Comparison of descriptor spaces for chemical compound retrieval and classification

Knowledge and Information Systems

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 347-375

  Wale, Nikil ^a   Watson, Ian A ^b   Karypis, George ^a  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

^b ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Descriptor space; Kernel; Retreival; SVM

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); TOPOLOGY;

COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUE; DESCRIPTORS; KERNEL; KERNEL FUNCTION; MOLECULAR GRAPHS; POTENTIAL DRUG; RANKED RETRIEVAL; RETREIVAL;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 41149084603     PISSN: 02191377     EISSN: 02193116     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-007-0103-5     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. http://dtp.nci.nih.gov. The Aids Antiviral Screen
2. http://www.chemcomp.com. Chemical Computing Group
3. http://www.daylight.com. Daylight Inc
4. http://www.mdl.com. MDL Information Systems Inc
5. http://www.scitegic.com. Scitegic Inc
6. http://www.tripos.com. Tripos Inc
7. http://www.tripos.com. Tripos Inc
8. Mdl drug data report, version 2002.2. MDL Information Systems Inc. San Leandro, CA
9. http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. The PubChem Project
10. http://www.chemaxon.com. ChemAxon Inc
11. http://www.predictive-toxicology.org
12. Food and drug administration orange book, 22nd edn. U.S Food and Drug Administration, Washington DC (2003)
13. Ames BN, Durston WE, Yamasaki E and Lee FD (1973). Carcinogens are mutagens: A simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70:2281-2285
14. Barnard JM and Downs GM (1997). Chemical fragment generation and clustering software. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 37:141-142
15. Bland JM (1995). An introduction to medical statistics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
16. Brown R and Martin Y (1996). Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J Chem Inf Model 36(1):576-584
17. Deshpande M, Kuramochi M, Wale N and Karypis G (2005). Frequent substructure-based approaches for classifying chemical compounds. IEEE TKDE 17(8):1036-1050
18. Durant JL, Leland BA, Henry DR and Nourse JG (2002). Reoptimization of mdl keys for use in drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model 42(6):1273-1280
19. Gold LS and Zeiger E (1997). Handbook of carcinogenic potency and genotoxicity databases. CRC Press, BOCA Raton
20. Gribskov M and Robinson N (1996). Use of receiver operating characteristic (roc) analysis to evaluate matching. Comput Chem 20:25-33
21. Helma C, Cramer T, Kramer S and Raedt LD (2004). Data mining and machine learning techniques for the identification of mutagenicity inducing substructures and structure activity relationships of noncongeneric compounds. J Chem Inf Comp Sci 44(4):1402-1411
22. Hert J, Willet P, Wilton D, Acklin P, Azzaoui K, Jacoby E and Schuffenhauer A (2004). Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. Org Biomol Chem 2:3256-3266
23. Horvath T, Grtner T, Wrobel S (2004) Cyclic pattern kernels for predictive graph mining. SIGKDD. pp 158-167
24. Inokuchi A, Washio T, Motoda H (2000) An apriori-based algorithm for mining frequent substructures from graph data. PKDD. pp 13-23
25. Joachims T (1999). Advances in kernel methods: Support vector learning, making large-scale svm learning practical. MIT-Press, Cambridge
26. Kashima H, Tsuda K, Inokuchi A (2003) Marginalized kernels between labeled graphs. ICML
27. Kier L, Hall L (1999) Molecular structure description. ic Press
28. Kramer S, Raedt LD, Helma C (2001) Molecular feature mining in hiv data. SIGKDD
29. Kuramochi M and Karypis G (2004). An efficient algorithm for discovering frequent subgraphs. IEEE TKDE 16(9):1038-1051
30. Leach AR (2001). Molecular modeling: Principles and applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
31. Menchetti S, Costa F, Frasconi P (2005) Weighted decomposition kernels. ICML
32. Morgan HL (1965). The generation of unique machine description for chemical structures: A technique developed at chemical abstract services. J Chem Doc 5:107-1133
33. Nijssen S, Kok JN (2004) A quickstart in frequent structure mining can make a difference. SIGKDD
34. Richards GW (2002). Virtual screening using grid computing: The screensaver project. Nat Rev: Drug Discov 1:551-554
35. Rogers D, Brown R and Hahn M (2005). Using extended-connectivity fingerprints with laplacian-modified bayesian analysis in high-throughput screening. J Biomol Screen 10(7):682-686
36. Srinivasan A, King RD, Muggleton SH, Sternberg M (1997) The predictive toxicology evaluation challenge. IJCAI-97, pp 1-6
37. Swamidass SJ, Chen J, Bruand J, Phung P, Ralaivola L and Baldi P (2005). Kernels for small molecules and the prediction of mutagenicity, toxicity and anti-cancer activity. Bioinformatics 21(1):359-368
38. Vapnik V (1998). Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York
39. Vieth M, Siegel MG, Higgs RE, Watson IA, Robertson DH, Savin KA, Durst GL and Hipskind PA (2004). Characteristic physical properties and structural fragments of marketed oral drug. J Med Chem 47(1):224-232
40. Wale N, Karypis G (2006) Comparison of descriptor spaces for chemical compound retrieval and classification. International Conference in Datamining. (ICDM)
41. West DB (2001). Introduction to graph theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
42. Whittle M, Gillet VJ and Willett P (2004). Enhancing the effectiveness of virtual screening by fusing nearest neighbor list: A comparison of similarity coefficients. J Chem Inf Model 44:1840-1848
43. Willett P (1998). Chemical similarity searching. J Chem Inf Model 38(6):983-996
44. Wrlein M, Meinl T, Fischer I, Philippsen M (2005) A quantitative comparison of the subgraph miners mofa, gspan, ffsm, and gaston. PKDD
45. Yan X, Han J (2002) gspan: Graph-based substructure pattern mining. ICDM