Coping with on-the-job writing in ESL: A constructivist-semiotic perspective

Language Learning

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 143-175

  Parks, Susan ^a   Maguire, Mary H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033463990     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00073     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Anson, C. M., & Forsberg, L. L. (1990). Moving beyond the academic community: Transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication, 7, 200-231.
2. Bazerman, C. (1988). Scientific writing as a social act: A review of the literature of the sociology of science. In P. V. Anderson, J. R. Brockmann, & C. R. Miller (Eds.), New essays in technical and scientific communication: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 156-184). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
3. Beaufort, A. (1997). Operationalizing the concept of discourse community: A case study of one institutional site of composing. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 486-529.
4. Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-34.
5. Belcher, D., & Braine, G. (Eds.). (1995). Academic writing in a second language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10, 475-509.
7. Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-based second language instruction. New York: Newbury House/Harper Row.
8. Bruffee, K. (1986). Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographical essay. College English, 48, 773-790.
9. Cameron, R., & Williams, J. (1997). Senténce to Ten Cents: A case study of relevance and communicative success in nonnative-native speaker interactions in a medical setting. Applied Linguistics, 18, 415-445.
10. Clark, C., & Doheny-Farina, S. (1990). Public discourse and personal expression: A case study in theory-building. Written Communication, 7, 456-481.
11. Cooper, M. M., & Holzman, M. (Eds.). (1983). Writing as social action. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
12. Couture, B., & Rymer, J. (1991). Discourse interaction between writer and supervisor: A primary collaboration in workplace writing. In M. Lay & W. Karis (Eds.), Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice (pp. 87-108). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
13. Cross, G. A. (1990). A Bakhtinian exploration of factors affecting the collabo-rative writing of an executive letter of an annual report. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 173-203.
14. Cumming, A. (1990). Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482-511.
15. Dautermann, J. (1993). Negotiating meaning in a hospital discourse community. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 98-110). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
16. Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
17. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Faigley, L. (1985). Nonacademic writing: The social perspective. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 231-247). New York: Guilford.
19. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Forman, E., & Cazden, C. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Forman, J. (1992). New visions of collaborative writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
22. Freedman, A. (1987). Learning to write again. Carleton Papers in Applied Language Studies, 4, 95-116.
23. Freedman, A. (1994). "Do as I say": The relationship between teaching and learning new genres. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
24. Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (Eds.). (1994). Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
25. Goldstein, T. (1997). Two languages at work: Bilingual life on the factory floor. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
26. Gunnarsson, B. L. (1993, August). Studies of language for specific purposes - A biased view on a rich reality. Paper presented at the 10th World Congress of the International Association of Applied Linguistics, Amsterdam.
27. Gunnarsson, B. L. (1997). The writing process from a sociolinguistic view-point. Written Communication, 14, 139-188.
28. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). London: Oxford University Press.
29. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
30. Hirvela, A. (1997). Disciplinary portfolios and EAP writing instruction. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 83-100.
31. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Lantolf, J., & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian perspectives on second language research. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds). Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1-32). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1996). Practice, person, social world. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 143-151). London: Routledge.
34. Lay, M., & Karis, W. (1991). Collaborative writing in industry: Investigation in theory and practice. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
35. Lefevre, J. (1987). Invention as a social act. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
36. Locker, K. (1992). What makes a collaborative writing team successful? A case study of lawyers and social service workers in a state agency. In J. Forman (Ed.), New visions of collaborative writing (pp. 37-62). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
37. MacKinnon, J. (1993). Becoming a rhetor: Developing writing ability in a mature, writing-intensive organization. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 98-110). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
38. Maguire, M. H. (1994). Getting beyond programmes and instructional time in second-language teaching and learning: Who is mediating what? For whom? In what context? Journal of the CAAL, 16(1), 105-123.
39. Maguire, M. H. (1997). Shared and negotiated territories: The socio-cultural embeddedness of children's acts of meaning. In M. Pollard, D. Thiessen, & A. Filer (Eds.), Children and their curriculum. London: Falmer Press.
40. Maguire, M. H. (1999). A bilingual child's choices and voices: Lessons in noticing, listening and understanding. In E. Franklin, I. Serena, & J. Rupp (Eds.), Reading and writing in more than one language. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
41. Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
42. Mohan, B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Context and cooperation in academic tasks. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Moll, L. (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of socio-historical psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Nystrand, M., Doyle, A., & Himley, M. (1986). A critical examination of the doctrine of autonomous texts. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers (pp. 81-108). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
45. Paradis, J., Dobrin, D., & Miller, R. (1985). Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the writing environment of an R&D organization. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 281-307). New York: Guilford.
46. Pare, A. (1991). Writing in social work: A case study of a discourse community. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
47. Pare, A. (1993). Discourse regulations and the production of knowledge. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 111-123). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
48. Pare, A., & Smart, G. (1994). Observing genres in action: Towards a research methodology. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.
49. Parks, S. (1995). Development of professional writing skills by non-native English-speaking nurses in an English-medium hospital: A constructivist semiotic perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
50. Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 9-31.
51. Peirce, B., Harper, H., & Burnaby, B. (1993). Workplace ESL at Levi Strauss: "Dropouts" speak out. TESL Canada Journal, 10(2), 9-30.
52. Pettinari, C. (1988). Task, talk and text in the operating room: A study in medical discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
53. Reither, J., & Vipond, D. (1989). Writing as collaboration. College English, 51, 855-867.
54. Schryer, C. (1993). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10, 200-234.
55. Silva, T., Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1997). Broadening the perspective of main-stream composition studies: Some thoughts from the disciplinary margins. Written Communication, 14, 398-428.
56. Smart, G. (1992). Exploring the social dimension of a workplace genre and the implications for teaching. Carleton Papers in Applied Language Studies, 9, 33-46.
57. Smart, G. (1993). Genre as community invention: A central bank's response to its executives' expectations as readers. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 207-219). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
58. Spilka, R. (1993). Influencing workplace practice: A challenge for professional writing specialists in academia. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 207-219). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
59. Sullivan, P., & Porter, J. (1993). On theory, practice, and method: Toward a heuristic research methodology for professional writing. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 220-237). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
60. Svendsen, C., & Krebs, K. ( 1984). Identifying English for jobs: Examples from health care occupations. ESP Journal, 3, 153-164.
61. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language development (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
62. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Swales, J. (1993). Genre and engagement. Revue belge de philologie et de l'histoire, 71, 687-698.
64. Swales, J. (1996). Teaching the conference abstract. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Today and tomorrow (pp. 45-59). Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University Press.
65. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67. Winsor, D. (1989). An engineer's writing and the corporate construction of knowledge. Written Communication, 6, 270-285.
68. Witte, S. (1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9, 237-308.
69. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 66, 181-191.
70. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design & methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.