Dynamics modeling and performance evaluation of an autonomous underwater vehicle

Ocean Engineering

Volumn 31, Issue 14-15, 2004, Pages 1835-1858

  Evans, Jason ^a   Nahon, Meyer ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dynamics; Mission planning; Modeling; Performance evaluation; Underwater vehicle

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OCEANOGRAPHY; UNDERWATER EQUIPMENT; VEHICLES;

AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE (AUV); HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES;

OCEAN ENGINEERING;

AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE; HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE; HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

EID: 4143112486     PISSN: 00298018     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abbott I.H. Von Doenhoff A.E. Theory of Wing Sections 1959 Dover Publications
2. Allen H. Perkins E. Characteristics of Flow Over Inclined Bodies of Revolution, Research Memorandum RM A50L07 1951 National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA)
3. Cristi R. Papoulias F.A. Healey A.J. Adaptive sliding mode control of autonomous underwater vehicles in the dive plane IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 15 3 1990 152-160
4. Critzos C.C. Heyson H.H. Boswinkle R.W.Jr. Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 0012 Airfoil Section at Angles of Attack From 0° to 180°. National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA) Technical Note 3361 1955
5. Curtis T. Perrault D. Williams C. Bose N. C-SCOUT: a general-purpose AUV for systems research Underwater Technology 2000 73-77
6. Encarnacao P. Pascoal A. 3D path following for autonomous underwater vehicle 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2000 2977-2982
7. Ferguson J. Jackson E. Design of ARCS-autonomous remotely controlled submersible ROV 1984 Conference Proceedings 1984 365-368
8. Finck R. USAF Stability and Control DATCOM 1978 McDonald Douglas Corporation, Global Engineering Documents
9. Hopkin D. den Hertog V. The hydrodynamic testing and simulation of an autonomous underwater vehicle Second Canadian Marine Dynamics Conference 1993 274-281
10. Hopkins, E., 1951. A Semiempirical Method for Calculating the Pitching Moment of Bodies of Revolution at Low Mach Numbers. Research Memorandum RM A51C14, National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA).
11. Humphreys D.E. Smith N.S. Hydrodynamics and control of a streamlined UUV operating at 180-degree angle of attack 7th International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology 1991 171-190
12. Jorgensen, L., 1973. Prediction of Static Aerodynamic Characteristic for Space-Shuttle-Like and Other Bodies at Angles of Attack from 0° to 180°. NASA TN D-6996.
13. Mailfert G. LeMaire J. REDERMOR: an experimental platform for ROV/AUV field sea trials Oceans '98, vol. 1 1998 357-362
14. Marco D. Healey A. Current developments in underwater vehicle control and navigation: the NPS ARIES AUV Oceans 2000, vol. 2 2000 1011-1016
15. McCormick B.W. Aerodynamics, Aeronautics, and Flight Mechanics 1995 Wiley New York
16. Munk, M., 1924. The Aerodynamic Forces on Airship Hulls. Report No. 184, National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA).
17. Nahon M. A simplified dynamics model for autonomous underwater vehicles Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology, AUV '96 1996 373-379
18. Pennel V. Williams C.D. Bose N. Veitch B. Hawbolt K. Curtis T.L. Perrault D.E. O'Young S. Mukhtasor S.R. Husain T. Ferguson J. Eaton G. Reedeker P. Innovative approaches to environmental effects monitoring using an autonomous underwater vehicle International Workshop on Underwater Robotics for Sea Exploitation and Environmental Monitoring, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2001
19. Perrault, D., 2002. Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV) sensitivity of motion response to geometric and hydrodynamic parameters and AUV behaviors with control plane faults. Doctoral thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland.
20. Prestero T. Development of a six-degree of freedom simulation model for the REMUS autonomous underwater vehicle Oceans 2001, vol. 1 2001 450-455
21. Reigels F.W. Aerodynamische Profile 1958 R. Oldenbourg Muchen
22. Saunders, A., Nahon, M., 2002. The effect of forward vehicle velocity on through-body AUV tunnel thruster performance. In: Oceans 2002, vol. 1, pp. 250-259.
23. Thomas, R., 2003. Performance evaluation of the propulsion system of the autonomous underwater vehicle C-SCOUT. Master's thesis (in preparation), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland.
24. Wang H. Marks R. McLain T. Fleischer S. Miles D. Sapilewski G. Rock S. Otter: a testbed submersible for robotics research Proceedings of ANS 95 1995
25. Whitney J. Smith S. Observations on the dynamic performance of tunnel thrusters Oceans '98, vol. 2 1998 676-681