Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms

International Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 195-200

  Silber, Sigmund ^a   Dörr, Rolf ^a   Zindler, Gunnar ^a   Mühling, Holger ^a   Diebel, Thomas ^a  

^a Muller Hospital   (Germany)

Author keywords

ACC standard; Cardiac catheterization; CD ROM; Computer application; Coronary artery disease

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CD-ROM; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0343307115     PISSN: 01675273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-5273(97)00105-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Nissen SE, Pepine CJ, Bashore TM, Block PC, Bonchek LI, Brinker JA, Carabello B, Douglas Jr. JS, Elion JL, Hirshfeld Jr. JW, Holmes DR, Johnson WL, Klinke WP, Levin DC, Mancini GBJ, Mullins CE, Thomas JD, Topol EJ, Vogel JHK, Wondrow MA. Cardiac angiography without cine film. Erecting a Tower of Babel in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:834-7.
2. Nissen SE, ACC/ACR/NEMA ad hoc group et al. American College of Cardiology, American College of Radiology and industry develop standard for digital transfer of angiographic images. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:800-2.
3. Pelanek GA. DICOM Cardiology Exchange. In: Kennedy TE, Nissen SE, Simon R, Thomas JD, Tilkemeier PL, editors. Digital Cardiac Imaging in the 21st Century: A Primer. 1997:24-30.
4. Huffman DA. A method for the construction of minimum redundancy codes. Proc Inst Radio Eng 1952;40:1098-101.
5. Eigler N, Pfaff M, Whiting J, Thasana N, Forrester J. The role of digital angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 1986;10:3-13.
6. Simon R, Brennecke R, Heiss O, Meier B, Reiber H, Zeelenberg C. Report of the ESC Task Force on digital imaging in cardiology. Eur Heart J 1994;15:1332-4.
7. Gray JE, Wondrow MA, Smith HC, Holmes Jr. DR. Technical considerations for cardiac laboratory high-definition video systems. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1984;10:73-86.
8. Holmes Jr. DR, Smith HC, Gray JE, Wondron MA. Clinical evaluation and application of cardiac laboratory high-definition video systems. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1984;10:63-71.
9. Laboratory Performance Standards Committee. Interim standard: videotape recorders for transferring cardiac cinefluorographic studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1990;21:58-60.
10. Zerbst J, Becker T, Simon R. Filmless cardiac catheterization: are analog videodisks or videotapes adequate substitutes for the cinefilm?. Circulation 1995;92:I2.
11. Chamuleau SA, Hanekamp WB, Appelman YE, Koch KT, Peters RJ, Kok WE, la Rievière GA, David GK, Pick JJ. Analogue laser optical disc versus cinefilm angiography. A comparative study. Circulation 1995;92:I21.
12. Haase J, Preusler W, Göhring S, Semmler N, Kruse K, Schwarz F, Störger H, Reifart N. How reliable are computer-assisted geometric coronary measurements following laser-disc-archiving (LDA): A comparison with QCA on cinefilm. Circulation 1995;92:I22.
13. Ozaki Y, Keane D, Herrman JP, Foley D, Haase J, den Boer A, di Mario C, Serruys PW Coronary arteriography for quantitative analysis: Experimental and clinical comparison of cinefilm and video recordings. Am Heart J 1995;129:471-5.
14. Haase J, Nugteren SK, Montauban van Swijndregt E, Slager CJ, Di Mario C, de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW. Digital geometric measurements in comparison to cinefilm analysis of coronary artery dimensions. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;28:283-90.
15. Gurley JC, Nissen SE, Booth DC, Harrison M, Grayburn P, Elion JL, DeMaria AN. Comparison of simultaneously performed digital and film-based angiography in assessment of coronary artery disease. Circulation 1988;78:1411-20.
16. Onnasch DG, Prause GP, Ploger A. Objective methods for optimizing JPEG compression of coronary angiographic images. Int J Card Imaging 1995;11:151-62.
17. Elion JL, Whiting JS. Clinical use of lossy image compression in digital angiography. Am J Cardiol 1996;78:219-20.
18. Gillespy T IIIrd, Rowberg AH. Displaying radiologic images on personal computers: image storage and compression. J Digit Imaging 1994;7:1-12.
19. Koning G, van Meurs BA, Haas H, Reiber JHC. Effect of data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1995;34:175-85.
20. Yamamoto LG. Using JPEG image compression to facilitate telemedicine. Am J Emerg Med 1995;13:55-7.
21. Aberle DR, Gleeson F, Sayre JW, Brown K, Batra P, Young DA, Stewart BK, Ho BK, Huang HK. The effect of irreversible image compression on diagnostic accuracy in thoracic imaging. Invest Radiol 1993;28:398-403.
22. Sneiderman C, Schosser R, Pearson TG. A comparison of JPEG and FIF compression of color medical images for dermatology. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994;18:339-42.
23. Goldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW, Bhalla MP, Blickman JG, Bramson RT, Boland GW, Llewellyn HJ, Halpern E. Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:463-8.
24. Rigolin VH, Robiolio PA, Spero LA, Harrawood BP, Morris KG, Fortin DF, Baker WA, Bashore TM, Cusma JT. Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. Am J Cardiol 1996;78:131-5.
25. Koning G, Baretta P, Zwart P, Reiber JHC. Effect of lossy image compression on QCA results. Circulation 1995;92:I22.
26. Fritsch JP, Negwer F, Renneisen U, Brennecke R. Visual and quantitative analysis of coronary angiograms after irreversible data compression. Eur Heart J 1994;15:46.