Use of sensitivity and uncertainty measures in distributed hydrological modeling with an application to the MIKE-SHE model

Water Resources Research

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 81-815

  Christiaens, K ^a   Feyen, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Hydrology; Measures; MIKE SHE; Sensitivity; Uncertainty; Unsaturated zone

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); GROUNDWATER; HYDROLOGY; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOILS;

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION;

WATER RESOURCES;

MODELING; POROUS MEDIUM; UNSATURATED MEDIUM;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VADOSE ZONE;

EID: 0036760698     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abbott, M. B., J. C. Bathurst, J. A. Cunge, P. E. O'Connell, and J. Rasmussen, An introduction to the European Hydrological System-Système Hydrologique Europeén, "SHE", 1, History and philosophy of a physically based, distributed modelling system, J. Hydrol., 87, 45-59, 1986a.
2. Abbott, M. B., J. C. Bathurst, J. A. Cunge, P. E. O'Connell, and J. Rasmussen, An introduction to the European Hydrological System - Système Hydrologique Européen, "SHE", 2, Structure of a physically based, distributed modelling system, J. Hydrol., 87, 61-77, 1986b.
3. Beven, K. J., Changing ideas in hydrology: The case of physically based models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157-172, 1989.
4. Beven, K., and A. Binley, The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Processes, 6, 279-298, 1992.
5. Bork, H.-R., and H. Rohdenburg, Transferable parameterization methods for distributed hydrological and agro-ecological catchment models, Catena, 13, 99-117, 1986.
6. Bork, H.-R., J. de Ploey, and A. Schick, Theory and Simulation of Infiltration, Overland Flow, Erosion, and Deposition Processes and their Relevance to Landscape Evolution, Paper Presented at Second International Conference on Geomorphology, Dtsche. Arbeitskreis für Geomorphol., Braunschweig, Germany, 1989.
7. Brooks, R. H., and A. T. Corey, Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media, Hydrol. Pap. 3, 27 pp., Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins, 1964.
8. Carsel, R. F., and R. S. Parrish, Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics, Water Resour. Res., 24, 755-770, 1988.
9. Conover, W. J., Practical Non-parametric Statistics, 462 pp., John Wiley, New York, 1971.
10. Djurhuus, J., S. Hansen, K. Schelde, and O. H. Jacobsen, Modelling mean nitrate leaching from spatially variable fields using effective hydraulic parameters, Geoderma, 87, 261-279, 1999.
11. Freer, J., K. Beven, and B. Ambroise, Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: An application of the GLUE approach, Water Resources Research, 32, 2161-2173, 1996.
12. Gupta, H. V., S. Sorooshian, and P. O. Yapo, Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information, Water Resour. Res., 34, 751-763, 1998.
13. Iman, R. L., and W. J. Conover, A distribution free approach to inducing rank correlations among input variables, Comm. Stat., B11, 311-334, 1982.
14. Iman, R. L., and J. C. Helton, A Comparison of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models, NUREG/CR-3904, SAND84-1461, Sandia Natl. Lab., Albuquerque, N.M., 1985.
15. Iman, R. L., J. M. Davenport, and D. K. Zeigler, Latin Hypercube Sampling (Program User's Guide), SAND79-1473, Sandia Natl. Lab., Albuquerque, N.M., 1980.
16. Janssen, P. H. M., W. Slob, and J. Rotmans, Gevoeligheidsanalyse en Onzekerheidsanalyse: Een Inventarisatie van Ideeën, Methoden en Technieken, Rep. 958805001, 119 pp., Natl. Inst. of Public Health and Environ. Prot., Bilthoven, Netherlands, 1990.
17. Janssen, P. H. M., P. S. C. Heuberger, and R. Sanders, UNCSAM 1.1: A Software Package for Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis-Manual, Rep. 959101004, Natl. Inst. of Public Health and Environ. Prot., Bilthoven, Netherlands, 1992.
18. Kleijnen, J. P. C., Sensitivity analysis and related analyses: A review of some statistical techniques, Paper Presented at International Symposium SAMO95, Eur. Comm. DGXII/F, Belgirate, Italy, 1995.
19. Melching, C. S., Reliability estimation, in Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, edited by V. P. Singh, pp. 69-118, Water Resour. Publ., Highlands Ranch, Colo., 1995.
20. Melching, C. S., and S. Anmangandla, Improved first-order uncertainty method for water quality modeling, J. Environ. Eng., 118(5), 791-805, 1992.
21. Meyer, P. D., M. L. Rockhold, and G. W. Gee, Uncertainty Analyses of Infiltration and Subsurface Flow and Transport for SDMP Sites, NUREG/ CR-6565, Pac. Northwest Natl. Lab., Richland, Wash., 1997.
22. Morgan, M. G., and M. Henrion, Uncertainty, A Guide to Dealing With Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, 332 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1990.
23. Parkin, G., G. O'Donnell, J. Ewen, J. C. Bathurst, P. E. O'Connell, and J. Lavabre, Validation of catchment models for predicting land-use and climate change impacts, 2, Case study for a Mediterranean catchment, J. Hydrol., 175, 595-613, 1996.
24. Rawls, W. J., and D. L. Brakensiek, Prediction of soil water properties for hydrologic modeling, in Proceedings of Watershed Management in the Eighties, pp. 293-299, Am. Soc. of Civ. Eng., New York, 1985.
25. Refsgaard, J. C., Terminology, modelling, protocol and classification of hydrological model codes, in Distributed Hydrological Modelling, edited by M. B. Abbott and J. C. Refsgaard, pp. 17-39, Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass., 1996.
26. Refsgaard, J. C., and B. Storm, MIKE SHE, in Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, edited by V. P. Singh, pp. 809-846, Water Resour. Publ., Highlands Ranch, Colo., 1995.
27. Refsgaard, J. C., M. Thorsen, J. B. Jensen, S. Kleeschulte, and S. Hansen, Large scale modelling of groundwater contamination from nitrate leaching, J. Hydrol., 221, 117-140, 1999.
28. Rogers, C. C, M., K. J. Beven, E. M. Morris, and M. G. Anderson, Sensi, tivity analysis, calibration and predictive uncertainty of the Institute of Hydrology Distributed Model, J. Hydrol., 81, 179-191, 1985.
29. Rohdenburg, H., U. Maniak, J. Hoyningen-Huene, and D. Sauerbeck, Wasser- und Stoffhaushalt Landwirtschaftlich Genutzer Einzugsgebiete unter Besondere Berücksichtigung von Substataufbau, Relief und Nutzungsform, Tichvorlagenband für das Kolloquium in Braunschweig 1983, Tech. Univ. Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany, 1983.
30. Rohdenburg, H. B., B. Diekkrüger, and H.-R. Bork, Deterministic hydrological site and catchment models for the analysis of agro-ecosystems, Catena, 13, 119-137, 1986.
31. Snee, R. D., Discussion on "Developments in linear regression methodology: 1959-1982,", Technometrics, 25 230-237, 1983.
32. Spear, R. C., and G. M. Hornberger, Eutrophication in Peel inlet, II, Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis, Water Resour. Res., 16, 43-90, 1980.
33. Spitz, K., and J. Moreno, A Practical Guide to Groundwater and Solute Transport Modeling, 461 pp., John Wiley New York, 1996.
34. Storm B., and A. Refsgaard, Distributed physically-based modelling of the entire land phase of the hydrological cycle, in Distributed Hydrological Modelling, edited by M. B. Abbott and J. C. Refsgaard, pp. 55-67, Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass., 1996.
35. van Genuchten, M. T., A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892-898, 1980.
36. Xevi, E., K. Christiaens A. Espino, W. Sewnandan, D. Mallants, H. Sørensen, and J. Feyen Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of the MIKE SHE model using the Neuenkirchen catchment as case study, Water Resour. Manage., 11, 219-242, 1997.