When is cataphoric reference recognised?

Cognition

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1112-1121

  Filik, Ruth ^a   Sanford, Anthony J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cataphora; Incremental processing; Pronoun resolution

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING;

EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VOCABULARY;

EID: 42249097730     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Altmann G.T.M., and Steedman M.J. Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 30 (1988) 191-238
2. Carden G. Backwards anaphora in discourse context. Journal of Linguistics 18 (1982) 361-387
3. Cornish F., Garnham A., Cowles C.W., Fossard M., and Andre V. Indirect anaphora in English and French: A cross-linguistic study of pronoun resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 52 (2005) 363-376
4. Cowart W., and Cairns H.S. Evidence for an anaphoric mechanism within syntactic processing: Some reference relations defy semantic and pragmatic constraints. Memory & Cognition 15 (1987) 318-331
5. Erku F., and Gundel J.K. The pragmatics of indirect anaphors. In: Verschueren J., and Bertuccelli-Papi M. (Eds). The pragmatic perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 international pragmatics conference (1987), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 533-545
6. Filik, R. Sanford, A.J., & Leuthold, H. (in press). Processing pronouns without antecedents: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
7. Garnham A. Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora (2001), Psychology Press, Sussex
8. Gerrig R., and McKoon R. Memory processes and experiential continuity. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 81-85
9. Greene S.B., Gerrig R.J., McKoon G., and Ratcliff R. Unheralded pronouns and management by common ground. Journal of Memory and Language 33 (1994) 511-526
10. Gordon P.C., and Hendrick R. Intuitive knowledge of linguistic co-reference. Cognition 62 (1997) 325-370
11. Gordon P.C., and Hendrick R. The representation and processing of co-reference in discourse. Cognitive Science 22 (1998) 389-424
12. Kaan E., and Swaab T.Y. Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15 (2003) 98-110
13. Kamide Y., Altmann G.T.M., and Haywood S.L. The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory & Language 49 (2003) 133-156
14. Kazanina N., Lau E.F., Lieberman M., Yoshida M., and Phillips C. The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora. Journal of Memory & Language 56 (2007) 384-409
15. Kennison S.M. Comprehending the pronouns her, him, and his: Implications for theories of referential processing. Journal of Memory and Language 49 (2003) 335-352
16. Klin C.M., Guzman A.E., Weingarter K.M., and Ralano A.S. When anaphor resolution fails: Partial encoding of anaphoric inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (2006) 131-143
17. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature 244 (1973) 522-523
18. McKoon G., Gerrig R.J., and Greene S.B. Pronoun resolution without pronouns: Some consequences of memory based text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 (1996) 919-932
19. Moxey L.M., Sanford A.J., Sturt P., and Morrow L.I. Constraints on the formation of plural reference objects: The influence of role, conjunction, and type of description. Journal of Memory and Language 51 (2004) 346-364
20. Pickering M.J., and Traxler M.J. Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24 (1998) 940-961
21. Sanford A.J., and Filik R. "They" as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: Eye tracking reveals a processing cost. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (2007) 171-178
22. Sanford A.J., Filik R., Emmott C., and Morrow L. They're digging up the road again: The processing cost of Institutional "They". The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (2008) 372-380
23. Sanford A.J., Garrod S.C., Lucas A., and Henderson R.J. Pronouns without explicit antecedents?. Journal of Semantics 2 (1983) 303-318
24. Sedivy J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., Chambers C.G., and Carlson G.N. Achieving incremental processing through contextual representation: Evidence from the processing of adjectives. Cognition 71 (1999) 109-147
25. Sturt P., and Lombardo V. Processing coordinate structures: Incrementality and connectedness. Cognitive Science 29 (2005) 291-305
26. Van Gompel R.P.G., and Liversedge S.P. The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29 (2003) 128-139
27. Van Gompel R.P.G., and Majid A. Antecedent frequency effects during the processing of pronouns. Cognition 90 (2004) 255-264