Designing a learning management system to support instruction

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 59-63

  Yueh, Hsiu Ping ^a,b   Hsu, Shihkuan ^b  

^a Center of Teaching and Learning Development

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FACE-TO-FACE (F2F) COURSES; INSTRUCTIONAL PRODUCTIVITY; LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS); SUPPORT INSTRUCTION;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; CURRICULA; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 42149137372     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1330311.1330324     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Akpinar, Y., Bal, V., and Simsek, H. An e-learning content development system on the Web: BU-LMS. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training. (Istanbul, Turkey, May 31-June 2, 2004), 239-243.
2. Boyd, G Toward the webversity: Managing to clone scholars and researchers via the Web. In Perspectives in Web Course Management. B. Mann, Ed. Canadian Scholar's Press, Toronto, ON, 2000, 69-77.
3. Ceraulo, S. Benefits of upgrading to an LMS. Distance Education Report 9, 9 (May 2005), 6-7.
4. Chevrin, V., Derycke, A., and Rouillard, J. Project Ubi-Learn: An intermediation infrastructure for multi-channel accesses to future LMS. In Proceedings of the Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications and International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services. (Guadeloupe, French Southern Territories, Feb. 19-25, 2006), 7.
5. Dagger, D., O'Connor, A., Lawless, S., Walsh, E., and Wade, V.P. Service-oriented e-learning platforms: From monolithic systems to flexible services. IEEE Internet Computing 11, 3 (May/June 2007), 28-35.
6. Gagné, R., Briggs, L., and Wager, W. Principles of Instructional Design, 4th Ed. HBJ College Publishers, Fort Worth, TX, 1992.
7. Grant, M. Learning to teach with the Web: Factors influencing teacher education faculty. The Internet and Higher Education 7, 4 (Nov. 2004), 329-341.
8. Laurillard, D. Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework fir the effective use of learning technologies, 2nd Ed. Routledge/Falmer, New York, NY, 2002.
9. National Center for Educational Statistics. Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000-2001 U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2003.
10. Rosenberg, M. E-leaming strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2001.
11. Woods, R., Baker, J., and Hopper, D. Hybrid structure: Faculty use and perception of Web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face instruction. Internet & Higher Education 7, 4 (Dec. 2004), 281-297.
12. Yildirim, S., Temur, N., Kocaman, A. and Goktas, Y. What makes a good LMS: An analytical approach to assessment of LMSs. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training. (Istanbul, Turkey, May 31-June 2, 2004), 125-130.