Arterial pressure and stroke volume variability as measurements for cardiovascular optimisation

International Journal of Intensive Care

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 67-72

  Parry Jones, A J D ^a   Pittman, James A L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL DEVON AND EXETER NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BREATHING; BREATHING PATTERN; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PULSE PRESSURE; PULSE WAVE; REVIEW;

EID: 2342423983     PISSN: 13502794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Perel A. Assessing fluid responsiveness by the systolic pressure variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. [Letter; comment.] Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1309-1310.
2. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-138.
3. Van Lieshout JJ, Weisseling KH. Continuous cardiac output by pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 467-469.
4. Buhre W, Weyland A, Kazmaier S et al. Comparison of cardiac output assessed by pulse-contour analysis and thermodilution in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 13: 437-440.
5. Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M et al. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2407-2412.
6. Zollner C, Haller M, Weis M et al. Beat-to-beat measurement of cardiac output by intravascular pulse contour analysis: a prospective criterion standard study in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000; 14: 125-129.
7. Pizov R, Segal E, Kaplan L, Floman Y, Perel A. The use of systolic pressure variation in hemodynamic monitoring during deliberate hypotension in spine surgery. J Clin Anesth 1990; 2: 96-100.
8. Rooke GA. Systolic pressure variation as an indicator of hypovolaemia. Current Opin Anaesthesiol 1995; 8: 511-515.
9. Szold A, Pizov R, Segal E, Perel A. The effect of tidal volume and intravascular volume state on systolic pressure variation in ventilated dogs. Intensive Care Med 1989; 15: 368-371.
10. Perel A. Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolaemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded haemorrhage. Anesthesiology 2003; 67: 498-502.
11. Rooke GA, Schwid HA, Shapira Y. The effect of graded hemorrhage and intravascular volume replacement on systolic pressure variation in humans during mechanical and spontaneous ventilation. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 925-932.
12. Weiss YG, Oppenheim-Eden A, Gilon D, Sprung CL, Muggia-Sullam M, Pizov R. Systolic pressure variation in hemodynamic monitoring after severe blast injury. J Clin Anesth 1999; 11: 132-135.
13. Perel A, Pizov R. Cardiovascular effects of mechanical ventilation. In: Perel A, Stock MC, (eds.), Handbook of Mechanical Ventilatory Support. Baltimore, USA: Williams & Wilkins, 1992.
14. Coriat P, Vrillon M, Perel A et al. A comparison of systolic blood pressure variations and echocardiographic estimates of end-diastolic left ventricular size in patients after aortic surgery. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 46-53.
15. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313-1321.
16. Eisner MD, Thompson T, Hudson LD et al. Efficacy of low tidal volume ventilation in patients with different clinical risk factors for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 231-236.
17. Messinger G, Segal E, Peral A. Monitoring of hypovolaemia. Current Opin Anaesthesiol 1993; 6: 393-399.
18. Ornstein E, Eidelman LA, Drenger B, Elami A, Pizov R. Systolic pressure variation predicts the response to acute blood loss. J Clin Anesth 1998; 10: 137-140.
19. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 984-989.
20. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000-2008.
21. Pizov R, Cohen M, Weiss Y, Segal E, Cotev S, Perel A. Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced hemodynamic changes are reflected in the arterial pressure waveform. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 1381-1387.
22. Garcia-Rodriguez C, Pittman J, Cassell CH et al. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: a clinical assessment of central venous and peripheral venous injection. Crit Care Med 2003; 30: 2199-2204.
23. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1368-1377.