The locus and modulation of the location negative priming effect

Psychological Research

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 178-191

  Guy, Sarah ^a   Buckolz, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

CONDITIONING, OPERANT; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33846978454     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0003-9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baylis, G. C., Tipper. S. P., & Houghton, G. (1997). Externally cued and internally generated selection: Differences in distractor analysis and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1617-1630.
2. Buckolz, E., & Rugins, O. (1981). Evidence of response bias facilitation on choice reaction time within a many:1 stimulus-response paradigm. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 5, 97-104.
3. Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., & Khan, M. (2002a). The influence of probe-trial selection requirements on the location negative priming effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 274-283.
4. Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., O'Donnell, C., & Pratt, J. (2002b). Disengaging the negative priming mechanism in location tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 207-225.
5. Buckolz, E., Goldfarb, A., & Khan, M. (2004). The use of a distractor-assigned response slows later responding in a location negative priming task. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 837-845.
6. Buckolz, E., Guy, S., Khan, M., & Lawrence, G. (2005). Can the location negative priming process operate in a proactive manner. Psychological Research (on line).
7. Christie, J., & Klein, R. (2001). Negative priming for spatial location? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 24-38.
8. De Jong, R., Liang, C-C., & Lauber, E. (1994) Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
9. Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.
10. Eimer, M., Schubo, A., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Locus of inhibition in the masked priming of response alternatives. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 3-10.
11. Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., & O'Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165-168.
12. Fitts, P., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). SR compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
13. Geller, E. S. (1974). Preceding prediction outcome and prediction outcome probability: interacting determinants of choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 426-430.
14. Geller, E. S. (1975). Prediction outcome and choice reaction time: inhibition versus facilitation effects. Acta Psychologica, 39, 69-82.
15. Grison, S., Tipper, S. P., & Hewitt, O. (2005). Long-term negative priming: support for a retrieval of prior attentional processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, (in press).
16. Guy, S., & Buckolz, E. (2004). Cueing the response in a location negative priming task: Locus implications. Presented to the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. (June)
17. Guy, S., Buckolz, E., & Pratt, J. (2004). The influence of distractor-only prime trials on the location negative priming mechanism. Experimental Psychology, 51, 1-11.
18. Guy, S., Buckolz, E. & Khan, M. (2005). The locus of location repetition latency effects. Manuscript under review.
19. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory, and language (ed. D. Dagenbach & T. Carr), pp. 53-112. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20. Keele, S. (1969). Repetition effect: A memory dependent process. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 243-248.
21. Keele, S. W. (1973). Attention and human performance. Pacific Palisades, California: Goodyear.
22. Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupianez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1289-1296.
23. Neill, W. T., Terry, K. M., & Valdes, L. A. (1994). Negative priming without probe selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 119-121.
24. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In Frank M. Dempster & Charles J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and Inhibition in Cognition. Academic Press: New York (pp. 207-261).
25. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(A), 571-590.
26. Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54 A, 321-343.
27. Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignore primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37 A, 581-611.
28. Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492-504.
29. Tipper, S. W., Weaver, B., Cameron, S., Brehaut, J., & Bastedo, J. (1991). Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: Time course and disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 681-692.
30. Valle-Inclan, F., & Redondo, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology, 35, 366-371.
31. Whitman, C. P. & Geller, E. S. (1974). Prediction outcome probabilities as determinants of choice reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 105-109.