The privileged role of the late-night joke: Exploring humor's role in disrupting argument scrutiny

Media Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 119-142

  Young, Dannagal Goldthwaite ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41249102542     PISSN: 15213269     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15213260701837073     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Annenberg Public Policy Center (2004). Daily Show viewers knowledgeable about presidential campaign, National Annenberg Election Survey shows. Philadelphia: Author.
2. Apter, M. J. (1982). The experience of motivation: The theory of psychological reversals. London: Academic Press.
3. Attardo, S. (1997). The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor. Humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 10, 395-420.
4. Attardo, S. (2003). Introduction: The pragmatics of humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1287-1294.
5. Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 4, 293-347.
6. Baddeley, A. (1998). Human memory. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Bergson, H. (1956). Laughter. In G. Meredith (Ed.), Comedy. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
8. Bihrle, A., Brownell, H., & Gardner, H. (1986). Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left- and right-brain damaged patients. Brain and Cognition, 5, 399-411.
9. Bless, H. (2001). Mood and the use of general knowledge structures. In L. L. Marin & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guide (pp. 9-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Bless, H., Bohner, G., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1990). Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 331-345.
11. Cacioppo, J. T., Glass, C. R., & Merluzzi, T. V. (1979). Self-statements and self-evaluations: A cognitive-response analysis of heterosocial anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3, 249-262.
12. Chaffee, S. H., Zhao, X., & Leshner, G. (1994). Political knowledge and the campaign media of 1992. Communication Research, 21, 305-324.
13. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
14. Cline, T. W., & Kellaris, J. J. (1999). The joint impact of humor and argument strength in a print advertising context: A case for weaker arguments. Psychology and Marketing, 16, 69-86.
15. Converse, P. (1962). Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 578-599.
16. Coulson, S. (2000). Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Coulson, S., & Kutas, M. (2001). Getting it: Human event-related brain response in good and poor comprehenders. Neuroscience Letters, 316, 71-74.
18. Coulson, S., & Lovett, C. (2004). Handedness, hemispheric asymmetries, and joke comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 275-288.
19. Coulson, S., & Williams, R. F. (2005). Hemispheric asymmetries and joke comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 43, 128-141.
20. Cunningham, S. J., Milne, A. B., & Crawford, J. R. (2007). The effects of acute alcohol intoxication on person memory: The stereotypical drunk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1, 181-199.
21. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Williams, B. (2001). Let us entertain you: Politics in the new media environment. In L. Bennett & R. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 160-191). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt.
23. Gasper, K. (2004). Do you see what I see? Affect and visual information processing. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 405-421.
24. Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global v. local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34-40.
25. Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). Irony interpretation: The graded salience hypothesis. Humor, 12, 425-456.
26. Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 183-206.
27. Goel V., & Dolan R. J. (2001). The functional anatomy of humor: Segregating cognitive and affective components. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 237-238.
28. Graesser, A., & Mandler, G. (1978). Limited processing capacity constrains the storage of unrelated sets of words and retrieval from natural categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 86-100.
29. Hollander, B., (1995). The new news and the 1992 presidential campaign: Perceived v. actual political knowledge. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 786-798.
30. Hollander, B., (2005). Late-night learning: Do entertainment programs increase political campaign knowledge for young viewers? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 49, 402-415.
31. Isen, A. M. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 203-252). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32. Isen, A. M. (2001). An influence of positive affect on decision making in complex situations: Theoretical issues with practical implications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11, 75-85.
33. Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., & Hannequin, D. (1990). Right hemisphere and verbal communication. New York: Springer-Verlag.
34. King, J., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376-395.
35. Kluender, R., & Kutas, M (1993). Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 196-214.
36. Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. London: Hutchinson and Co.
37. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 448-468.
38. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-204.
39. La Fave, L. (1961). Humor judgments as a function of reference group: An experimental study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
40. La Fave, L. (1972). Humor judgments as a function of reference groups and identification classes. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The Psychology of Humor (pp. 195-210). New York: Academic Press.
41. Lee, A., & Sternthal, B. (1999). The effects of positive mood on memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 115-127.
42. Lyttle, J. (2001). The effectiveness of humor in persuasion: The case of business ethics training. Journal of General Psychology, 128, 206-216.
43. Mackie, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1989). Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 27-40.
44. Mackie, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1991). Feeling good but not thinking straight: The impact of positive mood on persuasion. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgment (pp. 201-220). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
45. Markiewicz, D. (1975). Effects of humor on persuasion. Sociometry, 37, 407-422.
46. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
47. Moran, C. C. (1996). Short-term mood change, perceived funniness, and the effect of humor stimuli. Behavioral Medicine, 22, 32-38.
48. Moran, J. M., Wig, G. S., Adams, R. B., Janata, P., & Kelley, W. M., (2004). Neural correlates of humor appreciation and detection. NeuroImage, 21, 1055-1061.
49. Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2006). Priming effects of late-night comedy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 198-210.
50. Nabi, R. L., Moyer-Guse, E., & Byrne, S. (2007). All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs, 74, 29-54.
51. Niven, D., Lichter, S. R., & Amundson, D. (2003). The political content of late-night comedy. Press/Politics, 8, 118-133.
52. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
53. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer/Verlag.
54. Petty, R. E., Priester, J. R., & Brinol, P. (2002). Mass media attitude change: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in Theory and Research (2nd ed., pp. 155-198). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
55. Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high and low elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 5-20.
56. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2000, February). Audiences Fragmented and Skeptical: The tough job of communicating with voters [Online Report], Available at http://www.people-press.org/jan00rpt2. htm
57. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2002, June). Public's news habits little changed since September 11. [On-line Report]. Available at http://peoplepress.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=156
58. Pfau, M., Cho, J., & Chong, K. (2001). Communication forms in U.S. presidential campaigns: Influences on candidate perceptions and the democratic process. Press/Politics, 6, 88-105.
59. Priest, R. F. (1966). Election jokes: The effects of reference group membership. Psychological Reports, 18, 600-602.
60. Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing.
61. Rolls. E. T. (1996). The orbitofrontal cortex. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 351, 1433-1444
62. Rolls, E. T. (2000). The orbitofrontal cortex and reward. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 284-294.
63. Rothbart, M., Fulero, S., Jensen, C., Howard, J., & Birrel, P. (1978). From individual to group impressions: Availability heuristics in stereotype formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 237-255.
64. Schmidt, S. R. (1991). Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? Memory and Cognition, 19, 523-542.
65. Schmidt, S. R. (1994). Effects of humor on sentence memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 953-967.
66. Schmidt, S. R. (2001). Memory for humorous cartoons. Memory and Cognition, 29, 305-311.
67. Schmidt, S. R. (2002). The humour effect: Differential processing and privileged retrieval. Memory, 10, 127-138.
68. Schultz, W., Tremblay, L. & Hollerman, J. R. (2000). Reward processing in primate orbitofrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 272-284.
69. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., & Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 161-197). New York: Academic Press.
70. Shammi, P., & Stuss, D. T. (1999). Humour appreciation: A role of the right frontal lobe. Brain, 122, 657-666.
71. Sherman, J. W., Lee, A. Y., Bessenoff, G. R., & Frost, L. A. (1998). Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 589-606.
72. Smith, S. M. (1993). Does humor in advertising enhance systematic processing? In L. McAlister & M. L. Rothschild (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 155-158). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
73. Sternthal, B., & Craig, S. (1973). Humor in advertising. Journal of Marketing, 37, 12-18.
74. Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The Psychology of Humor (pp. 81-100). New York: Academic Press.
75. Taylor, S. E. (1981). The interface of cognitive and social psychology. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 189-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
76. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging probability and frequency. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
77. Vaid, J., Hulla, R., Herediab, R., Gerkensa, D., & Martinez, F. (2003). Getting a joke: The time course of meaning activation in verbal humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1431-1449.
78. Weinberger, M. G., & Gulas, C. S. (1992). The impact of humor in advertising: A review. Journal of Advertising, 21, 35-59.
79. Weise, R. E. (1996). Partisan perceptions of political humor. Humor, 9, 199-207.
80. Worth, L. T., & Mackie, D. M. (1987). Cognitive mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Social Cognition, 5, 76-94.
81. Wyer, R. S., & Collins II, J. E. (1992). A theory of humor elicitation. Psychological Review, 99, 663-688.
82. Young, D. G. (2004). Late-night comedy in election 2000: Its influence on candidate trait ratings and the moderating effects of political knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48, 1-22.
83. Young, D. G. (2006). Late-night comedy and the salience of the candidates' caricatured traits in the 2000 election. Mass Communication and Society, 9, 339-366.
84. Young, D. G., & Tisinger, R. (2006). Dispelling late-night myths: News consumption among late-night comedy viewers and the predictors of exposure to various late-night shows. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11, 113-134
85. Zhang, Y. (1996). Responses to humorous advertising: The moderating effect of need for cognition. The Journal of Advertising, 25, 15-32