Intertrial inhibition of focused attention in pop-out search

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 114-131

  Lleras, Alejandro ^a   Kawahara, Jun Ichiro ^b   Wan, Xiaoang Irene ^a   Ariga, Atsunori ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; VISION;

ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PERCEPTUAL MASKING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 40949158811     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.1.114     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. ARIGA, A., & KAWAHARA, J. (2004). The perceptual and cognitive distractor-previewing effect. Journal of Vision, 4, 891-903.
2. ARIGA, A., LLERAS, A., & KAWAHARA, J. (2004). Task relevance and response suppression in the distractor previewing effect [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4, 687a.
3. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
4. BRAVO, M. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 465-472.
5. BREITMEYER, B. G., OGMEN, H., & CHEN, J. (2004). Unconscious priming by color and form: Different processes and levels. Consciousness &. Cognition, 13, 138-157.
6. BREITMEYER, B. G., RO, T., & SINGHAL, N. S. (2004). Unconscious color priming occurs at stimulus- not percept-dependent levels of processing. Psychological Science, 15, 198-202.
7. CHU, H., LEVINTHAL, B., & LLERAS, A. (2007, May). What is being marked in visual marking? Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
8. DEHAENE, S., NACCACHE, L., COHEN, L., LE BIHAN, D., MANGIN, J.-F., POLINE, J.-B., & RIVIÈRE, D. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 752-758.
9. DONK, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 891-900.
10. DONK, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1231-1242.
11. DOWNING, P. E. (2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11, 467-473.
12. EIMER, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 225-234.
13. FECTEAU, J. H. (2007). Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers. Journal of Vision, 7, 1-11.
14. FECTEAU, J. H., & MUNOZ, D. P. (2003). Exploring the consequences of the previous trial. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 435-443.
15. FECTEAU, J. H., & MUNOZ, D. P. (2006). Salience, relevance, and firing: A priority map for target selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 382-390.
16. FOLK, C. L., LEBER, A. B., & EGETH, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 741-753.
17. GOOLSBY, B. A., GRABOWECKY, M., & SUZUKI, S. (2005). Adaptive modulation of color salience contingent upon global form coding and task relevance. Vision Research, 45, 901-930.
18. GOOLSBY, B. A., & SUZUKI, S. (2001a, November). Color priming and adaptation in color-singleton search. Paper presented at the annual Object Perception, Attention, and Memory conference, Orlando, FL.
19. GOOLSBY, B. A., & SUZUKI, S. (2001b). Understanding priming of colorsingleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and "retrieval." Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 929-944.
20. GRATTON, G., COLES, M. G. H., SIREVAAG, E. J., ERIKSEN, C. W., & DONCHIN, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 331-344.
21. ITTI, L., & KOCH, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489-1506.
22. KLEIN, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-146.
23. KLEIN, R. M., & MACINNES, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
24. LABERGE, D., & BROWN, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
25. LOWE, D. G. (1979). Strategies, context, and the mechanism of response inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 382-389.
26. LU, J., & ITTI, L. (2005). Perceptual consequences of feature-based attention. Journal of Vision, 5, 622-631.
27. LUCK, S. J., & HILLYARD, S. A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1000-1014.
28. MACINNES, W. J., & KLEIN, R. M. (2003). Inhibition of return biases orienting during the search of complex scenes. Scientific World Journal, 3, 75-86.
29. MALIKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
30. MAUKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 977-991.
31. MALJKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2000). Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7, 571-595.
32. MCCARLEY, J. S., WANG, R. F., KRAMER, A. F., IRWIN, D. E., & PETERSON, M. S. (2003). How much memory does oculomotor search have? Psychological Science, 14, 422-426.
33. MILLIKEN, B., JOORDENS, S., MERIKLE, P. M., & SEIFFERT, A. E. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203-229.
34. MOORE, C. M. (1994). Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone? Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 133-147.
35. NAVALPAKKAM, V., & ITTI, L. (2007). Search goal tunes visual features optimally. Neuron, 53, 605-617.
36. PELLI, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
37. PETERSON, M. S., KRAMER, A. F., WANG, R. F., IRWIN, D. E., & MCCARLEY, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12, 287-292.
38. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. A. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-554). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. ROVAMO, J., & VIRSU, V. (1979). Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research, 37, 475-494.
40. SAENZ, M., BURACAS, G. T., & BOYNTON, G. M. (2003). Global feature-based attention for motion and color. Vision Research, 43, 629-637.
41. SHIN, E., WAN, X. I., FABIANI, M., GRATTON, G., & LLERAS, A. (in press). Electrophysiological evidence of feature-based inhibition of focused attention across consecutive trials. Psychophysiology.
42. THOMAS, L. E., AMBINDER, M. S., HSIEH, B., LEVINTHAL, B., CROWELL, J. A., IRWIN, D. E., ET AL. (2006). Fruitful visual search: Inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 891-895.
43. TIPPER, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
44. TIPPER, S. P., & CRANSTON, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 591-611.
45. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
46. TREISMAN, A. [M.], & SOUTHER, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285-310.
47. WAN, X. I., & LLERAS, A. (2007). The effect of feature discriminability on the inter-trial inhibition of focused attention. Manuscript submitted for publication.
48. WATANABE, T., HARNER, A. M., MIYAUCHI, S., SASAKI, Y., NIELSEN, M., PALOMO, D., & MUKAI, I. (1998). Task-dependent influences of attention on the activation of human primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 11489-11492.
49. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attention inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
50. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
51. WOLFE, J. M., CAVE, K. R., & FRANZEL, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-433.
52. WOODMAN, G. F., & LUCK, S. J. (1999). Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature, 400, 867-869.