River flow forecasting using neural networks and auto-calibrated NAM model with shuffled complex evolution

Journal of Applied Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1487-1494

  Zakermoshfegh, M ^a,b   Ghodsian, M ^a   Salehi Neishabouri, S A A ^a   Shakiba, M ^c  

^a TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b JUNDI SHAPUR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^c K N TOOSI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Hydrologic model; Kashkan river; Multi layer perceptron; Radial basis function; River flow forecasting; Shuffled complex evolution

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; COMPLEX NETWORKS; DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; FLOW OF WATER; FORECASTING; FUNCTIONS; NETWORK LAYERS; NEURAL NETWORKS; RIVERS; STREAM FLOW;

HYDROLOGIC MODELING; MULTI LAYER PERCEPTRON; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; RIVER FLOW FORECASTING; SHUFFLED COMPLEX EVOLUTION;

RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS;

EID: 42149150046     PISSN: 18125654     EISSN: 18125662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2008.1487.1494     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Babovic, V. and V. Bojkow, 2001. Runoff modeling with genetic programming and artificial neural networks. D2K Technical Report D2K TR 0401-1.
2. Campolo, M., P. Andreussi and A. Soldati, 1999. River flow forecasting with a neural network model. Water Resour. Res., 35: 1191-1197.
3. Campolo, M., A. Soldati and P. Andreussi, 2003. Artificial neural network approach to flood forecasting in the River Arno. Hydrol. Sci. J., 48: 381-398.
4. Chang, F. and Y. Chen, 2001. A counter propagation fuzzy-neural network modeling approach to real time streamflow prediction. J. Hydrol., 245: 153-164.
5. Chau, K.W., C.L. Wu and Y.S. Li, 2005. Comparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze river. J. Hydrol. Eng., 10: 485-491.
6. Chau, K.W., 2006. Particle swarm optimization training algorithm for ANNs in stage prediction of shing Mun river. J. Hydrol., 329: 363-367.
7. Dawson, C.W. and R. Wilby, 1998. An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modeling. Hydrol. Sci. J., 43: 47-66.
8. Dawson, C.W., R.J. Abrahart, A.Y. Shamseldin and R.L. Wilby, 2006. Flood estimation at ungauged sites using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol., 319: 391-409.
9. Dibike, Y.B., D.P. Solomatine and M.B. Abbot, 1999. On the encapsulation of numerical-hydraulic models in artificial neural networks. J. Hydraul. Res., 37: 147-161.
10. Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian and H.V. Gupta, 1992. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour. Res., 28: 1015-1031.
11. Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian and H.V. Gupta, 1994. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. J. Hydrol., 158: 265-284.
12. Eslami, H.R., K. Qaderi and J.M.V. Samani, 2005. Autocalibration of flood forecasting using shuffled complex evolution (SCE) method. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Innovation, Advances and Implementation of Flood Forecasting Technology, Tromso, Norway. Publisher: HR Wallingford, Oxford Shire OX10 8BA, UK.
13. French, M.N., W.F. Krajewski and R.R. Cuykendall, 1992. Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural network. J. Hydrol., 137: 1-31.
14. Gautam, M.R., K. Watanabe and H. Saegusa, 2000. Runoff analysis in humid forest catchment with artificial neural network. J. Hydrol., 235: 117-136.
15. Gorzalczanv. M.B., 2002. Computational Intelligence Systems and Applications. Physica-Verlag Company, Heidelberg, Germany.
16. Hecht-Nielson, R., 1987. Kolmogorov's Mapping Neural Network Existence Theorem. 1st IEEE ICNN, Vol. 3. San Diago, CA.
17. Holland, J.H., 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann. Arbor.
18. Hsu, K.L., H.V. Gupta and S. Sorooshian, 1995. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resour. Res., 31: 2517-2530.
19. Imrie, C.E., S. Durucan and A. Korre, 2000. River flow prediction using artificial neural networks: Generalisation beyond the calibration range. J. Hydrol., 233: 138-153.
20. Jain, A., K.P. Sudheer and S. Srinivasulu, 2004. Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural network rainfall runoff models. Hydrol. Process, 18: 571-581.
21. Karayiannis, N.B. and A.N. Venetsanopoulos, 1993. Artificial Neural Networks: Learning Algorithms, Performance Evaluation and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
22. Mason, J.C., R.K. Price and Tem'me, 1996. A neural network model of rainfall-runoff using radial basis functions. J. Hydraul. Res., 34: 537-548.
23. Minns, A.W. and M.J. Hall, 1996. Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol. Sci. J., 41: 399-417.
24. Nash, J.E. and J.V. Sutcliffe, 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 10: 282-290.
25. Nelder, J.A. and R. Mead, 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J., 7: 308-313.
26. Nielsen, S.A. and E. Hansen, 1973. Numerical simulation of the rainfall runoff process on a daily basis. Nordic. Hydrol., 4: 171-190.
27. Pang, B., S. Guo, L. Xiong and C. Li, 2007. A nonlinear perturbation model based on artificial neural network. J. Hydrol., 333: 504-516.
28. Rajurka, M.P., U.C. Kothyari and U.C. Chaube, 2004. Modelling of the daily rainfall-runoff relationship with artificial neural network. J. Hydrol., 285: 96-113.
29. Rumelhart, D.E., J.L. McClelland and the PDP Research Group, 1986. Parallel Recognition in Modern Computers. In Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol 1. Foundations, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge Mass.
30. Shamseldin, A.Y., 1997. Application of a neural network technique to rainfall-runoff modelling. J. Hydrol., 199: 272-294.
31. Shamseldin, A.Y. and H.M. O'Connor, 2001. A nonlinear neural network technique for updating river flow forecasts. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5: 577-597.
32. Sivakumar, B., A.W. Jayawardena and T.M.K.G. Fernando, 2002. River flow forecasting: Use of phase-space reconstruction and artificial neural networks approaches. J. Hydrol., 265: 225-245.
33. Smith J. and R.N. Eli, 1995. Neural network models of the rainfall-runoff process. J. Water Res. Pl.-ASCE., 121: 499-508.
34. Sorooshian, S., Q. Duan and H.V. Gupta, 1993. Calibration of rainfall-runoff models: Application of global optimization to the sacramento soil moisture accounting model. Water Resour. Res., 29: 1185-1194.
35. Wang, Q.J., 1991. The genetic algorithms and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour. Res., 27: 2467-2471.
36. Werbos, P.J., 1974. Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in behaviour sciences. Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
37. Wilby, R.L., R.J. Abrahart and C.W. Dawson, 2003. Detection of conceptual model rainfall-runoff processes inside an artificial neural network. Hydrol. Sci. J., 48: 163-181.
38. Xiong, L. and K.M. O'Connor, 2002. Comparison of four updating models for real-time river flow forecasting. Hydrol. Sci. J., 47: 621-639.
39. Xiong, L., K.M. O'Connor and S.L. Guo, 2004. Comparison of three updating schemes using artificial neural network in flow forecasting. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8: 247-255.
40. Zhu, M.L., M. Fujita and N. Hashimoto, 1994. Application of Neural Networks to Runoff Prediction. In: Stochastic and Statistical Methods in Hydrology and Environmental Engineering, Hipel, K.W. et al. (Eds.). Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp: 205-216.