Monitoring residual hearing during cochlear implantation by intra-operative brainstem audiometry

Auris Nasus Larynx

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 264-268

  Pau, Hans Wilhelm ^a   Just, Tino ^a   Dahl, Rüdiger ^a   Sievert, Uwe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Amplitude Modulation Following Response (AMFR); Brainstem audiometry; Cochlear implantation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; AMPLITUDE MODULATION FOLLOWING RESPONSE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTRIC ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; NOTCHED NOISE BRAINSTEM ELECTRIC RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY; PATIENT MONITORING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RESIDUAL HEARING;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE;

EID: 41549089135     PISSN: 03858146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2007.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. von Ilberg C., Kiefer J., Tillein J., Pfenningdorff T., Hartmann R., Sturzebecher E., et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 61 (1999) 334-340
2. Kiefer J., Gstoettner W., Baumgartner W., Pok S.M., Tillein J., Ye Q., et al. Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 124 (2004) 272-280
3. Gantz B.J., and Turner C.W. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope 113 (2003) 1726-1730
4. Gantz B.J., and Turner C. Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol 124 (2004) 344-347
5. Gantz B.J., Turner C., Gfeller K.E., and Lowder M.W. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 115 (2005) 796-802
6. Lehnhardt E., Wagner H., and Kabelka Z. Are we confident about operating on - or even inside - an inner ear that is still functional without having to fear that the patient will lose his residual hearing?. Otolaryngol Pol 58 (2004) 45-49
7. Pau H.W., Just T., Dommerich S., Lehnhardt E., and Behrend D. Concept and anatomical feasibility study of an "endosteal electrode" for bimodal stimulation in severely deaf ears. Laryngorhinootologie 84 (2005) 402-407
8. Pau H.W., Just T., Lehnhardt E., Hessel H., and Behrend D. An "endosteal electrode" for cochlear implantation in cases with residual hearing? Feasibility study: preliminary temporal bone experiments. Otol Neurotol 26 (2005) 448-454
9. Picton T.W., Ouellette J., Hamel G., and Smith A.D. Brainstem evoked potentials to tonepips in notched noise. J Otolaryngol 8 (1979) 289-314
10. Sturzebecher E., Cebulla M., and Pschirrer U. Efficient stimuli for recording of the amplitude modulation following response. Audiology 40 (2001) 63-68
11. Sturzebecher E., Cebulla M., and Elberling C. Automated auditory response detection: statistical problems with repeated testing. Int J Audiol 44 (2005) 110-117
12. Pethe J., Muhler R., Siewert K., and von Specht H. Near-threshold recordings of amplitude modulation following responses (AMFR) in children of different ages. Int J Audiol 43 (2004) 339-345
13. Cebulla M., Sturzebecher E., and Wernecke K.D. Objective detection of the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR). Audiology 40 (2001) 245-252
14. Luts H., Desloovere C., and Wouters J. Clinical application of dichotic multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses in high-risk newborns and young children. Audiol Neurootol 11 (2006) 24-37
15. Lehnhardt E. Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique HNO 1993;41:356-9 [in German].
16. Roland P.S., Gstöttner W., and Adunka O. Method for hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery. Operat Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 16 (2005) 93-100
17. Skarzynski H., Lorens A., Piotrowska A., and Anderson I. Partial deafness cochlear implantation provides benefit to a new population of individuals with hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 126 (2006) 934-940
18. Adunka O., Roush P., Grose J., Macpherson C., and Buchman C.A. Monitoring of cochlear function during cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 116 (2006) 1017-1020