A theory-based innovation systems framework for evaluating diverse portfolios of research, part two: Macro indicators and policy interventions

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 731-741

  Hage, Jerald ^a   Jordan, Gretchen ^b   Mote, Jonathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INVESTMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; POLICY MAKING; SOCIAL THEORY; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 41449095855     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234207X265385     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aho, Esko, Jozef Comu, Luke Georghiou and Antoni Subira 2006. Creating an innovative Europe. Luke Georghiou ed. Brussels: European Commission.
2. Aldrich, Howard E 1979. Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Ambrosini, V 2001. Tacit knowledge: some suggestions for operationalization. The Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 811.
4. Anderson, Philip and Michael L Tushman 1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 604-633.
5. Arnold, Erik 2004. Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations. Research Evaluation, 13(1), 3-17.
6. Balachandra, Ravi and John H Friar 1997. Factors for success in R&D projects and new product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 276-287.
7. Boesman, William C 1997. Analysis of Ten Selected Science and Technology Policy Studies. Washington DC: Science Policy Research Division, Congressional Research Service.
8. Bozeman, Barry 2000. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627-655.
9. Bozeman, Barry 2002. Public-value failure: when efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 145-161.
10. Brown, John Seely 2000. The Social Life of Information. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
11. Brown, Shona L and Kathleen M Eisenhardt 1995. Product development: past research, present findings and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343-378.
12. Browning, Larry D, Janice M Beyer and Judy C Shetler 1995. Building cooperation in a competitive industry: Sematech and the semiconductor industry. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 113.
13. Cohen, Michael D and Lee S Sproull 1995. Organizational Learning. Newbury Park CA: Sage.
14. Collins, Francis S, Michael Morgan and Aristides Patrinos 2003. The Human Genome Project: lessons from large-scale biology. Science, 300(5617), 286-290.
15. Conner, Kathleen R and C K Prahalad 1996. A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477-501.
16. David, Paul A and Dominique Foray 1995. Assessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. STI Review, 16, 13-68.
17. Feller, Irwin 2002. Performance measurement redux. The American Journal of Evaluation, 23(4), 435.
18. Garcia, Rosanna and Roger Calantone 2002. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110-132.
19. Gibbons, Michael 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
20. Guerrieri, Paolo and Andrew Tylecote 1998. Interindustry differences in technical change and national patterns of technological accumulation. In Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, ed. Charles Edquist, pp. 108-129. London: Pinter.
21. Hage, Jerald 1980. Theories of Organizations: Form, Process, and Transformation. New York: Wiley.
22. Hage, Jerald 1999. Organizational innovation and organizational change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 597-622.
23. Hage, Jerald and J Rogers Hollingsworth 2000. A strategy for the analysis of idea innovation networks and institutions. Organization Studies, 21(5), 971-1004.
24. Hage, Jerald, Gretchen B Jordan and Jonathon Mote 2007. R&D integration: how to build a diverse and integrated knowledge community. Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Portland International Center for the Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET 2007), Portland OR, August.
25. Hagstrom, Warren O 1965. The Scientific Community. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
26. Hollingsworth, J Rogers 2000. Doing institutional analysis: implications for the study of innovations. Review of International Political Economy, 7(4), 595-644.
27. Jordan, Gretchen B 2005. What matters to R&D workers. Research Technology Management, 48(3), 23-32.
28. Jordan, Gretchen B 2006. Factors influencing advances in basic and applied research: variation due to diversity in research profiles. In Innovation, Science and Institutional Change, ed. Jerald and Marius Meeus Hage, pp. 173-195. London: Oxford University Press.
29. Jordan, Gretchen B, L Devon Streit and J Stephen Binkley 2003. Assessing and improving the effectiveness of national research laboratories. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(2), 228-235.
30. Jordan, Gretchen B, Jerald Hage, Jonathon Mote and Bradford Hepler 2005. Investigating differences among research projects and implications for managers. R & D Management, 35(5), 501-511.
31. Jordan, Gretchen B, Jerald T Hage and Jonathon Mote forthcoming. A theories-based systemic framework for evaluating diverse portfolios of scientific work, part one: micro and meso indicators. New Directions for Evaluation.
32. Judge, William Q, Gerald E Fryxell and Robert S Dooley 1997. The new task of R&D management: creating goal-directed communities for innovation. California Management Review, 39(3), 4-85.
33. Kim, J and D Wilemon 2003. Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD projects. R&D Management, 33(1), 16-30.
34. Kline, Stephen J and Nathan Rosenberg 1986. An overview of innovation. In The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, eds. R Landau and N Rosenberg, pp. 275-306. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
35. Larson, Erik W and David H Gobeli 1989. Significance of project management structure on development success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36(2), 119-125.
36. Leifer, Richard, Christopher M McDermott, Gina Colarelli O'Connor, Lois S. Peters, Mark Rice and Robert W Veryzer 2000. Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
37. Liebeskind, Julia Porter, Amalya Lumerman Oliver, Lynne Zucker and Marilynn Brewer 1996. Social networks, learning, and flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science, 7(4), 428-443.
38. Malerba, Franco and Luigi Orsenigo 1997. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 83-117.
39. Malinowski, Michael J and N Littlefield 1999. Transformation of a research platform into commercial products: the impact of United States federal policy on biotechnology. In The Commercialization of Genetic Research: Ethical, Legal and Policy Issues, eds. Timothy A Caulfield and Bryn Williams-Jones, pp. 29-53. Norwell MA: Kluwer Academic Press.
40. Malo, Stéphane and Aldo Geuna 2000. Science-technology linkages in an emerging research platform: the case of combinatorial chemistry and biology. Scientometrics, 47(2), 303-321.
41. Martin, Stephen and John T Scott 2000. The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 437-447.
42. McDermott, Christopher M and Gina Colarelli O'Connor 2002. Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(6), 424-438.
43. McGeary, H, G Michael and E Kathi Hanna 2004. Strategies to Leverage Research Funding: Guiding DOD's Peer Reviewed Medical Research Programs. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
44. Meeus, Marius and Jerald Hage 2006. Product and process innovation, scientific research, knowledge dynamics and institutional change: an introduction. In Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change: A Research Handbook, eds. J Hage and M Meeus, pp. 1-22. London: Oxford University Press.
45. Miller, William L and Langdon Morris 1999. Fourth Generation R&D: Managing Knowledge, Technology, and Innovation. New York: John Wiley.
46. Mohrman, Susan A, Jay R Galbraith and Peter Monge 2006. Network attributes impacting the generation and flow of knowledge within and from the basic science community. In Innovation Science and Industrial Change: A Research Handbook, ed. Jerald Hage and Marius Meeus, pp. 196-216. London: Oxford University Press.
47. Molas-Gallart, Jordi 2006. Toward theory-led evaluation: the experience of European science, technology, and innovation policies. The American Journal of Evaluation, 27(1), 64-82.
48. Mote, Jonathon E, Gretchen B Jordan and Jerald Hage forthcoming. Measuring radical innovation in real time. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management.
49. Nelson, Richard R ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Niosi, Jorge 2002. National systems of innovations are 'x-efficient' (and x-effective): why some are slow learners. Research Policy, 31(2), 291-302.
51. Nooteboom, Bart 1999. Inter-Firm Alliances: Analysis and Design. London: Routledge.
52. Pavitt, Keith 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 16(6), 343-373.
53. Powell, Walter W 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12(1), 295-336.
54. Raz, Tzvi, Aaron J Shenhar, and Dov Dvir 2002. Risk management, project success, and technological uncertainty. R&D Management, 32(2), 101-109.
55. Roco, Mihail C 2001. International strategy for nanotechnology research. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3(5), 353-360.
56. Roussel, Philip A, Kamal N Saad and Tamara J Erickson 1991. Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
57. Shackelford, Brandon 2007. U.S. R&D increased 6.0% in 2006 according to N.S.F. projections. Available at , last accessed 6 December 2007.
58. Shenhar, Aaron J 2001. One size does not fit all projects: exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3), 394-414.
59. Stokes, Donald E 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
60. TFFAI, Task Force on the Future of American Innovation 2005. The knowledge economy: is the United States losing its competitive edge. Report of the Task Force on the Future of American Innovation. Washington DC: TFFAI.
61. Tushman, Michael L and Thomas J Scanlan 1981. Boundary spanning individuals: their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 289-305.
62. Verhaeghe, Audrey and Rivka Kfir 2002. Managing innovation in a knowledge intensive technology organisation. R&D Management, 32(5), 409-417.