Strength and reversibility of movement stereotypes for lever control and circular display

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 233-244

  Chan, W H ^a   Chan, Alan H S ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Circular display; Lever control; Movement compatibility; Reversibility; Stereotype

Indexed keywords

CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; DISPLAY DEVICES; ERROR ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RESPONSE TIME (COMPUTER SYSTEMS); STRUCTURAL PANELS;

CIRCULAR DISPLAY; LEVER CONTROL; MOVEMENT COMPATIBILITY; REVERSIBILITY; STEREOTYPES;

MACHINE TOOLS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DECISION MAKING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ERGONOMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MACHINE LEARNING; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OPERATOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESPONSE TIME; STRENGTH;

EID: 33846804258     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.10.023     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brebner J., and Sandow B. The effect of scale side on population stereotype. Ergonomics 19 (1976) 571-580
2. Chan A.H.S., and Chan W.H. Movement compatibility for circular display and rotary controls positioned at peculiar positions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 36 (2006) 737-745
3. Chan A.H.S., Courtney A.J., and So K.W.Y. Circular displays with thumbwheels: Hong Kong Chinese preferences. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 10 4 (2000) 453-463
4. Chan A.H.S., Shum V.W.Y., and Poon K.K. An empirical study of compatibility on rotary control and horizontal display. Journal of Engineering Manufacture 216 (2002) 683-695
5. Chan A.H.S., Shum V.W.Y., Law H.W., and Hui I.K. Precise effects of control position, indicator type, and scale side on human performance. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 22 (2003) 380-386
6. Chan W.H., and Chan A.H.S. Movement compatibility for rotary control and circular display-computer simulated test and real hardware test. Applied Ergonomics 34 (2003) 61-67
7. Courtney A.J. Hong Kong Chinese direction-of-motion stereotypes. Ergonomics 37 (1994) 417-426
8. Courtney A.J. The effect of scale-side, indicator type, and control plane on direction-of-turn stereotypes for Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Ergonomics 37 (1994) 865-877
9. Fitts P.M., and Simon C.W. Some relations between stimulus patterns and performance in a continuous dual pursuit task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (1952) 428-438
10. Graham N.E. Manual tracking on a horizontal scale and in the four quadrants of a circular scale. British Journal of Psychology 43 (1952) 70-77
11. Hoffman, E.R., 1990a. Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes for horizontally moving displays. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 34th Annual Meeting, pp. 457-461.
12. Hoffman, E.R., 1990b. Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes of three-dimensional display/control arrangements, In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 34th Annual Meeting, pp. 462-466.
13. Hoffmann E.R. Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes-linear displays with rotary controls. Ergonomics 40 2 (1997) 199-222
14. Kroemer K.H.E., Kroemer H.B., and Kroemer-Elbert K.E. Selection, design, and arrangement of controls and displays. In: Fabrycky W.J., and Mize J.H. (Eds). Ergonomics: How to Design for Ease and Efficiency, Prentice Hall International Series in Industrial and Systems Engineering (1994), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 565
15. Loveless N.E. Display-control relationships on circular and linear scales. British Journal of Psychology 47 (1956) 271-282
16. Loveless N.E. Direction-of-motion stereotypes: a review. Ergonomics 5 (1962) 357-383
17. Petropoulos H., and Brebner J. Stereotypes for direction-of-movement of rotary controls associated with linear displays: the effects of scale presence and position, of pointer direction, and distances between the control and the display. Ergonomics 24 (1981) 143-151
18. Pulat B.M. Fundamentals of industrial ergonomics. Selection and Design of Displays and Controls (1992), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 235-277
19. Ross S., Shepp B.E., and Andrews T.G. Response preferences in display-control relationships. J. Appl. Psychol. 39 (1955) 425-428
20. Sanders M.S., and McCormick E.J. Human control of systems. Human Factors in Engineering and Design vols. 301-334 (1993), McGraw-Hill, Inc., Singapore pp. 58, 310
21. Simpson G., and Chan W. The derivation of population stereotypes for mining machines and some reservations on the general applicability of published stereotypes. Ergonomics 31 3 (1988) 327-336
22. Warrick, M.J., 1947. Direction of movement in the use of control knobs to position visual indicators. USAF AMC Report No. 694-4C.
23. Warrick, M.J., 1948. Direction of motion stereotypes in positioning a visual indicator by use of a control knob. II. Results from a printed test. USAF AMC Report No. MCREXD-694-19A.
24. Warrick, M.J., 1949. Effects of motion relationships on speed of positioning visual indicators by rotary control knobs. USAF AMC Technical Report No. 581.
25. Warrick, M.J., Grether, W.F., 1948. The effect of pointer alignment on the check reading of engine instrument panels. USAF AMC Memorandom Report No. MCREXD-694-172.
26. Worringham C.J., and Beringer D.B. Directional stimulus-response compatibility: a test of three alternative principles. Ergonomics 41 6 (1998) 864-880