Current trends in total hip arthroplasty

Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 8-14

  Eingartner, Christoph ^a  

^a CARITAS KRANKENHAUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ceramic ceramic articulation; Minimal invasive surgery; Navigation; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; DISLOCATION; FEMUR SHAFT; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INJURY; INTERVERTEBRAL ARTICULATION; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; KINEMATICS; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; METAL IMPLANTATION; PATIENT POSITIONING; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; REHABILITATION CARE; REVIEW; SUBSTITUTION THERAPY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREND STUDY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK FACTORS; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 34249999477     PISSN: 15093492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Aldinger PR, Breusch SJ, Lukoschek M, Mau H, Ewerbeck V, Thomsen M . A ten- to 15-year follow-up of the cementless spotorno stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85: 209-214
2. Eingartner C, Heigele T, Volkmann R, Weise K . Long term results of an uncemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis. Hip International 2006;
3. Jenny JY, Clemens U, Kohler S, Kiefer H, Konermann W, Miehlke RK . Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 832-839
4. Kim SJ, MacDonald M, Hernandez J, Wixson RL . Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 123-131
5. Kiefer H, Othman A . OrthoPilot total hip arthroplasty workflow and surgery. Orthopedics 2005; 28: s1221-s1226
6. Honl M, Schwieger K, Gauck CH, Lampe F, Morlock MM, Wimmer MA, Hille E . Comparison of total hip replacements cup orientation and position. Navigation vs. conventional manual implantation of hip prostheses. Orthopade 2005; 34: 1131-1136
7. Leenders T, Vandevelde D, Mahieu G, Nuyts R . Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study. Comput Aided Surg 2002; 7: 99-106
8. Jerosch J, Theising C, Fadel ME . Antero-lateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach for total hip arthroplasty technique and early results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006; 126: 164-173
9. Light TR, Keggi KJ . Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 255-260
10. Rittmeister M, Peters A . A posterior mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty - results of 76 consecutive cases. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2005; 143: 403-411
11. Keggi KJ, Huo MH, Zatorski LE . Anterior approach to total hip replacement: surgical technique and clinical results of our first one thousand cases using non-cemented prostheses. Yale J Biol Med 1993; 66: 243-256
12. Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS, Zatorski LE, Huo MH, Keggi KJ . Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A Suppl 4: 39-48
13. Wohlrab D, Hagel A, Hein W . Advantages of minimal invasive total hip replacement in the early phase of rehabilitation. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004; 142: 685-690.
14. Krismer M, Nogler M, Rachbauer F. (2004) Direct, anterior, single incision approach. In: Hozak WJ, Krismer M, Nogler M, Bonutti PM, Rachbauer F, Schaffer JL, Donelly WJ (Hrsg) Minimal invasive joint arthroplasty. Springer, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo. 4-10.
15. Oinuma K, Eingartner C, Saito Y, Shiratsuchi H Total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach. Operat Orthop Traumatol 2006 (in press)
16. Nogler M . Navigated minimal invasive total hip arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int 2004; 12: 259-262
17. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A . Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 324-329
18. McMinn D, Daniel J . History and modern concepts in surface replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H ] 2006; 220: 239-251
19. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P . Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; S89-S98
20. Morrey BF . Short-stemmed uncemented femoral component for primary hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 169-175
21. Morrey BF, Adams RA, Kessler M . Aconservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. Aprospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82: 952-958
22. Shimmin AJ, Back D . Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 463-464
23. Eingartner C, Ilchmann T, Dieter J, Weise K . Subsidence pattern of a cementless straight titanium femoral stem - a radiographic study with EBRA-FCA. Hip International 2005; 15: 85-91
24. Eingartner C, Volkmann R, Winter E, Maurer F, Sauer G, Weller S, Weise K . Results of an uncemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis after 9 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 440-447
25. Heisel C, Silva M, Schmalzried TP . Bearing surface options for total hip replacement in young patients. Instr Course Lect 2004; 53: 49-65
26. Hannouche D, Nich C, Bizot P, Meunier A, Nizard R, Sedel L . Fractures of ceramic bearings: history and present status. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 19-26
27. Park YS, Hwang SK, Choy WS, Kim YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ . Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an aluminaon-alumina bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 780-787