Design of an inversion center between two helical segments

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 32, 2004, Pages 10049-10052

  Maurizot, Victor ^a   Dolain, Christel ^a   Leydet, Yoann ^a   Léger, Jean Michel ^b   Guionneau, Philippe ^c   Huc, Ivan ^a  

^a INSTITUT EUROPÉEN DE CHIMIE ET BIOLOGIE   (France)

^b Laboratoire de Pharmacochimie   (France)

^c INST CHIM MATIERE COND BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINES; AMINO ACIDS; CARBOXYLIC ACIDS;

AROMATIC LINKER; HELICAL SEGMENTS; STERIC EXCLUSION;

OLIGOMERS;

8 AMINO 2 QUINOLINECARBOXYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CARBOXYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; OLIGOMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; REACTION ANALYSIS; STEREOSPECIFICITY; SYNTHESIS;

BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; NYLONS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; QUINOLINES; SOLUTIONS;

EID: 4043138620     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0481981     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. For reviews see: (a) Huc, I. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 17-29.
2. (b) Guichard, G. β-Peptides, γ-Peptides and Isosteric Backbones. In Pseudo-Peptides in Drug Discovery; Nielsen, P. E., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004; pp 33-113.
3. (c) Hill, D. J.; Mio, M. J.; Prince, R. B.; Hughes, T. S.; Moore, J. S. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3893-4011.
4. (d) Cheng, R. P.; Gellman, S. H.; DeGrado, W. F. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3219-3232.
5. (e) D. Seebach, J. L. Matthews, Chem. Commun. 1997, 2015-2022.
6. For recent examples see: (a) De Pol, S.; Zorn, C.; Klein, C. D.; Zerbe, O.; Reiser, O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 511-514.
7. (b) Hayen, A.; Schmitt, M. A.; Ngassa, F. N.; Thomasson, K. A.; Gellman, S. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 505-510.
8. (a) Liu, D.; Choi, S.; Chen, B.; Doerksen, R. J.; Clements, D. J.; Winkler, J. D.; Klein, M. L. DeGrado, W. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1158-1162.
9. (b) Porter, E. A.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7324-7330.
10. (c) Raguse, T. L.; Porter, E. A.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12774-12785.
11. (d) Porter, E. A.; Wang, X.; Lee, H.-S.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H. Nature 2000, 404, 565.
12. (e) Hamuro, Y.; Schneider, J. P.; DeGrado, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 12200-12201.
13. Ernst, J. T.; Becerril, J.; Park, H. S.; Yin, H.; Hamilton, A. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 535-539.
14. For example see: (a) Shelman's: Karle, I. L.; Das, C.; Balaram, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 3034-3039.
15. (b) Diaz, H.; Espina, J. R.; Kelly, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8316-8318.
16. (c) Akerfeldt, K. S.; Kim, R. M. Camac, D.; Groves, J. T. Lear, J. D.; DeGrado, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 9656-9657.
17. (d) Mutter, M.; Tuchscherer, G. G.; Miller, C.; Altmann, K. H.; Carey, R. I.; Wyss, D. F.; Labhardt, A. M.; Rivier, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1463-1470.
18. (e) Ghadiri, M. R.; Soares, C.; Choi, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4000-4002.
19. For example: (a) Laplaza, C. E.; Holm, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10255-10264.
20. (b) Goodman, M.; Feng, Y.; Melacini, G.; Taulane, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5156-5157.
21. (c) Schneider, J. P.; Kelly, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2533-2546.
22. (d) Suzuki, K.; Hiroaki, H.; Kohda, D.; Nakamura, H.; Tanaka, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 13008-13015.
23. (a) Jiang, H.; Léger, J.-M.; Huc, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3448-3449.
24. (b) Jiang, H.; Léger, J.-M.; Dolain, C.; Guionneau, P.; Huc, I. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 8365-8374.
25. Marvel, K. J. Org. Chem. 1953, 18, 707-714.
26. The poor quality of this structure is due to weak diffraction intensity and strong disorganization of isobutyl side chains and included solvent molecules, some of which show partial occupancy factors.
27. (a) Blay, G.; Fernández, I.; Pedro, J. R.; Ruiz-García, R.; Muñoz, M. C.; Cano, J.; Carrasco, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 1627-1630.
28. (b) Plasseraud, L.; Maid, H.; Hampel, F.; Saalfrank, R. W. Chem.-Eur. J. 2001, 7, 4007-4011.
29. In the spectrum of 2, the signals of H4 and H2, at 6.92 and 8.58 ppm, respectively, overlap with other signals belonging to the quinoline protons. However, they can be unambiguously assigned from 2D NMR experiments.
30. Jiang, H.; Dolain, C.; Léger, J.-M.; Gornitzka, H.; Huc, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004. 126, 1034-1035.
31. As suggested by a reviewer, one set of signals with diastereotopic patterns could, in principle, be observed when the P-M helix inverts slowly on the NMR time scale, and when a small fraction of P-P and M-M helices are in fast exchange with the P-M helix. The signals of the P-P and M-M enantiomers should then appear at low temperature when inversion of all helices becomes slow. However, low-temperature studies on 2 and 3 showed that this is not the case. For both compounds, only one species prevails in solution.
32. Wu, Z.-Q.; Jiang, X.-K.; Zhu, S.-Z.; Li, Z.-T. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 229-232.