Patent and publication activities of German professors: An empirical assessment of their co-activity

Research Evaluation

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 311-319

  Czarnitzki, Dirk ^a,b   Glänzel, Wolfgang ^a,c   Hussinger, Katrin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH ZEW   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41449093294     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/095820207X254439     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Agrawal, A and R Henderson 2002 Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44-60.
2. Azoulay, P, W Ding and T Stuart 2006 The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research. NBER working paper 11917. Cambridge, MA.
3. Braun, T and W Glänzel 1990 United Germany: the new scientific superpower? Scientometrics, 19(22), 513-521.
4. Breschi, S, F Lissoni and F Montobbio 2006 The scientific productivity of academic inventors: new evidence from Italian data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, forthcoming.
5. Geuna, A and L J J Nesta 2006 University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35(6), 790-807.
6. Glänzel, W and M Meyer 2004 Patents cited in the scientific literature: an exploratory study of 'reverse' citation relations in the Triple Helix. Scientometrics, 58(2), 415-428.
7. Glänzel, W and H F Moed 2002 Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171-193.
8. Greene, W H 2003 Econometric Analysis, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
9. Hicks, D 2000 360 degree linkage analysis. Research Evaluation, 9(2), 133-143.
10. Holmes A and C Oppenheim 2001 Use of citation analysis to predict the outcome of the 2001 research assessment exercise for unit of assessment (UoA) 61: library and information management. Information Research, 6(2).
11. Kilger, C and K Bartenbach 2002 New rules for German professors. Science, 298(8), 1173-1175.
12. Markiewicz, K R and A DiMinin 2005 Commercializing the Laboratory: Faculty Patenting and the Open Science Environment. Working Paper, University of California.
13. Merton, R K 1973 The normative structure of science. In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, ed. R K Merton. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14. Meyer, M 2000 Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29(3), 409-434.
15. Meyer, M 2006 Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Research Policy, 35(10), 1646-1662.
16. Murray, F 2002 Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1389-1403.
17. Narin, F and E Noma 1985 Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 369-381.
18. Noyons, E C M, A F J van Raan, H Grupp and U Schmoch 1994 Exploring the science and technology interface - inventor author relations in laser medicine research. Research Policy, 23(4), 443-457.
19. Rosenberg, N 1998 Chemical engineering as a general purpose technology. In General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, ed. E Helpman, pp. 167-192. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20. Schmoch, U 2004 The technological output of scientific institutions. In Handbook of Quantitative science and Technology Research: the Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies on S&T Systems, eds. HFM Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch, pp. 717-731. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21. Schubert, A, W Glänzel and T Braun 1983 Relative citation rate: a new indicator for measuring the impact of publication. In Proceedings of the 1st National Conference with International Participation on Scientometrics and Linguistic of the Scientific Text, eds. D Tomov and L Dimitrova, pp. 80-81. Varna.
22. Scotchmer, S 2004 Innovation and incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Stephan, P, S Gurmu, A J Sumell and G Black 2006 Who's patenting in the university? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, forthcoming.
24. Stephan, P and S Levin 1992 Striking the Mother Lode in Science: the Importance of Age, Place and Time. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25. Stern, S 2004 Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Science, 50(6), 835-853.
26. Thursby, J G and M C Thursby 2002 Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90-104.
27. Thursby, M C, J G Thursby and S Mukherjee 2002 Are there real effects of licensing on academic research? A life cycle view. NBER Working Paper 11497, Cambridge, MA.
28. Van Looy, B, J Callaert and K Debackere 2006 Publication and patent behaviour of academic researchers: conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy, 35(4), 596-609.
29. Verbeek, M 2000 A Guide to Modern Econometrics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
30. Verspagen, B 2006 University research, intellectual property rights and European innovation systems. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(4), 607-632.
31. Wooldridge, J M 2002 Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.