Inhibition of return can be associated with object identity but not with object category

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 499-520

  Morgan, Helen M ^a   Paul, Matthew A ^a   Tipper, Steven P ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; EXPERIMENTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RESPONSE TIME;

EID: 23244460396     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440440000186     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(3), 467-477.
2. Becker, L., & Egeth, H. (2000). Mixed reference frames for dynamic inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 1167-1177.
3. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
4. Chasteen, A. L., & Pratt, J. (1999). The effect of inhibition of return on lexical access. Psychological Science, 10(1), 41-46.
5. Curran, T., Tanaka, J. W., & Weiskopf, D. M. (2002). An electrophysiological comparison of visual categorization and recognition memory. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(1), 1-18.
6. DeSchepper, B., & Treisman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 27-47.
7. Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto, M., & Freeman, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition, 80(1-2), 61-95.
8. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(4), 501-517.
9. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 161-177.
10. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149.
11. Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psycho-nomic Bulletin and Review, 2(2), 145-173.
12. Fuentes, L. J., Vivas, A. B., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999a). Inhibitory mechanisms of attentional networks: Spatial and semantic inhibitory processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1114-1126.
13. Fuentes, L. J., Vivas, A. B., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999b). Inhibitory tagging of stimulus properties in inhibition of return: Effects on semantic priming and flanker interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A(1), 149-164.
14. Gerlach, C., Law, I., Gade, A., & Paulson, O. B. (2000). Categorization and category effects in normal object recognition: A PET study. Neuropsychologia, 38(13), 1693-1703.
15. Gibson, B. S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception and Psychophysics, 55(3), 323-339.
16. Grison, S., Kessler, K., Paul, M., Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (2004). Object- and location-based inhibition in goal-directed action: Inhibition of return reveals behavioural and anatomical dissociations and interactions with memory processes. In G. W. Humphreys & J. Riddoch (Eds.), Attention in action: Advances from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 171-208). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
17. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
18. Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (2000). Spatial memory averaging, the landmark attraction effect, and representational gravity. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 64(1), 41-55.
19. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98(3), 352-376.
20. Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (1998). Object-based inhibition of return in static displays. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5(3), 504-509.
21. Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Spread of inhibition across an object's surface. British Journal of Psychology, 90(4), 495-507.
22. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
23. Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10(4), 346-352.
24. Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1993). The learning of categories: Parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. Science, 262(5140), 1747-1749.
25. Kolodny, J. A. (1994). Memory processes in classification learning: An investigation of amnesic performance in categorization of dot patterns and artistic styles. Psychological Science, 5(3), 164-169.
26. Leek, E. C., Reppa, I., & Tipper, S. P. (2003). Inhibition of return for objects and locations in static displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(3), 388-395.
27. Lupianez, J., Milan, E. G., Tornay, F. J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception and Psychophysics, 59(8), 1241-1254.
28. Mari-Beffa, P., Fuentes, L. J., Catena, A., & Houghton, G. (2000). Semantic priming in the prime task effect: Evidence of automatic semantic processing of distractors. Memory and Cognition, 25(4), 635-647.
29. May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 35-54.
30. McAuliffe, J., Pratt, J., & O'Donnell, C. (2001). Examining location-based and object-based components of inhibition in static displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 63(6), 1072-1082.
31. McCrae, C. S., & Abrams, R. A. (2001). Age-related differences in object- and location-based inhibition of return of attention. Psychology and Aging, 16(3), 437-449.
32. Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupianez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(6), 1280-1296.
33. Mueller, H. J., & von Muehlenen, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(5), 1591-1605.
34. Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Expertmental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(3), 444-450.
35. Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(3), 565-576.
36. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainard (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207-261). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
37. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 993-1000.
38. Paul, M. A., & Tipper, S. P. (2003). Object-based representations facilitate memory for inhibitory processes. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 283-289.
39. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
40. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
41. Reed, J. M., Squire, L. R., Patalano, A. L., Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1999). Learning about categories that are defined by object-like stimuli despite impaired declarative memory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113(3), 411-419.
42. Reppa, I., & Leek, E. C. (2003). The modulation of inhibition of return by object-internal structure: Implications for theories of object-based attentional selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(2), 493-502.
43. Ro, T., & Rafal, R. D. (1999). Components of reflexive visual orienting to moving objects. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(5), 826-836.
44. Robertson, L. C. (2004). Space, objects, minds, and brains. New York: Psychological Press.
45. Squire, L. R., & Knowlton, B. J. (1995). Memory, hippocampus, and brain systems. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 825-837). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
47. Takeda, Y., & Yagi, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(5), 927-934.
48. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 37A(4), 571-590.
49. Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A(2), 321-343.
50. Tipper, S. P., & Driver, J. (1988). Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli. Memory and Cognition, 16(1), 64-70.
51. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A(2), 289-298.
52. Tipper, S. P., Grison, S., & Kessler, K. (2003). Long-term inhibition of return of attention. Psychological Science, 14(1), 19-25.
53. Tipper, S. P., & Weaver, B. (1998). The medium of attention: Location-based, object-centered, or scene-based? In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Vancouver studies in cognitive science: Vol. 8. Visual attention (pp. 77-107). New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L., & Burak, A. (1994). Object and environment based inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 478-499.
55. Vivas, A. B., & Fuentes, L. J. (2001). Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8(2), 315-323.
56. Weaver, B., Lupianez, J., & Watson, F. L. (1998). The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 60(6), 993-1003.