A meta-analysis of factors affecting local adaptation between interacting species

American Naturalist

Volumn 171, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 275-290

  Hoeksema, Jason D ^a,b,c   Forde, Samantha E ^b  

^a NATIONAL EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Host parasite; Local adaptation; Meta analysis; Mutualism

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; DIVERGENCE; FITNESS; GENE FLOW; GENOTYPE; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; META-ANALYSIS; MUTUALISM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; META ANALYSIS; MICROBIOLOGY; PARASITOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; SYMBIOSIS;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PLANTS; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 40349092689     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/527496     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Adams, D. C., J. Gurevitch, and M. S. Rosenberg. 1997. Resampling tests for meta-analysis of ecological data. Ecology 78:1277-1283.
2. Agrawal, A., and C. M. Lively. 2002. Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching-alleles models and all points in between. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4:79-90.
3. Altizer, S. M. 2001. Migratory behaviour and host-parasite co-evolution in natural populations of monarch butterflies infected with a protozoan parasite. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3:611-632.
4. Bell, G., and A. O. Mooers. 1997. Size and complexity among multicellular organisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60:345-363.
5. Bergstrom, C. T., and M. Lachmann. 2003. The Red King effect: when the slowest runner wins the coevolutionary race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100:593-598.
6. Campbell, N. A., and J. B. Reece. 2004. Biology. Cummings, San Francisco.
7. Capelle, J., and C. Neema. 2005. Local adaptation and population structure at a micro-geographical scale of a fungal parasite on its host plant. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:1445-1454.
8. Dawkins, R., and J. R. Krebs. 1979. Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 205:489-511.
9. Dias, P. C. 1996. Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11:326-330.
10. Doebeli, M., and N. Knowlton. 1998. The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95:8676-8680.
11. Dufva, R. 1996. Sympatric and allopatric combinations of hen fleas and great tits: a test of the local adaptation hypothesis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9:505-510.
12. Dybdahl, M. F., and A. Storfer. 2003. Parasite local adaptation: Red Queen versus Suicide King. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:523-530.
13. Ebert, D. 1994. Virulence and local adaptation of a horizontally transmitted parasite. Science 265:1084-1086.
14. Ebert, D., and W. D. Hamilton. 1996. Sex against virulence: the coevolution of parasitic diseases. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11:79-82.
15. Emery, C. 1909. Über den Ursprung der dulotischen, parasitischen und myrmikophilen Ameisen. Biologisches Centralblatt 29:352-362.
16. Ewald, P. W. 1987. Transmission modes and evolution of the parasitism-mutualism continuum. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 503:295-306.
17. Fischer, B., and S. Foitzik. 2004. Local co-adaptation leading to a geographical mosaic in a social parasite system. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17:1026-1034.
18. Forde, S. E., J. N. Thompson, and B. J. M. Bohannan. 2004. Adaptation varies through time and space in a coevolving host-parasitoid interaction. Nature 431:841-844.
19. Frank, S. A. 1993. Specificity versus detectable polymorphism in host-parasite genetics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 254:191-197.
20. Gandon, S. 2002. Local adaptation and the geometry of host-parasite coevolution. Ecology Letters 5:246-256.
21. Gandon, S., and Y. Michalakis. 2002. Local adaptation, evolutionary potential and host-parasite coevolution: interactions between migration, mutation, population size and generation time. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15:451-462.
22. Gandon, S., Y. Capowiez, Y. Dubois, Y. Michalakis, and I. Olivieri. 1996. Local adaptation and gene-for-gene coevolution in a meta-population model. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263:1003-1009.
23. Ganz, H. H., and J. O. Washburn. 2006. Relative migration rates and local adaptation in a mosquito-protozoan interaction. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19:816-824.
24. Garant, D., S. E. Forde, and A. P. Hendry. 2007. The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation. Functional Ecology 21:434-443.
25. Gasnier, N., D. Rondelaud, M. Abrous, F. Carreras, C. Boulard, P. Diez-Baños, and J. Cabaret. 2000. Allopatric combination of Fasciola hepatica and Lymnaea truncatula is more efficient than sympatric ones. International Journal of Parasitology 30:573-578.
26. Goff, L. J., J. Ashen, and D. Moon. 1997. The evolution of parasites from their hosts: a case study in the parasitic red algae. Evolution 51:1068-1078.
27. Goss, E. M., and J. Bergelson. 2006. Variation in resistance and virulence in the interaction between Arabidopsis thaliana and a bacterial pathogen. Evolution 60:1562-1573.
28. Greischar, M. A., and B. Koskella. 2007. A synthesis of experimental work on parasite local adaptation. Ecology Letters 10:418-434.
29. Gurevitch, J., and L. V. Hedges. 1999. Statistical issues in ecological meta-analysis. Ecology 80:1142-1149.
30. Hafner, M. S., P. D. Sudman, F. X. Villablanca, T. A. Spradling, J. W. Demastes, and S. A. Nadler. 1994. Disparate rates of molecular evolution in cospeciating hosts and parasites. Science 265:1087-1090.
31. Hanks, L. M., and R. F. Denno. 1994. Local adaptation in the armored scale insect Pseudaulacaspis pentagona (Homoptera: Diaspididae). Ecology 75:2301-2310.
32. Hatcher, M. J., J. C. Hogg, and A. M. Dunn. 2005. Local adaptation and enhanced virulence of Nosema granulosis artificially introduced into novel populations of its crustacean host, Gammarus duebeni. International Journal of Parasitology 35:265-274.
33. Hedges, L. V., and I. Olkin. 1980. Vote-counting methods in research synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 88:359-369.
34. _. 1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
35. Hedges, L. V., J. Gurevitch, and P. S. Curtis. 1999. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150-1156.
36. Herre, E. A., N. Knowlton, U. G. Mueller, and S. A. Rehner. 1999. The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14:49-53.
37. Higgins, J. P. T., and S. G. Thompson. 2004. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression. Statistics in Medicine 23:1663-1682.
38. Hochberg, M. E., R. Gomulkiewicz, R. D. Holt, and J. N. Thompson. 2000. Weak sinks could cradle mutualistic symbioses: strong sources should harbour parasitic symbioses. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13:213-222.
39. Hoeksema, J. D., and J. N. Thompson. 2007. Geographic structure in a widespread plant-mycorrhizal interaction: pines and false truffles. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:1148-1163.
40. Imhoof, B., and P. Schmid-Hempel. 1998. Patterns of local adaptation of a protozoan parasite to its bumblebee host. Oikos 82:59-65.
41. Jackson, J. A., and R. C. Tinsley. 2005. Geographic and within-population structure in variable resistance to parasite species and strains in a vertebrate host. International Journal of Parasitology 35:29-37.
42. Johnson, N. C., J. H. Graham, and F. A. Smith. 1997. Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phytologist 135:575-585.
43. Kaltz, O., and J. A. Shykoff. 1998. Local adaptation in host-parasite systems. Heredity 81:361-370.
44. Kaltz, O., S. Gandon, Y. Michalakis, and J. A. Shykoff. 1999. Local maladaptation in the anther-smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum to its host plant Silene latifolia: evidence from a cross-inoculation experiment. Evolution 53:395-407.
45. Karban, R. 1989. Fine-scale adaptation of herbivorous thrips to individual host plants. Nature 340:60-61.
46. Kawecki, T. J., and D. Ebert. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecology Letters 7:1225-1241.
47. Koskela, T., V. Salonen, and P. Mutikainen. 2000. Local adaptation of a holoparasitic plant, Cuscuta europaea: variation among populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13:749-755.
48. Krist, A. C., C. M. Lively, E. P. Levri, and J. Jokela. 2000. Spatial variation in susceptibility to infection in a snail-trematode interaction. Parasitology 121:395-401.
49. Laine, A.-L. 2005. Spatial scale of local adaptation in a plant-pathogen metapopulation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:930-938.
50. Lajeunesse, M. J., and M. J. Forbes. 2002. Host range and local parasite adaptation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269:703-710.
51. Lenormand, T. 2002. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:183-189.
52. Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
53. Lively, C. M. 1989. Adaptation by a parasitic trematode to local populations of its snail host. Evolution 43:1663-1671.
54. _. 1999. Migration, virulence, and the geographic mosaic of adaptation by parasites. American Naturalist 153(suppl.):S34-S47.
55. Lively, C. M., M. F. Dybdahl, J. Jokela, E. E. Osnas, and L. F. Delph. 2004. Host sex and local adaptation by parasites in a snail-trematode interaction. American Naturalist 164(suppl.):S6-S18.
56. Lowe, R. M., S. A. Ward, and R. H. Crozier. 2002. The evolution of parasites from their hosts: intra- and interspecific parasitism and Emery's rule. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269:1301-1305.
57. Mayr, E. 1970. Populations, species and evolution: an abridgement of animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
58. McCoy, K. D., T. Boulinier, S. Schjørring, and Y. Michalakis. 2002. Local adaptation of the ectoparasite Ixodes uriae to its seabird host. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4:441-456.
59. Morgan, A. D., and A. Buckling. 2006. Relative number of generations of hosts and parasites does not influence parasite local adaptation in coevolving populations of bacteria and phages. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19:1956-1963.
60. Morgan, A. D., S. Gandon, and A. Buckling. 2005. The effect of migration on local adaptation in a coevolving host-parasite system. Nature 437:253-256.
61. Morgan, A. D., M. A. Brockhurst, L. D. C. Lopez-Pascua, C. Pal, and A. Buckling. 2007. Differential impact of simultaneous migration on coevolving hosts and parasites. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7:1.
62. Mutikainen, P., V. Salonen, T. Koskela, and S. Puustinen. 2000. Local adaptation, resistance, and virulence in a hemiparasitic plant-host plant interaction. Evolution 54:433-440.
63. Neuhauser, C., and J. E. Fargione. 2004. A mutualism-parasitism continuum model and its application to plant-mycorrhizae interactions. Ecological Modelling 177:337-352.
64. Niemi, L., A. Wennstrom, J. Hjalten, P. Waldmann, and L. Ericson. 2006. Spatial variation in resistance and virulence in the host-pathogen system Salix triandra-Melampsora amygdalinae. Journal of Ecology 94:915-921.
65. Nuismer, S. L. 2006. Parasite local adaptation in a geographic mosaic. Evolution 60:24-30.
66. Oppliger, A., R. Vernet, and M. Baez. 1999. Parasite local maladaptation in the Canarian lizard Gallotia galloti (Reptilia: Lacertidae) parasitized by haemogregarian blood parasite. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12:951-955.
67. Orr, H. A. 2000. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54:13-20.
68. Parker, M. A. 1994. Pathogens and sex in plants. Evolutionary Ecology 8:560-584.
69. _. 1995. Plant fitness variation caused by different mutualist genotypes. Ecology 76:1525-1535.
70. Peters, A. D., and C. M. Lively. 1999. The Red Queen and fluctuating epistasis: a population genetic analysis of antagonistic coevolution. American Naturalist 154:393-405.
71. Price, P. W. 1980. Evolutionary biology of parasites. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
72. Ridenhour, B. J., and S. L. Nuismer. 2007. Polygenic traits and parasite local adaptation. Evolution 61:368-376.
73. Rosenberg, M. S., D. C. Adams, and J. Gurevitch. 2000. Metawin, version 2.0: statistical software for meta-analysis. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
74. Ruhnke, H., M. Schädler, D. Matthies, S. Klotz, and R. Brandl. 2006. Are sawflies adapted to individual host trees? a test of the adaptive deme formation hypothesis. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8:1039-1048.
75. Slatkin, M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:393-430.
76. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman, New York.
77. Springer, Y. P. 2007. Clinal resistance structure and pathogen local adaptation in a serpentine flax-flax rust interaction. Evolution 61:1812-1822.
78. Thompson, J. N. 1994. The coevolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
79. _. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
80. Thompson, J. N., S. L. Nuismer, and R. Gomulkiewicz. 2002. Coevolution and maladaptation. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42:381-387.
81. Thrall, P. H., J. J. Burdon, and J. D. Bever. 2002. Local adaptation in the Linum marginale-Melampsora lini host-pathogen interaction. Evolution 56:1340-1351.
82. Underwood, A. J. 1997. Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
83. van Houwelingen, H. C., L. R. Arends, and T. Stijnen. 2002. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Statistics in Medicine 21:589-624.
84. Van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory 1:1-30.
85. Van Zandt, P. A., and S. Mopper. 1998. A meta-analysis of adaptive deme formation in phytophagous insect populations. American Naturalist 152:597-606.
86. Welch, J. J., and D. Waxman. 2003. Modularity and the cost of complexity. Evolution 57:1723-1734.
87. Wilkinson, H. H., J. M. Spoerke, and M. A. Parker. 1996. Divergence in symbiotic compatibility in a legume-Bradyrhizobium mutualism. Evolution 50:1470-1477.
88. Wilson, E. O. 1971. The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.