Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 9, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Decking, Ralf ^a   Rokahr, Christoph ^b   Zurstegge, Matthias ^b,c   Simon, Ulrich ^b   Decking, Jens ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b ST FRANZISKUS HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^c Asklepios Stadtklinik ^*  (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MAINZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMORAL NECK HIP PROSTHESIS; FEMUR NECK; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; WOMAC INDEX; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 40849100229     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-17     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Mechanisms of bone loss associated with total hip replacement. JJ Jacobs DR Sumner JO Galante, Orthop Clin North Am 1993 24 583 590 8414423
2. Peri-prosthetic bone density after implantation of a custom-made femoral component. A five-year follow-up. UG Leichtle CI Leichtle B Schmidt F Martini, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006 88 467 471 10.1302/0301-620X.88B4.16613 16567780
3. Periprosthetic bone remodelling after cementless total hip replacement. A prospective comparison of two different implant designs. KC Ang S Das De JC Goh SL Low K Bose, J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997 79 675 679 10.1302/0301-620X.79B4.7410 9250764
4. Annual Report 2005. J Karrholm G Garellick P Herberts, Göteborg, Sweden, Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Register SNHA, 2005 1 86
5. Current trends in total hip arthroplasty. C Eingartner, Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2007 9 8 14 17514169
6. [Influence on load transfer of different femoral neck endoprostheses]. E Steinhauser M Ellenrieder G Gruber R Busch R Gradinger W Mittelmeier, Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2006 144 386 393 10.1055/s-2006-942127 16941296
7. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. R Decking W Puhl U Simon LE Claes, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006 21 495 501 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.011 16457913
8. Fixation and effect on bone strain pattern of a stemless hip prosthesis. E Munting M Verhelpen, J Biomech 1995 28 949 961 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00146-U 7673262
9. Outcome of total hip replacement: a comparison of different measurement methods. P Soderman H Malchau P Herberts, Clin Orthop 2001 163 172 11550862
10. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. WH Harris, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969 51 737 755 5783851
11. Patient Relevant Outcomes after total hip replacement. A comparison between different surgical techniques. AK Nilsdotter LS Lohmander, Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003 1 21 12816544 10.1186/1477-7525-1-21
12. [Evaluation of a German version of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Arthrosis Index]. G Stucki D Meier S Stucki BA Michel AG Tyndall W Dick R Theiler, Z Rheumatol 1996 55 40 49 8868149
13. A comparative study of peri-prosthetic bone mineral density measurement using two different dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems. B Cohen N Rushton, Br J Radiol 1994 67 852 855 7953225
14. [Validity and reproducibility of osteodensitometric DEXA-measurements following total hip endoprosthesis]. F Martini B Schmidt S Sell, Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1997 135 35 39 9199071
15. Bone mineral density of the proximal femur after unilateral cementless total hip replacement. F Martini E Kremling B Schmidt S Sell F Mayer, Int Orthop 1999 23 104 106 10.1007/s002640050318 10422026
16. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. TA Gruen GM McNeice HC Amstutz, Clin Orthop 1979 17 27 477100
17. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. The influence of the extent of porous coating. K Yamaguchi K Masuhara K Ohzono N Sugano T Nishii T Ochi, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000 82-A 1426 1431 11057471
18. Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. PR Aldinger D Sabo M Pritsch M Thomsen H Mau V Ewerbeck SJ Breusch, Calcif Tissue Int 2003 73 115 121 10.1007/s00223-002-2036-z 14565592
19. Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry - a 3-year follow-up study. PK Venesmaa HP Kroger HJ Miettinen JS Jurvelin OT Suomalainen EM Alhava, J Bone Miner Res 2001 16 1056 1061 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.6.1056 11393782
20. Effect of a stemless femoral implant for total hip arthroplasty on the bone mineral density of the proximal femur. A prospective longitudinal study. E Munting P Smitz N Van Sante C Nagant de Deuxchaisnes A Vincent JP Devogelaer, J Arthroplasty 1997 12 373 379 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90192-3 9195312
21. Analysis of a femoral hip prosthesis designed to reduce stress shielding. MG Joshi SG Advani F Miller MH Santare, J Biomech 2000 33 1655 1662 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00110-X 11006390
22. Longitudinal evaluation of time related bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. T Nishii N Sugano K Masuhara T Shibuya T Ochi S Tamura, Clin Orthop 1997 121 131 9186210
23. Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. JD Bobyn ES Mortimer AH Glassman CA Engh JE Miller CE Brooks, Clin Orthop 1992 79 96 1729025
24. Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. B Cohen N Rushton, J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995 77 479 483 7744941
25. Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density in hips with a custom-made femoral stem. F Martini C Lebherz F Mayer U Leichtle E Kremling S Sell, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000 82 1065 1071 10.1302/0301-620X.82B7. 9791 11041603
26. [Mid-term results of the cementless femoral neck prosthesis CUT]. SA Ender A Machner J Hubbe G Pap HW Neumann, Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2006 144 477 483 10.1055/s-2006-942265 16991063
27. [Early functional results with the Mayo-hip, a short stem system with metaphyseal-intertrochanteric fixation]. R Hube M Zaage W Hein H Reichel, Orthopade 2004 33 1249 1258 10.1007/s00132-004-0711-7 15549249
28. A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study. BF Morrey RA Adams M Kessler, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000 82 952 958 10.1302/0301-620X.82B7.10420 11041581