Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 20-27

  Janhom, A ^a   Van der Stelt, P F ^a   Van Ginkel, F C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Digital imaging, dental; Imaging processing, computer assisted; Perception; Roc curve

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL CARIES; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ARTIFACTS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENTAL CARIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROC CURVE; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0033748352     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600488     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, van Ginkel FC, Geraets WGM. Effect of noise on the compressionessibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 6-12.
2. Persons K, Palisson P, Manduca A, Erickson BJ, Savcenko V. An analytical look at the effects of compression on medical images. J Digit Imaging 1997; 10: 60-66.
3. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research (review). Br Med J 1995; 311: 376-380.
4. Metz CE. Quantification of failure to demonstrate statistical significance: the usefulness of confidence intervals. Invest Radiol 1993; 28: 59-63.
5. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24: 234-245.
6. Metz CE, Wang P-L, Krohman HB. A new approach for testing the significance of differences between ROC curves measured. from correlated data. In: Deconinck F (ed). Information processing in medical imaging. The Hague: Nijhoff. 1984, pp 432-445.
7. Stheeman SE, van't Hof MA, Mileman PA, van der Stelt PF. Use of the Delphi technique to develop standards for quality assessment in diagnostic radiology. Community Dent Health 1995; 12: 194-199.
8. Price C, Ergül N. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26: 45-52.
9. Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Borg E, Gröndahl H-G. Impact of lossy image compression on accuracy of caries detection in digital images taken with a storage phosphor system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo 1996; 81: 351-355.
10. Sanderink GCH, Dula K, Huiskens R, van der Stelt PF. The loss of image quality in digital panoramic radiography using image compression. In: Farman AG, Ruprecht A, Gibbs SJ, Scarfe WC, (eds). Advances in Maxillofacial Imaging. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1997; pp 299-305.
11. van der Stelt PF, Sanderink GCH, Dula K, Huiskens R. Lossy file compression and diagnostic image quality of digital intraoral radiographic images. J Dent Res 1997; 76 (special issue): 140 (Abstract 1010).