Strategy instruction in primary content textbooks

Reading Teacher

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 254-261

  Kragler, Sherry ^a   Walker, Carolyn A ^b   Martin, Linda E ^b  

^a FLORIDA POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28244439976     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.59.3.5     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Alexander, P., & Jetton, T. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285-310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Badders, W., Bethel, L., Fu, V., Peck, D., Sumners, C., & Valentino, C. (1999). Discovery works (Grs. 1-3). Parsippany, NJ: Silver Burdett Ginn.
4. Banks, J. Boehm, R., Colleary, K., Contreras, G., Goodwin, L., McFarland, M., et al., (2003). Social studies (Grs. 1-3). New York: Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
5. Bean, T. (2000). Reading in the content areas: Social constructivist dimensions. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 628-644). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Berson, M. (Ed.). (2003). Horizons (Grs. 1-3). Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
7. Block, C.C. (1993). Strategy instruction in a literature-based program. Elementary School Journal, 94, 139-151.
8. Block, C.C. (1999). Comprehension: Grafting understanding. In L. Gambrell, L. Morrow, S. Neuman, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 98-118). New York: Guilford.
9. Block, C.C., & Johnson, R. (2002). The thinking process approach to comprehension development: Preparing students for their future comprehension challenges. In C.C. Block, L. Gambrell, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice (pp. 54-79). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
10. Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18-37.
11. Dole, J., Brown, R., & Trathen, W. (1996). The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 62-88.
12. Duffy, G. (Ed.). (2003). Improving comprehension: 10 research-based principles. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
13. Durkin, D. (1978/1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-533.
14. Durkin, D. (1981). Reading comprehension instruction in five basal reader series. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 515-544.
15. Duthie, C. (1996). True stories: Nonfiction literacy in the primary classroom. New York: Stenhouse.
16. Guillaume, A. (1998). Learning with text in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 51, 476-485.
17. Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. York, ME: Stenhouse.
18. Howe, M., Grierson, S., & Richmond, M. (1997). A comparison of teachers' knowledge and use of content reading strategies in the primary grades. Reading Research and Instruction, 36, 305-324.
19. Keene, C., & Zimmerman, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
20. Miller, D. (2002). Reading with meaning: Teaching comprehension in the primary grades. York, ME: Stenhouse.
21. Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570.
22. Owocki, G. (2003). Comprehension: Strategic instruction for K-3 students. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
23. Pressley, M. (1999). Self-regulated comprehension processing and its development through instruction. In L. Gambrell, L. Morrow, S. Neuman, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 90-97). New York: Guilford.
24. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Readence, J., Bean, T., & Baldwin, R. (1998). Content area literacy: An integrated approach (6th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
27. Roehler, L., & Cantlon, D., (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 6-42). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
28. Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
29. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
30. Snow, C., Burns, M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31. Spor, M., & Schneider, B. (1999). Content reading strategies: What teachers know, use, and want to learn. Reading Research and Instruction, 28, 221-231.
32. Vacca, R., & Vacca, J. (1996). Content area reading (5th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
33. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1934)