The use of a distractor-assigned response slows later responding in a location negative priming task

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 837-845

  Buckolz, Eric ^a   Goldfarb, Adam ^a   Khan, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7944223105     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194977     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BAYLIS, G. C., TIPPER, S. P., & HOUGHTON, G. (1997). Externally cued and internally generated selection: Differences in distractor analysis and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1617-1630.
2. BUCKOLZ, E., BOULOUGOURIS, A., & KHAN, M. (2002). The influence of probe-trial selection requirements on the location negative priming effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 274-283.
3. BUCKOLZ, E., BOULOUGOURIS, A., O'DONNELL, C., & PRATT, J. (2002). Disengaging the negative priming mechanism in location tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 207-225.
4. BUCKOLZ, E., VAN DAMME, J., & O'DONNELL, C. (1998). Positive priming: Locations containing relevant information are labeled accordingly. Human Movement Science, 17, 781-799.
5. CHRISTIE, J., & KLEIN, R. (2001). Negative priming for spatial location? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 24-38.
6. COLE, M. G. H., GRATTON, G., BASHORE, T. R., ERIKSEN, C. W., & DONCHIN, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 529-553.
7. DE JONO, R., LIANG, C.-C., & LAUBER, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 731-750.
8. DEUTSCH, J. A., DEUTSCH, D., LINDSAY, P. H., & TREISMAN, A. M. (1967). Comments on selective attention: Perception or response. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 362-367.
9. EIMER, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioral performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293-313.
10. EIMER, M., SCHUBO, A., & SCHLAGHECKEN, F. (2002). Locus of inhibition in the masked priming of response alternatives. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 3-10.
11. ERIKSEN, C. W., COLES, M. G. H., MORRIS, L. R., & O'HARA, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psyckonomic Society, 23, 165-168.
12. FRAME, K., CHRISTIE, J., & KLEIN, R. (1993, November). Negative priming for spatial location: A methodological critique. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
13. GUY, S., & BUCKOLZ, E. (2003, October). The locus of location repetition latency effects. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society for Psychology of Sport and Psychomotor Learning, Hamilton, ON.
14. GUY, S., BUCKOLZ, E., & PRATT, J. (2004). The influence of distractor-only prime trials on the location negative priming mechanism. Experimental Psychology, 54, 4-14.
15. HOUGHTON, G., & TIPPER, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
16. KLEIN, R. M., & TAYLOR, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). San Diego: Academic Press.
17. MILLIKEN, B., JOORDENS, S., MERIKLE, P., & SEIFFERT, A. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203-229.
18. MILLIKEN, B., TIPPER, S. P., HOUGHTON, G., & LUPIÁÑEZ, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1280-1296.
19. MOORE, C. M. (1994). Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone? Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 133-147.
20. NEILL, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1291-1305.
21. NEILL, W. T., TERRY, K. M., & VALDES, L. A. (1994). Negative priming without probe selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 119-121.
22. NEILL, W. T., VALDES, L. A., & TERRY, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. M. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207-261). New York: Academic Press.
23. SMID, H., MULDER, G., & MULDER, L. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychologica, 74, 169-201.
24. TIPPER, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
25. TIPPER, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321-343.
26. TIPPER, S. P., BREHAUT, J. C., & DRIVER, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 492-504.
27. TIPPER, S. P., & CRANSTON, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignore primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37 A, 581-611.
28. TIPPER, S. P., MEEGAN, D., & HOWARD, L. A. (2002). Action-centered negative-priming: Evidence for reactive inhibition. Visual Cognition, 9, 591-614.
29. VALLE-INCLÁN, F., & REDONDO, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ip-silateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology, 35, 366-371.