Ad hoc Networking and Grid Computing from the perspective of the user: The case of screen sharing using Wireless Grids

2006 Second IEEE and IFIP International Conference in Central Asia on Internet, ICI 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Van De Wijngaert, Lidwien ^a   Vermaas, Karianne ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ad hoc networking; Field trial; Grid computing; User perspective; Wireless Grids

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; E-LEARNING; GRID COMPUTING; USER INTERFACES;

POTENTIAL USERS; WIRELESS GRIDS;

AD HOC NETWORKS;

EID: 41549147214     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CANET.2006.279239     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Niemegeers, I.G. and Heemstra de Groot, S.M. (2002). From Personal Area Networks to Personal Networks: A User Oriented Approach, Wireless Personal Communications, Volume 22, Issue 2, Aug 2002, Pages 175 - 186.
2. Foster, I. and Kesselman, C. (2004) The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
3. McKnight, L. W., Howison, J., & Bradner, S. (2004). Wireless grids: Distributed resource sharing by mobile, nomadic, and fixed devices. IEEE Internet Computing, 8(July-August), 24-31.
4. Van de Wijngaert, L. (2004). Old and new media; a threshold model of technology use. In H. Van Oostendorp & L. Breure & A. Dillon (Eds.), Creation, use, and deployment of digital information (pp. 247-261). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4 ed.). New York: The Free Press.
6. McKnight, L. W., Sharif, R. M., & Van de Wijngaert, L. (2005). Wireless Grids. Assessing a new technology from a user perspective. Paper presented at the Designing Ubiquitous Information Environments: Socio-Technical Issues and Challenges, Cleveland, Ohio.
7. Palmgreen, P., Lawrence, A., Wenner, L. A., & Rosengren, K. E. (1985). Uses and Gratifications Research: The Past Ten Years. In K. E. Rosengren & L. A. Wenner & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research: current perspectives (pp. 11-40). Beverly Hills: Sage.
8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
9. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance Of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
10. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems. MIS quarterly, 11(3), 355-366.
11. Schmitz, J., & Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic... Communication research, 18(4), 487, 437p.
12. Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research policy, 25(6), 865-899.
13. Lievrouw, L., & Livingstone, S. (2002). Introduction, The Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The Handbook of New Media (pp. 1-15). London: Sage.
14. Winston, B. (1998). Media Technology and Society. A history from the Telegraph to the Internet. London: Routledge.
15. Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: Technical Change and Everyday Life. In R. Mansell & R. Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by Design. The Politics of Information and Communication Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Mante-Meijer, E., & Haddon, L. (2001). Checking it out with the people. Ict markets and users in Europe. Heidelberg: Eurescom.
17. Frissen, V. (2000). ICTs in the Rush Hours of Life. Information Society, 16(1), 65-75.
18. McCreadie, M., & Rice, R. E. (1999). Trends in analyzing access to information. Part II. Unique and integrating conceptualizations. Information processing and management, 35(1), 77-99.
19. McCreadie, M., & Rice, R. E. (1999). Trends in analyzing access to information. Part I: cross-disciplinary conceptualizations of access. Information processing and management, 35(1), 45-76.
20. Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J., and Kiesler, S. "HomeNet: a field trial of residential Internet services " in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: common ground ACM Press, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 1996 pp. 284-291
21. Sawyer, S., Tapia, A., Pesheck, L., and Davenport, J. "Mobility and the first responder Commun. ACM (47 3 ) 2004 pp 62-65 Communications of the ACM Volume 47, Number 3 (2004), Pages 62-65 Mobility and the first responder
22. Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (1994). Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1, 18(1), 59-82.
23. Chau, P. Y. K. (1996). An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 185.
24. Choi, H., Choi, M., Kim, J., & Yu, H. (2003). An empirical study on the adoption of information appliances with a focus on interactive TV. Telematics and Informatics, 20, 161-183.
25. Klopping, I. M., & McKinney, E. (2004). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model and the Task -Technology Fit Model to Consumer E-Commerce. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 22(1).