Prime-trial processing demands and their impact on distractor processing in a spatial negative priming task

Psychological Research

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 235-248

  Buckolz, Eric ^a   Avramidis, Chris ^a   Fitzgeorge, Lyndsay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE;

ADULT; AFFECT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 40949123878     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-007-0107-5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baylis, G. C., Tipper, S. P., & Houghton, G. (1997). Externally cued and internally generated selection: Differences in distractor analysis and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1617-1630.
2. Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., & Khan, M. (2002). The influence of probe-trial selection requirements on the location negative priming effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 274-283.
3. Buckolz, E., Goldfarb, A., & Khan, M. (2004). The use of a distractor-assigned response slows later responding in a location negative priming task. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 837-845.
4. Buckolz, E., Guy, S., Khan, M., & Lawrence, G. (2006). Can the location negative priming process operate in a proactive manner? Psychological Research, 70, 218-227.
5. Christie, J., & Klein, R. (2001). Negative priming for spatial location? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 24-38.
6. Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Budayr, B. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 1211-1214.
7. De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
8. Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293-313.
9. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
10. Eimer, M., Schubo, A., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Locus of inhibition in the masked priming of response alternatives. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 3-10.
11. Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., & O'Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23, 165-168.
12. Fitzgeorge, L., & Buckolz, E. (2006). Spatial negative priming modulation: The influence of probe-trial target cueing, distractor presence and an intervening response (under review).
13. Fitzgeorge, L., Guy, S., & Buckolz, E. (2006). Disengaging the location negative priming (NP) effect: The influence of an intervening response. In Paper presented at a meeting of the Canadian Society for Psychomotor Learning and Sport Psychology, Halifax (Oct. 31-Nov. 4).
14. Grison, S., Tipper, S. P., & Hewitt, O. (2005). Long-term negative priming: support for retrieval of prior attentional processes. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 58, 1199-1224.
15. Guy, S., & Buckolz, E. (2006). The locus and modulation of the location negative priming effect. Psychological Research (DOI 10.1007/s00426-005-0003-9).
16. Guy, S., Buckolz, E., & Fitzgeorge, L. (2007). Disengaging the location negative priming effect: The influence of an intervening response. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology (in press).
17. Guy, S., Buckolz, E., & Khan, M. (2006). The locus of location repetition latency effects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 307-318.
18. Guy, S., Buckolz, E., & Pratt, J. (2004). The influence of distractor-only prime trials on the location negative priming mechanism. Experimental Psychology, 51, 4-14.
19. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). Orlando: Academic Press.
20. Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming: Reply to Klapp (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 436-440.
21. Lupianez, J., Decaix, C., Sieroff, E., Chokron, S., Milliken, B., & Bartolomeo, P. (2004). Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations. Experimental Brain Research, 159, 447-457.
22. Lupianez, J., Klein, R., & Bartolomeo, P. (2006). Inhibition of return: Twenty years after. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1003-1014.
23. Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupianez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1289-1296.
24. Morgan, H. M., Paul, M. A., & Tipper, S. P. (2005). Inhibition of return can be associated with object identity but not with object category. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 499-520.
25. Neill, W. T., Terry, K. M., & Valdes, L. A. (1994). Negative priming without probe selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 119-121.
26. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2000). A central-peripheral asymmetry in subliminal priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1367-1382.
28. Tipper, S.W. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321-343.
29. Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492-504.
30. Tipper, S. P., Meegan, D., & Houghton, L. A. (2002). Action-centered negative priming: Evidence for reactive inhibition. Visual Cognition, 9, 591-614.
31. Tipper, S.P., Weaver, B., Cameron, S., Brehaut, J., & Bastedo, J. (1991). Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: Time course and disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 681-692.
32. Valle-Inclan, F., & Redondo, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology, 35, 366-371.