An incentive compatible conjoint ranking mechanism

American Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 487-498

  Lusk, Jayson L ^a   Fields, Deacue ^b   Prevatt, Walt ^a,b  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beef; Conjoint analysis; Incentive compatibility; Preference elicitation

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS; AGRICULTURAL MARKET; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LIVESTOCK FARMING; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; PROBABILITY; RANKING;

EID: 42149194333     PISSN: 00029092     EISSN: 14678276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01119.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alfnes, F., A.G. Guttormsen, G. Steine, and K. Kolstad. 2006. "Consumers' Willingness to Pay for the Color of Salmon: A Choice Experiment with Real Economic Incentives." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 1050-61.
2. Alfnes, F., and K. Rickertsen. 2003. "European Consumers' Willingness to Pay for U.S. Beef in Experimental Auction Markets." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 396-405.
3. Baker, G.A., and T.A. Burnham. 2001. "Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Foods: Market Segment Analysis and Implications for Producers and Policy Makers." Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26: 387-403.
4. Beggs, S., S. Cardell, and J. Hausman. 1981. "Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars." Journal of Econometrics 17: 1-19.
5. Ben-Avia, M., T. Morikawa, and F. Shiroishi. 1992. "Analysis of the Reliability of Preference Ranking Data." Journal of Business Research 24: 149-64.
6. Carlsson, F., and P. Martinsson. 2001. "Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41: 179-92.
7. Dickinson, D.L., and D. Bailey. 2002. "Meat Traceability: Are U.S. Consumers Willing to Pay for It?" Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 27: 348-64.
8. Ding, M.R. 2007. "An Incentive-Aligned Mechanism for Conjoint Analysis." Journal of Marketing Research 44: 214-23.
9. Ding, M., R. Grewal, and J. Liechty. 2005. "Incentive-Aligned Conjoint Analysis." Journal of Marketing Research 42: 67-83.
10. Green, P.E., A.M. Krieger, and Y. Wind. 2001. "Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects." Interfaces 31: S56-S73.
11. Green, P.E., and V. Srinivasan 1990. "Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice." Journal of Marketing 54: 3-19.
12. Haab, T.C., J. Huang, and J.C. Whitehead. 1999. "Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible?A Comment." Journal of Political Economy 107: 186-96.
13. Harrison, G., and J.A. List. 2004. "Field Experiments." Journal of Economics Literature 42: 1009-55.
14. Hausman, J.A., and P.A. Ruud. 1987. "Specifying and Testing Econometric Models for Rank-Ordered Data." Journal of Econometrics 34: 83-104.
15. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk." Econometrica 47: 263-91.
16. List, J.A., and C. Gallet. 2001. "What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?Evidence from a Meta-Analysis." Environmental and Resource Economics 20: 241-54.
17. List, J.A., and D. Lucking-Reiley. 2002. "Bidding Behavior and Decision Costs in Field Experiments." Economic Inquiry 40: 611-9.
18. Loureiro, M.L., W.J. Umberger, and S. Hine. 2003. "Testing the Initial Endowment Effect in Experimental Auctions." Applied Economics Letters 10: 271-5.
19. Lusk, J.L., T. Feldkamp, and T.C. Schroeder. 2004. "Experimental Auction Procedure: Impact on Valuation of Quality Differentiated Goods." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 389-405.
20. Lusk, J.L., F.B. Norwood, and R. Pruitt. 2006. "Consumer Demand for a Ban on Subtherapeutic Antibiotic Use in Pork Production. " American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 1015-33.
21. Lusk, J.L., J.R. Pruitt, and F.B. Norwood. 2006. "External Validity of a Field Experiment." Economics Letters 93: 285-90.
22. Lusk, J.L., J. Roosen, and J.A. Fox. 2003. "Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 16-29.
23. Lusk, J.L., and T.C. Schroeder. 2004. "Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible?A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 467-82.
24. Lusk, J.L., and J. Shogren. 2007. Experimental Auctions: Methods and Applications in Economic and Marketing Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. McCluskey, J.J., T.I. Wahl, Q. Li, and P.R. Wandschneider. 2005. "U.S. Grass-Fed Beef: Marketing Health Benefits." Journal of Food Distribution Research 36: 1-8.
26. Murphy, J.J., G.P. Allen, T. Stevens, and D.A. Weatherhead. 2005. "A Meta-Analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation." Environmental and Resource Economics 30: 313-25.
27. Novemsky, N., and D. Kahneman. 2005. "The Boundaries of Loss Aversion." Journal of Marketing Research 42: 119-28.
28. Rutström, E.E. 1998. "Home-grown Values and Incentive Compatible Auction Design." International Journal of Game Theory 27: 427-41.
29. Sayadi, S., M.C.G. Roa, and J.C. Requena. 2005. "Ranking versus Scale Rating in Conjoint Analysis: Evaluating Landscapes in Mountainous Regions in Southeastern Spain." Ecological Economics 55: 539-50.
30. Swait, J., and J. Louviere. 1993. "The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models." Journal of Marketing Research 30: 305-14.
31. Umberger, W.J., D.M. Feuz, C.R. Calkins, and K. Killinger-Mann. 2002. "U.S. Consumer Preference and Willingness-to-Pay for Domestic Corn-Fed Beef versus International Grass-Fed Beef Measured Through an Experimental Auction." Agribusiness: An International Journal 18: 491-504.
32. Wertenbroch, K., and B. Skiera. 2002. "Measuring Consumers' Willingness to Pay at the Point of Purchase." Journal of Marketing Research 39: 228-41.