National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Efficacy Trials of Bionator Class II Treatment: A Review

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 72, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 571-575

  Jacobs, Thomas ^a   Sawaengkit, Pornrachanee ^b  

^a Mahidol University ^*  (United States)

^b MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Bionator; Class II malocclusion; Efficacy; Functional appliance; Review

Indexed keywords

CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LITERATURE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES; CHILD; DENTAL RESEARCH; EXTRAORAL TRACTION APPLIANCES; FLORIDA; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); NORTH CAROLINA; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; REVIEW LITERATURE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036983380     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Antezak-Bouckoms A. The anatomy of clinical research. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:75-79.
2. Ghafari J, King GJ, Tulloch JFC. Early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion - comparison of alterative treatment modalities. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:107-117.
3. Tulloch JFC, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:340-347.
4. Tulloch JFC. Bias and variability in clinical research. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:94-96.
5. Sackett DL. On identifying the best therapy. In: Trotman CA, McNamara JA, eds. Orthodontic Treatment: Outcome and Effectiveness. Craniofacial Growth Series Vol. 30. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth & Development, The University of Michigan; 1994:7-19.
6. Keeling SD, King GJ, Wheeler TT, McGorray S. Timing of Class II treatment: rationale, methods, and early results of an ongoing randomized clinical trial. In: Trotman CA, McNamara JA, eds. Orthodontic Treatment: Outcome and Effectiveness. Craniofacial Growth Series Vol. 30. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth & Development, The University of Michigan; 1994:81-112.
7. Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen DA, Cabass S, McGorray SP, Taylor MG. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:40-50.
8. Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Dolce C, Taylor MG, King GJ. Effectiveness of early treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orhop. 2002;121:9-17.
9. Tulloch JFC, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Early vs. late treatment of Class II malocclusion: preliminary results from the UNC clinical trial. In: Trotman CA, McNamara JA, eds. Orthodontic Treatment: Outcome and Effectiveness. Craniofacial Growth Series Vol. 30. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth & Development, The University of Michigan; 1994:113-138.
10. Tulloch JFC, Philips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orhop. 1997; 111:391-400.
11. Tulloch JFC, Profitt WR, Phillips C. Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orhop. 1997;111:533-542.