Training for NOTES

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 343-360

  Levy, L Campbell ^a,b   Adrales, Gina ^a,b   Rothstein, Richard I ^a,b  

^a DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; COLONOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMENAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKILL; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRAINING;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; COLONOSCOPY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; ENDOSCOPES, GASTROINTESTINAL; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; GASTROENTEROLOGY; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY;

EID: 41149098146     PISSN: 10525157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2008.01.010     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery White Paper-October 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 199-203
2. Hawes R.H. Advanced endoscopy and endosurgical procedures: do we need a new subspecialty?. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 17 (2007) 635-639
3. Wigton R.S. Measuring procedural skills. Ann Intern Med 125 (1996) 1003-1004
4. Subspecialty policies for gastroenterology: eligibility for certification and board subspecialty policies. American Board of Internal Medicine. Available at: http://www.abim.org/cert/policies_ssgastro.shtm#contents. Accessed July 31, 2007.
5. Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. From the ASGE. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 49 (1999) 845-853
6. Cohen J., Cohen S.A., Vora K.C., et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 64 (2006) 361-368
7. Wigton R.S., Nicolas J.A., and Blank L.L. Procedural skills of the general internist. A survey of 2500 physicians. Ann Intern Med 111 (1989) 1023-1034
8. Wigton R.S., Blank L.L., Monsour H., et al. Procedural skills of practicing gastroenterologists. A national survey of 700 members of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 113 (1990) 540-546
9. Eisen G.M., Baron T.H., Dominitz J.A., et al. Methods of granting hospital privileges to perform gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 55 (2002) 780-783
10. Farthing M.J., Walt R.P., Allan R.N., et al. A national training programme for gastroenterology and hepatology. Gut 38 (1996) 459-470
11. Cass O.W., Freeman M.L., Peine C.J., et al. Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training. Ann Intern Med 118 (1993) 40-44
12. Cass O.W., Freeman M.L., Cohen J., et al. Acquisition of competency in endoscopic skills (ACES) during training: a multicenter study. [Abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 43 (1996) 308
13. Chak A., Cooper G.S., Blades E.W., et al. Prospective assessment of colonoscopic intubation skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 44 (1996) 54-57
14. Cass O.W. Training to competence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a plea for continuous measuring of objective end points. Endoscopy 31 (1999) 751-754
15. Lieberman D.A., Weiss D.G., Bond J.H., et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 343 (2000) 162-168
16. Aslinia F., Uradomo L., Steele A., et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 721-731
17. Wexner S.D., Forde K.A., Sellers G., et al. How well can surgeons perform colonoscopy?. Surg Endosc 12 (1998) 1410-1414
18. Sumiyama K., Gostout C.J., Rajan E., et al. Transesophageal mediastinoscopy by submucosal endoscopy with mucosal flap safety valve technique. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 679-683
19. Fritscher-Ravens A., Mosse C.A., Ikeda K., et al. Endoscopic transgastric lymphadenectomy by using EUS for selection and guidance. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 302-306
20. Fritscher-Ravens A., Ganbari A., Mosse C.A., et al. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided access to the heart. Endoscopy 39 (2007) 385-389
21. Rothstein R. Mediastinoscopy and pericardial window: a next NOTES frontier? Paper presented at: 2nd International Conference on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOSCAR), Boston, MA; July 13, 2007.
22. Willingham F.F., Gee D.W., Lauwers G.Y., et al. Natural orifice transesophageal mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy. Surg Endosc (2007) in press
23. Vignesh S., and Jamidar P. EUS-guided pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatobulbostomy in patients with pancreatic-duct obstruction inaccessible to transpapillary endoscopic therapy: working our way to NOTES. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 242-246
24. McGee M.F., Rosen M.J., Marks J., et al. A primer on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm. Surg Innov 13 (2006) 86-93
25. Azad J.S., Verma D., Kapadia A.S., et al. Can U.S. GI fellowship programs meet American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training in EUS? A survey of U.S. GI fellowship program directors. Gastrointest Endosc 64 (2006) 235-241
26. Eisen G.M., Dominitz J.A., Faigel D.O., et al. Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc 54 (2001) 811-814
27. Savides T.J., Fisher Jr. A.H., Gress F.G., et al. 1999 ASGE endoscopic ultrasound survey. ASGE Ad Hoc Endoscopic Ultrasound Committee. Gastrointest Endosc 52 (2000) 745-750
28. Meenan J., Anderson S., Tsang S., et al. Training in radial EUS: what is the best approach and is there a role for the nurse endoscopist?. Endoscopy 35 (2003) 1020-1023
29. Fockens P., Van den Brande J.H., van Dullemen H.M., et al. Endosonographic T-staging of esophageal carcinoma: a learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 44 (1996) 58-62
30. Chutkan R.K., Ahmad A.S., Cohen J., et al. ERCP core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 361-376
31. Freeman M.L., DiSario J.A., Nelson D.B., et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 54 (2001) 425-434
32. Choudari C.P., Sherman S., Fogel E.L., et al. Success of ERCP at a referral center after a previously unsuccessful attempt. Gastrointest Endosc 52 (2000) 478-483
33. Rollhauser C., Benjamin S.M., and Al-Kawas F. Success of ERCP at an academic center after referral for a failed cannulation or failure to complete therapeutic goal. [Abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 45 (1997) AB146
34. Williams E.J., Taylor S., Fairclough P., et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP: results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 39 (2007) 793-801
35. Varadarajulu S., Kilgore M.L., Wilcox C.M., et al. Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 64 (2006) 338-347
36. Jowell P.S., Baillie J., Branch M.S., et al. Quantitative assessment of procedural competence. A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Intern Med 125 (1996) 983-989
37. Williams E.J., Taylor S., Fairclough P., et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut 56 (2007) 821-829
38. Kowalski T., Kanchana T., and Pungpapong S. Perceptions of gastroenterology fellows regarding ERCP competency and training. Gastrointest Endosc 58 (2003) 345-349
39. Vitale G.C., Zavaleta C.M., Vitale D.S., et al. Training surgeons in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 20 (2006) 149-152
40. Garcia-Cano J. 200 supervised procedures: the minimum threshold number for competency in performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 21 (2007) 1254-1255
41. Escarce J.J., Bloom B.S., Hillman A.L., et al. Diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy among general surgeons in the United States. Med Care 33 (1995) 256-271
42. Flum D.R., Dellinger E.P., Cheadle A., et al. Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. J Am Med Assoc 289 (2003) 1639-1644
43. Flum D.R., Koepsell T., Heagerty P., et al. Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography: adverse outcome or preventable error?. Arch Surg 136 (2001) 1287-1292
44. Shea J.A., Healey M.J., Berlin J.A., et al. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 224 (1996) 609-620
45. Strasberg S.M., Hertl M., and Soper N.J. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180 (1995) 101-125
46. Deziel D.J., Millikan K.W., Economou S.G., et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77604 cases. Am J Surg 165 (1993) 9-14
47. Khan M.H., Howard T.J., Fogel E.L., et al. Frequency of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy detected by ERCP: experience at a large tertiary referral center. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 247-252
48. Figert P.L., Park A.E., Witzke D.B., et al. Transfer of training in acquiring laparoscopic skills. J Am Coll Surg 193 (2001) 533-537
49. Zerey M., Kercher K.W., Sing R.F., et al. Does a one-day course influence surgeon adoption of laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy?. J Surg Res 138 (2007) 205-208
50. Heniford B.T., Backus C.L., Matthews B.D., et al. Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic splenectomy. Am J Surg 181 (2001) 226-230
51. Heniford B.T., Matthews B.D., Box E.A., et al. Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy. Hernia 6 (2002) 17-20
52. Ritter E.M., Kindelan T.W., Michael C., et al. Concurrent validity of augmented reality metrics applied to the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS). Surg Endosc 21 (2007) 1441-1445
53. van Dongen K.W., Tournoij E., van der Zee D.C., et al. Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?. Surg Endosc 21 (2007) 1413-1417
54. Andreatta P.B., Woodrum D.T., Birkmeyer J.D., et al. Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 243 (2006) 854-860
55. Van Sickle K.R., McClusky III D.A., Gallagher A.G., et al. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc 19 (2005) 1227-1231
56. Korndorffer Jr. J.R., Dunne J.B., Sierra R., et al. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 201 (2005) 23-29
57. Adrales G.L., Park A.E., Chu U.B., et al. A valid method of laparoscopic simulation training and competence assessment. J Surg Res 114 (2003) 156-162
58. Mahmood T., and Darzi A. A study to validate the colonoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 17 (2003) 1583-1589
59. Mahmood T., and Darzi A. The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning. Surg Endosc 18 (2004) 1224-1230
60. Schauer P., Ikramuddin S., Hamad G., et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc 17 (2003) 212-215
61. Kothari S.N., Boyd W.C., Larson C.A., et al. Training of a minimally invasive bariatric surgeon: are laparoscopic fellowships the answer?. Obes Surg 15 (2005) 323-329
62. Birkmeyer J.D., Siewers A.E., Finlayson E.V., et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346 (2002) 1128-1137
63. Vosburgh K.G., and San Jose Estepar R. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): an opportunity for augmented reality guidance. Stud Health Technol Inform 125 (2007) 485-490