Competition for composition: Lessons from nectar-feeding ant communities

Ecology

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1479-1485

  Blüthgen, Nico ^a,b   Fiedler, Konrad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Amino acids; Anonychomyrma gilberti; Carbohydrates; Formicidae; Interspecific competition; Nectar composition; Nectar feeding ants; Niche partitioning; Oecophylla smaragdina; Tropical rain forests

Indexed keywords

ANT; FOOD PREFERENCE; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; NECTAR; NECTARIVORY;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA;

ANIMALIA; ANONYCHOMYRMA; ANONYCHOMYRMA GILBERTI; FORMICIDAE; HEMIPTERA; HYMENOPTERA; OECOPHYLLA; OECOPHYLLA SMARAGDINA;

EID: 4043160203     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/03-0430     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alm, J., T. E. Ohnmeiss, J. Lanza, and L. Vriesenga. 1990. Preference of cabbage white butterflies and honey bees for nectar that contains amino acids. Oecologia 84:53-57.
2. Andersen, A. N. 1995. A classification of Australian ant communities, based on functional groups which parallel plant life-forms in relation to stress and disturbance. Journal of Biogeography 22:15-29.
3. Baker, H. G., and I. Baker. 1973. Amino acids in nectar and their evolutionary significance. Nature 24:543-545.
4. Baker, H. G., and I. Baker. 1975. Studies of nectar constitution and pollinator-plant coevolution. Pages 100-140 in L. E. Gilbert and P. H. Raven, editors. Co-evolution of animals and plants. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas, USA.
5. Biesmeijer, J. C., J. A. P. Richter, M. A. J. P. Smeets, and M. J. Sommeijer. 1999. Niche differentiation in nectar-collecting stingless bees: the influence of morphology, floral choice and interference competition. Ecological Entomology 24:380-388.
6. Blüthgen, N., and K. Fiedler. 2002. Interactions between weaver ants (Oecophylla smaragdina), homopterans, trees and lianas in an Australian rainforest canopy. Journal of Animal Ecology 71:793-801.
7. Blüthgen, N., and K. Fiedler. 2004. Preferences for sugars and amino acids and their conditionality in a diverse nectar-feeding ant community. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:155-166.
8. Blüthgen, N., G. Gebauer, and K. Fiedler. 2003. Disentangling rainforest food webs using stable isotopes: dietary diversity in a species-rich ant community. Oecologia 137:426-435.
9. Blüthgen, N., G. Gottsberger, and K. Fiedler. 2004a. Sugar and amino acid composition of ant-attended nectar and honeydew sources from an Australian rainforest. Austral Ecology 29, in press.
10. Blüthgen, N., and K. Reifenrath. 2003. Extrafloral nectaries in an Australian rainforest - structure and distribution. Australian Journal of Botany 51:515-527.
11. Blüthgen, N., N. E. Stork, and K. Fiedler. 2004b. Bottom-up control and co-occurence in complex communities: Honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest ant mosaic. Oikos 105, in press.
12. Blüthgen, N., M. Verhaagh, W. Goitía, K. Jaffé, W. Morawetz, and W. Barthlott. 2000. How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125:229-240.
13. Bowers, M. A. 1985. Experimental analyses of competition between two species of bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Oecologia 67:224-230.
14. Cassill, D. L., and W. R. Tschinkel. 1999. Regulation of diet in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Journal of Insect Behavior 12:307-328.
15. Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18:117-143.
16. Davidson, D. W. 1997. The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61:153-181.
17. Davidson, D. W., S. C. Cook, R. R. Snelling, and T. H. Chua. 2003. Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300:969-972.
18. Dejean, A., T. Bourgoin, and M. Gibernau. 1997. Ant species that protect figs against other ants: result of territoriality induced by a mutualistic homopteran. Ecoscience 4:446-453.
19. Dejean, A., and B. Corbara. 2003. A review of mosaics of dominant ants in rainforests and plantations. Pages 341-347 in Y. Basset, V. Novotny, S. E. Miller, and R. L. Kitching, editors. Arthropods of tropical forests: spatio-temporal dynamics and resource use in the canopy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
20. Dreisig, H. 1988. Foraging rate of ants collecting honeydew or extrafloral nectar, and some possible constraints. Ecological Entomology 13:143-154.
21. Dreisig, H. 1995. Ideal free distributions of nectar foraging bumblebees. Oikos 72:161-172.
22. Erhardt, A., and H. P. Rusterholz. 1998. Do peacock butterflies (Inachis io L.) detect and prefer nectar amino acids and other nitrogenous compounds? Oecologia 117:536-542.
23. Gardener, M. C., and M. P. Gillman. 2002. The taste of nectar - a neglected area of pollination ecology. Oikos 98:552-557.
24. Gottsberger, G., J. Schrauwen, and H. F. Linskens. 1984. Amino acids and sugars in nectar, and their putative evolutionary significance. Plant Systematics and Evolution 145:55-77.
25. Hölldobler, B. 1983. Territorial behavior in the green tree ant (Oecophylla smaragdina). Biotropica 15:241-250.
26. Hossaert-McKey, M., J. Orivel, E. Labeyrie, L. Pascal, J. H. C. Delabie, and A. Dejean. 2001. Differential associations with ants of three co-occurring extrafloral nectary-bearing plants. Ecoscience 8:325-335.
27. Inouye, D. W. 1978. Resource partitioning in bumblebees: experimental studies of foraging behavior. Ecology 59:672-678.
28. Inouye, D. W., and G. D. Waller. 1984. Responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera) to amino acid solutions mimicking floral nectars. Ecology 65:618-625.
29. Jackson, D. 1984. Competition in the tropics: ants on trees. Antenna 8:19-22.
30. Kevan, P., and H. B. Baker. 1983. Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. Annual Review of Entomology 28:407-454.
31. Kikuchi, T. 1963. Studies on the coaction among insects visiting flowers. III. Dominance relationships among flower-visiting flies, bees and butterflies. Science Reports of the Tôhoku University Series IV (Biology) 29:1-8.
32. Koptur, S., and N. Truong. 1998. Facultative ant-plant interactions: nectar sugar preferences of introduced pest ant species in south Florida. Biotropica 30:179-189.
33. Lanza, J. 1991. Response of fire ants (Formicidae: Solenopsis invicta and S. geminata) to artificial nectars with amino acids. Ecological Entomology 16:203-210.
34. Lanza, J., and B. R. Krauss. 1984. Detection of amino acids in artificial nectars by two tropical ants, Leptothorax and Monomorium. Oecologia 63:423-425.
35. Lanza, J., E. L. Vargo, S. Pulim, and Y. Z. Chang. 1993. Preferences of the fire ants Solenopsis invicta and S. geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) for amino acid and sugar components of extrafloral nectars. Environmental Entomology 22:411-417.
36. Laverty, T. M., and R. C. Plowright. 1985. Competition between hummingbirds and bumble bees for nectar in flowers of Impatiens biflora. Oecologia 66:25-32.
37. Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Second edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
38. Majer, J. D. 1993. Comparison of the arboreal ant mosaic in Ghana, Brazil, Papua New Guinea and Australia - its structure and influence on arthropod diversity. Pages 115-141 in J. LaSalle and I. D. Gauld, editors. Hymenoptera and biodiversity. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
39. Martínez del Rio, C. 1990. Dietary, phylogenetic, and ecological correlates of intestinal sucrase and maltase activity in birds. Physiological Zoology 63:987-1011.
40. Monteith, G. B. 1986. Some curious insect-plant associations in Queensland. Queensland Naturalist 26:105-114.
41. Morse, D. H. 1981. Interactions among syrphid flies and bumblebees on flowers. Ecology 62:81-88.
42. Nagamitsu, T., and T. Inoue. 1997. Aggressive foraging of social bees as a mechanism of floral resource partitioning in an Asian tropical rainforest. Oecologia 110:432-439.
43. Nonacs, P., and L. M. Dill. 1990. Mortality risk vs. food quality trade-offs in a common currency: ant patch preferences. Ecology 71:1886-1892.
44. Ohashi, K., and T. Yahara. 2002. Visit larger displays but probe proportionally fewer flowers: counterintuitive behaviour of nectar-collecting bumble bees achieves an ideal free distribution. Functional Ecology 16:492-503.
45. Ollerton, J., and L. Cranmer. 2002. Latitudinal trends in plant-pollinator interactions: are tropical plants more specialised? Oikos 98:340-350.
46. Pimm, S. L., M. L. Rosenzweig, and W. Mitchell. 1985. Competition and food selection: field tests of a theory. Ecology 66:798-807.
47. Pyke, G. H. 1982. Local geographic distributions of bumblebees near Crested Butte, Colorado: competition and community structure. Ecology 63:555-573.
48. Roubik, D. W., and S. L. Buchmann. 1984. Nectar selection by Melipona and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the ecology of nectar intake by bee colonies in a tropical forest. Oecologia 61:1-10.
49. Roubik, D. W., D. Yanega, M. Aluja, S. L. Buchmann, and D. W. Inouye. 1995. On optimal nectar foraging by some tropical bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Apidologie 26:197-211.
50. Rusterholz, H. P., and A. Erhardt. 2000. Can nectar properties explain sex-specific flower preferences in the Adonis Blue butterfly Lysandra bellargus? Ecological Entomology 25:81-90
51. Savolainen, R., and K. Vepsäläinen. 1988. A competition hierarchy among boreal ants: impact on resource partitioning and community structure. Oikos 51:135-155.
52. Schemske, D. W. 1982. Ecological correlates of a neotropical mutualism: ant assemblages at Costus extrafloral nectaries. Ecology 63:932-941.
53. StatSoft. 1999. Statistica for Windows 5. 5. StatSoft, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
54. Sudd, J. H., and M. E. Sudd. 1985. Seasonal changes in the response of wood-ants (Formica lugubris) to sucrose baits. Ecological Entomology 10:89-97.
55. Thomson, J. D. 1989. Reversal of apparent feeding preferences of bumble bees by aggression from Vespula wasps. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67:2588-2591.
56. Wäckers, F. L. 1999. Gustatory response by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata to a range of nectar and honeydew sugars. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25:2863-2877.
57. Wada, A., Y. Isobe, S. Yamaguchi, R. Yamaoka, and M. Ozaki. 2001. Taste-enhancing effects of glycine on the sweetness of glucose: a gustatory aspect of symbiosis between the ant, Camponotus japonicus, and the larvae of the lycaenid butterfly, Niphanda fusca. Chemical Senses 26:983-992.
58. Waser, N. M., L. Chittka, M. V. Price, N. M. Williams, and J. Ollerton. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043-1060.