Indicators of higher-education institutes and public-research organizations technology transfer activities: Insights from France

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 709-721

  Bach, Laurent ^a   Llerena, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LOUIS PASTEUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGHER EDUCATION; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 41449096413     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234207X270073     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adnot, P, 2006. Rapport d'information fait au nom de la commission des Finances, du contrôle budgétaire et des compteséconomiques de la Nation sur la valorization de la recherche dans les universités. Document no 341, Annexe au procés-verbal de la séance du 10 mai 2006 de la Session Ordinaire 2005-2006 du Sénat, Paris.
2. Arundel, A and C Bordoy 2006a. Final report: the 2006 ASTP survey. Report produced for the Association of European Science and Technology Transfer Professionals, MERIT, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
3. Arundel, A and C Bordoy 2006b. Developing internationally comparable indicators for the commercialization of publicly-funded research. Paper presented at the OECD Blue Sky II 2006 Forum entitled What Indicators for Science, Technology and Innovation Policies in the 21st Century?, Ottawa, Canada, 25-27 September.
4. Assemblée Nationale, 2005. First implementation of the New Law on budgeting - LOLF. Available (in French) at , last accessed 23 December 2007.
5. Assemblée Nationale 2006. New Law on research and Parlimentary reports and debates. Available (in French) at , last accessed 23 December 2007.
6. Azagra-Caro, J, N Carayol and P Llerena 2006. Patent production at a European research university: exploratory evidence at the laboratory level. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(3), May, 257-268.
7. BETA, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée 2006. La valorisation de la recherche universitaire frangaise: enquête 2005. Rapport rédigé par le BETA. Available (in French) at , last accessed 23 December 2007.
8. Bonaccorsi, A and C Daraio eds. 2007. Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation: Specialization and Performance in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
9. Bonaccorsi, A, C Daraio and B Lepori 2007. Indicators or the analysis of higher systems: some methodological reflections. In Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation: Specialization and Performance in Europe, eds. Bonaccorsi and Daraio, 405-432. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
10. Cohen, W M et al 2002. Links and impacts ; the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1-23.
11. Conesa, F et al 2005. ProTon Europe annual survey financial year 2004. Result report, EC WP 13 Interface Observatory.
12. Debackere, K and R Veugelers 2005. The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), April, 321-342.
13. DEST, Department of Education, Science and Training 2004. National survey of research commercialisation years 2001 and 2002: selected measures of commercialisation activity in universities and publicly funded research agencies. Canberra: Australian Government.
14. Documentation Française 2006. Documentation on the New Law on budgeting. Available (in French) at , last accessei-23 December 2007.
15. Goddard, J G and M Isabelle 2006. How do public laboratories collaborate with industry? new evidence from France. Paper presented at DRUID summer conference on Knowledge, Innovation and Competitiveness: Dynamics of Firms, Networks, Regions and Institutions, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark, 18-20 June.
16. Goktepe, D 2007. Identification of university inventors and university patenting patterns at Lund University: conceptual, methodological and empirical findings. MPRA (Munich Personal RePEc Archive) paper no 1628.
17. HEFCE, Higher Education Funding Council for England 2006. Higher education: business and community interaction survey 2003-04. Document 2006/25, July. Available at , last accessed 23 December 2007.
18. IGAENR, Inspection générale de l'administration de l'éducation nationale et de la recherche 2007. La mesure de la performance dans le cadre de la mise en ceuvre de la LOLF dans l'enseignement supérieur. MENESIR, July, Paris.
19. Langlois-Berthelot, M et al 2007. Rapport sur la valorisation de la recherche. Rapport de l'Inspection générale des finances (no 2006-M-016-01) et de l'Inspection générale de l'administration de l'dducation nationale et de (a recherche (no 2006-82), January, Paris.
20. Lissoni, F, P Llerena, M McKelvey and B Sanditov 2007. Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database. Paper presented at KEINS Workshop, MPE, léna, 19-20 March.
21. Matt, M and V Schaeffer 2007. The role of the technology transfer office of a large French scientific university: catalyst or manager? Paper presented at 2nd Workshop on the Process of Reform of University Systems, EIASM, Venice, 3-6 May.
22. Meyer-Krahmer, F and U Schmoch 1998. Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27, 835-852.
23. Molas-Gallart, J et al 2002. Measuring third stream activities. Final report to the Russell Group of Universities. Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex.
24. Mowery, D C and B N Sampat 2005. The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD government? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 115-127.
25. Mustar, P and P Laredo 2002. Innovation and research policy in France (1980-2000) or the disappearance of the Colbertist state. Research Policy, 31, 55-72.
26. OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2002. Benchmarking industry-science relationships. Paris: OECD.
27. OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2003, Turning science into business: patenting and licensing at public research organisations. Paris: OECD.
28. Phan, P H and D S Siegel 2006. The effectiveness of university technology transfer: lessons learned from qualitative and quantitative research in the U.S. and U.K. Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics, no 0609, April.
29. Polt, W, C Rammer, H Gassler, A Schibany and D Schartinger 2001. Benchmarking industry-science relations: the role of framework conditions. Science and Public Policy, 28(4), August, 247-258.
30. PREST, Policy Research in Engineering, Science and Technology 2002. The public research system in Europe: a comparative analysis of public, semi-public and recently privatised research centres, Part IV: country reports. Final project report to EC, CBSTII contract ERBHPV2-CT-200-01. Available at , last accessed 23 December 2007.
31. Read, C 2005. Survey of intellectual property commercialization in the higher education sector. Science, Innovation and Electronic Information Division working papers no 88FO006XIE: no 018. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
32. Salter, A J and B R Martin 2001. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research; a critical review", Research Policy 30, 509-532.
33. Sampat B.N., 2006, "Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh-Dole. Research Policy, 35(6), July, 772-789.
34. Schmoch, U 2004. The technological output of scientific institutions. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds. H F Moed, W Glanzel and U Schmoch, pp. 717-731. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35. Siegel, D S, D Waldman and A Link 2003. Assessing the impact of organisational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 27-48.
36. Slipersaeter, S and M Gulbrandsen 2007. Third mission and the entrepreneurial university model. In Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation: Specialization and Performance in Europe, eds. Bonaccorsi and Daraio, 112-143. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
37. Stevens, A J ed. 2005. AUTM U.S. licensing survey TM: FY 2004. Survey summary, prepared for Annual Meeting and Surveys, 2004-2006.
38. Thursby, J G and M C Thursby 2003. Industry/university licensing: characteristics, concerns and issues from the perspective of the buyer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, 207-213.
39. Thursby, J G et al 2001. Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: a survey of major US universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 59-72.
40. UNICO, The University Companies Association 2003. University commercialisation activities: annual survey financial year 2003. Cambridge UK: UNICO.