The predictive toxicology evaluation challenge

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 1, Issue , 1997, Pages 4-9

  Srinivasan, A ^a   Muggleton, S H ^a   King, R D ^b,c   Sternberg, M J E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

^c ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIRABLE FEATURES; LARGE DATABASE; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY; SCIENTIFIC VALUES; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS; US NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAMS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84880685154     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. J. Ashby, R.W. Tennant, E. Zeiger, and S. Stasiewicz. Classification according to chemical structure, mutagenicity to salmonella and level of carcinogenicity of a further 42 chemicals tested for carcinogenicity by the U.S. National Toxicology Program. Mutation Research, 223:73-103, 1989. (Pubitemid 19140385)
2. D. Bahler and D. Bristol. The induction of rules for predicting chemical carcinogenesis. In Proceedings of the 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, 1993. IEEE Computer Society Press.
3. G. Bakale and R.D. McCreary. Prospective ke screening of potential carcinogens being tested in rodent bioassays by the US National Toxicology Program. Mutagenesis, 7:91-94, 1992.
4. R. Benigni. Predicting chemical carcinogenesis in rodents: the state of the art in the light of a comparative exercise. Mutation Research, 334:103-113, 1995.
5. M. Bland. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989.
6. D.W. Bristol, J.T. Wachsman, and A. Greenwell. The NIEHS Predictive-Toxicology Evaluation Project. Environmental Health Perspectives, pages 1001-1010, 1996. Supplement 3.
7. K. Enslein, B.W. Blake, and H.H. Borgstedt. Predicition of probability of carcinogenecity for a set of ntp bioassays. Mutagenesis, 5:305-306, 1990. (Pubitemid 20334841)
8. E.A. Feigenbaum, B.C. Buchanan, and J. Lederberg. On generality and problem solving: a case study using the DENDRAL program. In D. Michie, editor, Machine Intelligence 6. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1971.
9. J. Huff and J. Haseman. Long-term chemical carcinogenesis experiments for identifying potential human cancer hazards. Environmental Health Perspectives, 96(3):23-31, 1991.
10. T.D. Jones and C.E. Easterly. On the rodent bioassays currently being conducted on 44 chemicals: a RASH analysis to predict test results from the National Toxicology Program. Mutagenesis, 6:507-514, 1991.
11. R.D. King and A. Srinivasan. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays from molecular structure using inductive logic programming. Environmental Health Perspectives, 104(5):1031-1040, 1996. (Pubitemid 26402347)
12. R.D. King, S.H. Muggleton, and M.J.E. Sternberg. Drug design by machine learning: The use of inductive logic programming to model the structure-activity relationships of trimethoprim analogues binding to dihydrofolate reductase. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 89(23):11322-11326, 1992.
13. R.D. King, S.H. Muggleton, A. Srinivasan, and M.J.E. Sternberg. Structure-activity relationships derived by machine learning: The use of atoms and their bond connectivities to predict mutagenicity by inductive logic programming. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 93:438-442, 1996. (Pubitemid 26038172)
14. P. Langley, G.L Bradshaw, and H. Simon. Rediscovering chemistry with the Bacon system. In R. Michalski, J. Carbonnel, and T. Mitchell, editors, Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, pages 307-330. Tioga, Palo Alto, CA, 1983.
15. D.F.V. Lewis, C. Ionnides, and D.V. Parke. A prospective toxicity evaluation (COMPACT) on 40 chemicals currently being tested by the National Toxicology Program. Mutagenesis, 5:433-436, 1990.
16. S.H. Muggleton and C. Feng. Efficient induction of logic programs. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory, Tokyo, 1990. Ohmsha.
17. S. Muggleton, R. King, and M. Sternberg. Predicting protein secondary structure using inductive logic programming. Protein Engineering, 5:647-657, 1992.
18. S.H. Muggleton, A. Srinivasan, R.D. King, and M.J.E. Sternberg. Biochemical knowledge discovery using Inductive Logic Programming. In R. Michalski, M. Kubat, and I. Bratko, editors, Methods and Applications of Machine Learning, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. John Wiley, 1996.
19. S. Muggleton. Inverse Entailment and Progol. New Gen. Comput, 13:245-286, 1995.
20. H.S. Rosenkranz and G. Klopman. Predicition of the carcinogenecity in rodents of chemicals currently being tested by the US National Toxicology Program. Mutagenesis, 5:425-432, 1990. (Pubitemid 20336898)
21. D.M. Sanderson and C.G. Earnshaw. Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure. Human Exp Toxicol, 10:261-273, 1991.
22. A. Srinivasan, S.H. Muggleton, R.D. King, and M.J.E. Sternberg. Theories for mutagenicity: a study of first-order and feature based induction. Artificial Intelligence, 85:277-299, 1996. (Pubitemid 126363732)
23. R.W. Tennant, J. Spalding, S. Stasiewicz, and J. Ashby. Prediction of the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays currently being conducted on 44 chemicals by the National Toxicology Program. Mutagenesis, 5:3-14, 1990. (Pubitemid 20102062)