Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of 'reverse' citation relations

Scientometrics

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 415-428

  Glänzel, Wolfgang ^a,b   Meyer, Martin ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^c SYO Finnish Inst for Entpr Mgmt   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243152865     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026248929668     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BHATTACHARYA, S., H. KRETSCHMER, M. MEYER (2003), Characterizing intellectual spaces between science and technology, Scientometrics, 58: 369-390.
2. BROOKS, H. (1994), The relationship between science and technology. Research Policy, 23: 477-486.
3. GLÄNZEL, W., A. SCHUBERT, T. BRAUN (2002), A relational charting approach to the world of basic research in twelve science fields at the end of the second millennium. Scientometrics, 55: 335-348.
4. GLÄNZEL, W., A. SCHUBERT (2003), Towards a new classification scheme of science areas with special regard to bibliometric evaluation purposes, Scientometrics, 56: 357-367.
5. GRUPP, H., U. SCHMOCH (1992), Wissenschaftsbindung der Technik. Panorama der internationalen Entwicklung und sektorales Tableau für Deutschland. Physica: Heidelberg.
6. GRUPP, H., U. SCHMOCH (1992), Perceptions of scientification of innovation as measured by referencing between patents and papers: dynamics in science-based fields of technology. In: H. GRUPP (Ed.). Dynamics of science-based innovation. Berlin: Springer.
7. HALL, B., A. JAFFE, M. TRAJTENBERG (2001), The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools, NBER Working Paper No. W8498.
8. HICKS, D. (2000), 360 Degree linkage analysis, Research Evaluation, 9: 133-143.
9. HICKS, D., T. BREITZMAN, D. OLIVASTRO, K. HAMILTON (2001), The changing composition of innovative activity in the US - a portrait based on patent analysis, Research Policy, 30: 681-703.
10. MEYER, M. (2000), Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature, Research Policy, 29: 409-434.
11. NARIN, F., E. NOMA (1985), Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7: 369-381.
12. NARIN, F., K. S. HAMILTON, D. OLIVASTRO (1995), Linkage between agency supported research and patented industrial technology. Research Evaluation, 5: 183-187.
13. NARIN, F., K. S. HAMILTON, D. OLIVASTRO (1997), The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26: 317-330.
14. PRICE, D. DE SOLLA (1981), The analysis of square matrices of scientometric transactions, Scientometrics, 3: 55-63.
15. SCHUBERT, A., S. ZSINDELY, T. BRAUN (1983), Scientometric analysis of attendance at international scientific meetings. Scientometrics, 5: 177-187.
16. SCHMOCH, U. (1993), Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics, 26: 193-211.
17. SMITH, K., A. EKLAND, E. IVERSEN, A. KALOUDIS, P. PATEL, R. NARULA (1998), Understanding Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators, IDEA-Report 5/1998, Oslo: STEP Group.
18. VERBEEK, A., K. DEBACKERE, M. LUWEL, P. ANDRIES, E. ZIMMERMANN, F. DELEUS (2002), Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes, Scientometrics, 54: 399-420.
19. ZIMAN, J. (1984), An Introduction to Science Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.