A longitudinal study of significant change in stakeholder management

Business and Society

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 63-87

  Shropshire, Christine ^a   Hillman, Amy J ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate social performance; Longitudinal study; Stakeholder management; Stakeholders; Strategic change

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847331145     PISSN: 00076503     EISSN: 14678594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0007650306295753     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abrahamson, E., & Fombrun, C. J. (1994). Macrocultures: Determinants and consequences. Academy of Management Review, 19 (4). 728-755.
2. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 507-526.
3. Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99 (394). 116-116.
4. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 117-194.
5. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28 (2). 446-446.
6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1). 99-120.
7. Baum, J. A. C., & Mezias, S. J. (1992). Localized competition and organizational failure in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898-1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37 (4). 580-580.
8. Baum, J. A. C., & Singh, J. V. (1994). Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational mortality. American Journal of Sociology, 100 (2). 346-346.
9. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5). 488-488.
10. Boeker, W. (1997). Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1). 152-170.
11. Boyd, B. K., Dess, G. G., & Rasheed, A. M. A. (1993). Divergence between archival and perceptual measures of the environment: Causes and consequences. Academy of Management Review, 18 (2). 204-226.
12. Campbell, J. L. (2006). Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. The American Behavioral Scientist, 49 (7). 925-925.
13. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4 (4). 17-17.
14. Chatman, J. A., & Jehn, K. A. (1994). Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational culture: How different can you be ? Academy of Management Journal, 37 (3). 522-553.
15. Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1991). Regression analysis by example (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
16. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1). 92-92.
17. Coombs, J. E., & Gilley, K. M. (2005). Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (9). 827-827.
18. Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Ownership structure and top management turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 45, 193-221.
19. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
20. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1). 65-91.
21. Finkelstein, S., & Boyd, B. K. (1998). How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (2). 179-199.
22. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 484-503.
23. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. Minneapolis, MN: West.
24. Fligstein, N., & Freeland, R. (1995). Theoretical and comparative perspectives on corporate organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 21-21.
25. Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
26. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2). 191-191.
27. Gordon, S. S., Stewart, W. H., Jr., Sweo, R., & Luker, W. A. (2000). Convergence versus strategic reorientation: The antecedents of fast-paced organizational change. Journal of Management, 26 (5). 911-911.
28. Green, S. (1992). The impact of ownership and capital structure on managerial motivation and strategy in management buy-outs: A cultural analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 29 (4). 513-535.
29. Greve, H. R. (1998). Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (1). 58-86.
30. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36 (1). 5-5.
31. Grinyer, P. H., McKiernan, P., & Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1988). Market, organizational and managerial correlates of economic performance in the U.K. electrical engineering industry. Strategic Management Journal, 9 (4). 297-318.
32. Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 844-886.
33. Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizations. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 369-406). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
34. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206.
35. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. H. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929-964.
36. Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5). 479-479.
37. Harrison, J. S., & St. John, C. H. (1996). Managing and partnering with external stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 10 (2). 46-46.
38. Haveman, H. A. (1993). Ghosts of managers past: Managerial succession and organizational mortality. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (4). 864-881.
39. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line ? Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2). 125-139.
40. Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Luce, R. A. (2001). Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference ? Business & Society, 40 (3). 295-295.
41. Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). CEO incentives: It's not how much you pay, but how. Harvard Business Review, 68 (3). 138-149.
42. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564-577.
43. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20 (2). 404-404.
44. Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2). 206-206.
45. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: Analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.
46. Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini, & Co. (1992-1999). KLD Database. Boston: Social Investment Fund, Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini, & Co.
47. Kroll, M., Wright, P., Toombs, L., & Leavell, H. (1997). Form of control: A critical determinant of acquisition performance and CEO rewards. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (2). 85-96.
48. Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. (1999). Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5). 553-563.
49. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31 (4). 854-854.
50. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification ? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (5). 603-609.
51. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1). 117-127.
52. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2). 340-363.
53. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4). 853-886.
54. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55. Oliver, C. (1997). The influence of institutional and task environment relationships on organizational performance: The Canadian construction industry. Journal of Management Studies, 34 (1). 99-99.
56. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24 (3). 403-403.
57. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
58. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
59. Preston, L. E., & Sapienza, H. J. (1990). Stakeholder management and corporate performance. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 361-375.
60. Ramaswamy, K. (1997). The performance impact of strategic similarity in horizontal mergers: Evidence from the U.S. banking industry. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3). 697-715.
61. Raytheon. (n.d.). Governance principles. Retrieved January 26, 2006, from http://raytheon.com.
62. Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J., & Paul, K. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32 (2). 143-143.
63. Schendel, D. E., & Hofer, C. W. (Eds.). (1979). Strategic management: A new view of business policy and planning. Boston: Little, Brown.
64. Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1). 43-43.
65. Shen, W., & Cho, T. S. (2005). Exploring involuntary executive turnover through a managerial discretion framework. Academy of Management Review, 30 (4). 843-854.
66. Short, J. C., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., & Snow, C. C. (2005, August). Corporate social performance and firm performance: An empirical examination of the role of time. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Honolulu, HI.
67. Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26, 24-36.
68. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4). 303-303.
69. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Substance and symbolism in CEO's long-term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (3). 367-390.
70. Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23 (1). 133-153.
71. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16 (4). 691-691.
72. Wood, D. J. (2000). Theory and integrity in business and society. Business & Society, 39 (4). 359-359.
73. Wood, D. J., & Jones, E. J. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3 (3). 229-267.
74. Wright, P., Ferris, S. P., Sarin, A., & Awasthi, V. (1996). Impact of corporate insider, block-holder, and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (2). 441-563.