ParCrys: A Parzen window density estimation approach to protein crystallization propensity prediction

Bioinformatics

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 901-907

  Overton, Ian M ^a   Padovani, Gianandrea ^b   Girolami, Mark A ^b   Barton, Geoffrey J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRYSTALLIZATION; DIFFRACTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICS;

EID: 41349121172     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn055     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Altschul,S. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402.
2. Apweiler,R. et al. (2004) UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D115-D119.
3. Barton,G.J. and Stemberg,M.J.E. (1987) A strategy for the rapid multiple alignment of protein sequences: Confidence levels from tertiary structure comparisons. J. Mol. Biol., 198, 327.
4. Berman,H. et al. (2007) The worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB): ensuring a single, uniform archive of PDB data. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D301-D303.
5. Biertumpfel,C. et al. (2005) Practical implementations for improving the throughput in a manual crystallization setup. J. Appl. Cryst., 38, 568-570.
6. Brenner,S.E. (2000) Target selection for structural genomics. Nat. Struct. Biol., 7, 967-969.
7. Burley,S. et al. (1999) Structural genomics: Beyond the human genome project. Nat. Genet., 23, 151-157.
8. Canaves,J.M. et al. (2004) Protein biophysical properties that correlate with crystallisation success in Thermotoga maritima: Maximum clustering strategy for structural genomics. J. Mol. Biol., 344 977-991.
9. Chandonia,J.M. and Brenner,S.E. (2005) Implications of structural genomics target selection strategies: Pfam5000, whole genome, and random approaches. Proteins, 58, 166-179.
10. Chandonia,J.-M. and Brenner,S.E. (2006) The impact of structural genomics: Expectations and outcomes. Science, 311, 347-351.
11. Chandonia,J.M. et al. (2006) Target selection and deselection at the berkeley structural genomics centre. Proteins, 62, 356-370.
12. Chayen,N.E. (2004) Turning protein crystallisation from an art into a science. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 14, 577-583.
13. Chen,K. et al. (2007) Prediction of protein crystallization using collocation of amino acid pairs. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 355, 764.
14. Chen,L. et al. (2004) TargetDB: A target registration database for structural genomics projects. Bioinformatics, 20, 2860-2862.
15. Davies,T.G. et al. (2002) Structure-based design of a potent purine-based cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 9, 745.
16. Diprose,J.M. et al. (2001) Translocation portals for the substrates and products of a viral transcription complex: The bluetongue virus core. EMBO J., 20, 7229-7239.
17. Duda,R. and Hart,P. (1973) Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis Wiley, London.
18. Eddy,S.R. (1998) Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics, 14, 755-763.
19. Engelman,D.M. et al. (1986) Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem., 15, 321-353.
20. Finn,R.D. et al. (2006) Pfam: Clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D247 D251.
21. Galassi,M. et al. (2006) GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual - Revised, 2nd edn. Network Theory Ltd.
22. Goh,C. et al. (2004) Mining the Structural genomics pipeline: identification of protein properties that affect high-throughput experimental analyses. J. Mol. Biol., 336, 115-130.
23. Guyon,I. and Elisseef,A. (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 1157-1182.
24. Hiu,R. and Edwards,E. (2003) High-throughput protein crystallisation. J. Struct. Biol., 142, 154-161.
25. Hol,W. (2000) Structural genomics for science and society. Nat. Struct. Biol., 7, 964-966.
26. Liu,J. et al. (2004) Automatic target selection for structural genomics on eukaryotes. Proteins, 56, 188-200.
27. Overton,I.M. and Barton,G.J. (2006) A normalised scale for structural genomics target ranking: The OB-Score. FEBS Lett., 580, 4005.
28. Parzen,E. (1962) On estimation of a probability density function and mode. Ann. Math. Stat., 33, 1065-1076.
29. Poppe,S.M. et al. (1997) Antiviral activity of the Dihydropyrone PNU-140690, a new nonpeptide himan immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 41, 1059-1063.
30. Puesy,M. et al. (2005) Life in the fast lane for protein crystallization and X-ray crystallography. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 88, 359-386,.
31. R Development Core Team (2004) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
32. Rice,P. et al. (2000) EMBOSS: The european molecular biology opeil software suite. Trends Genet., 16, 276-277.
33. Rost,B. (1999) Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng., 12, 85-94.
34. Savchenko,A. et al. (2003) Strategies for structural proteomics of prokaryotes: Quantifying the advantages of studying orthologous proteins and of using. both NMR and x-ray crystallography approaches. Proteins 50, 392-399.
35. Schuttelkopf,A.W. et al. (2006) Screening-based discovery and structural dissection of a novel family 18 chitinase Inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem., 281, 27278-27285.
36. Service,R. (2002) Tapping DNA for structures produces a trickle. Science, 298, 948-950.
37. Service,R. (2005) Structural genomics, round 2. Science, 307 1554-1558.
38. Shapiro,L. and Harris,T. (2000) Finding function through structural genomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 11, 31.
39. Singh,S.K. et al. (2006) Structural basis for duffy recognition by the malaria parasite duffy-binding-like domain. Nature, 439, 741.
40. Smialowski,P. et al. (2006) Will my protein crystallize? A sequence-based predictor. Proteins: Struct., Funct. Bioinformatics 62, 343-355.
41. Stajich,J.E. et al. (2004) The bioperl toolkit: Perl modules for the life sciences. Genome Res., 12, 1611-1618.
42. Stevens,R.C. et al. (2001) Global efforts in structural genomics. Science, 294, 89-92.
43. Terwillinger,T.C. (2000) Structural genomics in North America. Nat. Struct. Biol., 7, 935-939.
44. Todd,A.E. et al. (2005) Progress of structural genomics initiatives: An analysis of solved target structurcs. J. Mol. Biol. 348, 1235.
45. von Itzstein,M. et al. (1993) Rational design of potent sialidase-based inhibitors of influenza virus replication. Nature, 363, 418.
46. Wan,H. and Wootton,J.C. (2000) A global compositional complexity measure for biological sequences: AT-rich and GC-rich genomes encode less complex proteins. Comput. Chem., 24, 71.
47. Wang,G. and Dunbrack,R. (2003) PISCES: A protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics, 19, 1589-1591.
48. Yard,B.A. et al. (2007) The structure of serine palmitoyltransferase; gateway to sphingolipid biosynthesis. J. Mol. Biol., 370, 870-886.
49. Zarembinski,T.I. et al. (1998) Structure-based assignment of the biochemical function of a hypothetical protein: A test case of structural gienomics. PNAS, 95, 15189-15193.