Gamma knife surgery for arteriovenous malformations in the brain: Integration of time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography into dosimetry planning - Technical note

Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 107, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 854-859

  Taschner, Christian A ^a   Le Thuc, Vianney ^a   Reyns, Nicolas ^a   Gieseke, Juergen ^b   Gauvrit, Jean Yves ^a   Pruvo, Jean Pierre ^a   Leclerc, Xavier ^a  

^a LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Arteriovenous malformation; Gamma Knife surgery; Magnetic resonance angiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DOSIMETRY; FEMALE; GAMMA KNIFE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

EID: 35148883787     PISSN: 00223085     EISSN: 00223085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/JNS-07/10/0854     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, Nanbu A, Kumagai H, Nichiyama Y, et al: MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:451-453, 2000
2. Aoyama H, Shirato H, Katoh N, Kudo K, Asano T, Kuroda S, et al: Comparison of imaging modalities for the accurate delineation of arteriovenous malformation, with reference to stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:1232-1238, 2005
3. Bednarz G, Downes B, Werner-Wasik M, Rosenwasser RH: Combining stereotactic angiography and 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in treatment planning for arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46:1149-1154, 2000
4. Berteloot D, Leclerc X, Leys D, Krivosic R, Pruvo JP: [Cerebral angiography: a study of complications in 450 consecutive procedures.] J Radiol 80:843-848, 1999 (Fr)
5. Brown RD Jr, Wiebers DO, Forbes GS: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations: frequency of intracranial hemorrhage and relationship of lesions. J Neurosurg 73:859-863, 1990
6. Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE: Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke 30:317-320, 1999
7. Derdeyn CP, Moran CJ, Eichling JO, Cross DT III: Radiation dose to patients and personnel during intraoperative digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:300-305, 1999
8. Farb RI, McGregor C, Kim JK, Laliberte M, Derbyshire JA, Willinsky RA, et al: Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography - initial assessment. Radiology 220:244-251, 2001
9. Fleetwood IG, Steinberg GK: Arteriovenous malformations. Lancet 359:863-873, 2002
10. Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Oppenheim C, Munier T, Trystram D, Rachdi H, et al: Three-dimensional dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using sensitivity encoding for the evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1525-1531, 2005
11. Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, Wilkinson ID, Anderson B, Romanowski CA: Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1892-1899, 2000
12. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, Flom RA, Bird CR, Drayer BP, et al: Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:1401-1411, 1994
13. Meckel S, Mekle R, Taschner CA, Haller S, Scheffler K, Radue EW, et al: Time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with GRAPPA on a 1.5-t system for imaging of craniocervical vascular disease: initial experience. Neuroradiology 48:291-299, 2006
14. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P: SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952-962, 1999
15. Redekop G, TerBrugge K, Montanera W, Willinsky R: Arterial aneurysms associated with cerebral arteriovenous malformations: classification, incidence, and risk of hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 89:539-546, 1998
16. Rohlfing T, West JB, Beier J, Liebig T, Taschner CA, Thomale UW: Registration of functional and anatomical MRI: accuracy assessment and application in navigated neurosurgery. Comput Aided Surg 5:414-425, 2000
17. Soderman M, Andersson T, Karlsson B, Wallace MC, Edner G: Management of patients with brain arteriovenous malformations. Eur J Radiol 46:195-205, 2003
18. Summers PE, Kollias SS, Valavanis A: Resolution improvement in thick-slab magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography using SENSE at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:662-673, 2004
19. Tsuchiya K, Aoki C, Fujikawa A, Hachiya J: Three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography using parallel imaging and keyhole data sampling in cerebrovascular diseases: initial experience. Eur Radiol 14:1494-1497, 2004
20. Turjman F, Massoud TF, Viñuela F, Sayre J, Guglielmi G, Duckwiler G: Correlation of the angioarchitectural features of cerebral arteriovenous malformations with clinical presentation of hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 37:856-862, 1995
21. Wang Y, Johnston DL, Breen JF, Huston J III, Jack CR, Julsrud PR, et al: Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction. Magn Reson Med 36:551-556, 1996
22. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A, Roditi G, Lawton T, Reid A, et al: Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:671-677, 2000
23. Wetzel SG, Bilecen D, Lyrer P, Bongartz G, Seifritz E, Radue EW, et al: Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: detection by dynamic MR projection angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1293-1295, 2000
24. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R, Strunk H, Hoogeveen R, von Falkenhausen M, et al: Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial- resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology 225:583-588, 2002