Who is supposed to be regarded as a stakeholder for public organizations in developing countries? Evidence from an empirical investigation in Brazilian municipalities

Public Management Review

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 263-275

  Gomes, Ricardo Corrêa ^a   Gomes, Luciana de Oliveira Miranda ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Brazil; Decision making; Local government; Stateholder analysis; Surveys

Indexed keywords

EID: 41449104546     PISSN: 14719037     EISSN: 14719045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14719030801928714     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bovaird, T. and Halachmi, A. (2000) Performance management and best value: An international perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23:3, pp. 119-137.
2. Boyne, G. (1996) Scale, performance and the new public management: An empirical analysis of local authorities' services. Journal of Management Studies, 33:6, pp. 809-826.
3. Bryman, A. (2001) Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford
4. Bryman, A. (2004) Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford
5. Bryson, J. (1995) Strategic Planning for Public and Non-Profit Organization, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA
6. Coakes, S. J. and Steed, L. G. (1999) SPSS: Analysis without Anguish, John Wiley & Sons, Brisbane
7. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. E. (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidences, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20:1, pp. 65-91.
8. Freeman, R. E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, Massachusetts
9. Hood, C. (1995) Contemporary public management: A new paradigm?. Public Policy and Administration, 10:2, pp. 104-117.
10. Hood, C. (1995) The 'new public management' in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20:23, pp. 93-109.
11. Lawton, A., McKevitt, D. and Millar, M. (2000) Coping with ambiguity: reconciling external legitimacy and organizational implementation in performance measurement. Public Money & Management, 20:3, pp. 13-19.
12. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R. and Wood, D. J. (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of the who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22:4, pp. 853-886.
13. Mwita, J. I. (2000) Performance management model: A systems-based approach to public service quality. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13:1, pp. 19-37.
14. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector, Penguin Books, New York
15. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (2003) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Stanford Business Books, Stanford, CA
16. Rahman, S. (2001) A comparative study of TQM practice and organisation performance of SMEs with and without ISO 9000 certification. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 18:1, pp. 35-49.
17. Rowley, T. (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22:4, pp. 887-910.
18. Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J. and Blair, J. D. (1991) Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5:2, pp. 61-75.
19. Shropshire, C. and Hillman, A. J. (2007) A longitudinal study of significant change in stakeholder management. Business & Society, 46:1, pp. 63-87.
20. Winstanley, D., Sorabji, D. and Dawson, S. (1995) When the pieces don't fit: A stakeholder power matrix to analyse public sector restructuring. Public Money and Management, 15:2, pp. 19-26.