SAWYER, J. E., GRIFFIN, R. W. (1993), Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293-321.
52. ZHOU, J. (1998), Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83 (2): 261-276.
53. ZIVNEY, T., BERTIN, W. (1992), Publish or perish: What the competition is really doing. Journal of Finance, 47: 295-329.