Adaptation varies through space and time in a coevolving host-parasitoid interaction

Nature

Volumn 431, Issue 7010, 2004, Pages 841-844

  Forde, Samantha E ^a,b   Thompson, John N ^b   Bohannan, Brendan J M ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BACTERIOPHAGES; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; PRODUCTIVITY;

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; LANDSCAPES; PARASITOIDS; SPATIAL VARIATIONS;

BIODIVERSITY;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOGEOGRAPHY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BACTERIOPHAGE; BACTERIUM; BIODIVERSITY; COEVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; LANDSCAPE; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; SPACE; THEORY; TIME;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BACTERIOPHAGE T7; ESCHERICHIA COLI; EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHY; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; POPULATION DENSITY; SELECTION (GENETICS); TIME FACTORS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); UNIDENTIFIED BACTERIOPHAGE;

EID: 7244237915     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature02906     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Thompson, J. N. The Coevolutionary Process (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994).
2. Brodie, E. D. Jr, Ridenhour, B. J. & Brodie, E. D. III The evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: hotspots and coldspots in the geographic mosaic of coevolution between garter snakes and newts. Evolution 56, 2067-2082 (2002).
3. Burdon, J. J. & Thrall, P. H. Spatial and temporal patterns in coevolving plant and pathogen associations. Am. Nat. 153, S15-S33 (2002).
4. Zangerl, A. R. & Berenbaum, M. R. Phenotype matching in wild parsnip and parsnip webworms: causes and consequences. Evolution 57, 806-815 (2003).
5. Thompson, J. N. & Cunningham, B. M. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417, 735-738 (2002).
6. Benkman, C. W., Parchman, T. L., Favis, A. & Siepielski, A. M. Reciprocal selection causes a revolutionary arms race between crossbills and lodgepole pine. Am. Nat. 162, 182-194 (2003).
7. Nuismer, S. L., Thompson, J. N. & Gomulkiewicz, R. Gene flow and geographically structured coevolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 605-609 (1999).
8. Hochberg, M. & van Baalen, M. Antagonistic coevolution over productivity gradients. Am. Nat. 152, 620-634 (1998).
9. Chao, L., Levin, B. R. & Stewart, F. M. A complex community in a simple habitat: an experimental study with bacteria and phage. Ecology 58, 369-378 (1977).
10. Lenski, R. E. & Levin, B. R. Constraints on the coevolution of bacteria and virulent phage: a model, some experiments, and predictions for natural communities. Am. Nat. 125, 585-602 (1985).
11. Shrag, S. J. & Mittler, J. E. Host-parasite coexistence: the role of spatial refuges in stabilizing bacteriaphage interactions. Am. Nat. 148, 348-377 (1996).
12. Bohannan, B. J. M. & Lenski, R. E. The relative importance of competition and predation varies with productivity in a model system. Am. Nat. 156, 329-340 (2000).
13. Buckling, A. & Rainey, P. B. Antagonistic coevolution between a bacterium and a bacteriophage. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 931-936 (2002).
14. Thompson, J. N. The evolution of species interactions. Science 284, 2116-2118 (1999).
15. Bohannan, B. J. M. & Lenski, R. E. The effect of resource enrichment on a chemostat community of bacteria and phage. Ecology 78, 2303-2315 (1997).
16. Gandon, S. Local adaptation and the geometry of host-parasite coevolution. Ecol. Lett. 5, 246-256 (2002).
17. Gandon, S. & Michalakis, Y. Local adaptation, evolutionary potential and host-parasite coevolution: interactions between migration, mutation, population size and generation time. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 451-162 (2002).
18. Gomulkiewicz, R., Thompson, J. N., Holt, R. D., Nuismer, S. L. & Hochberg, M. E. Hot spots, cold spots and the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. Am. Nat. 156, 156-174 (2000).
19. Slatkin, M. Gene flow in natural populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 393-430 (1985).
20. Futuyma, D. J. Evolutionary Biology, 3rd edn (Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, 1998).
21. Gandon, S., Capowiez, Y., Dubios, Y., Michalakis, Y. & Olivieri, I. Local adaptation and gene-for-gene coevolution in a metapopulation model. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1003-1009 (1996).
22. Buckling, A., Wills, M. A. & Colegrave, N. Adaptation limits diversification of experimental bacterial populations. Science 302, 2107-2109 (2003).
23. Brockhurst, M. A., Morgan, A. D., Rainey, P. B. & Buckling, A. Population mixing accelerates coevolution. Ecol. Lett. 6, 975-979 (2003).
24. Bohannan, B. J. M. & Lenski, R. E. Effect of prey heterogeneity on the response of a model food chain to resource enrichment. Am. Nat. 153, 73-82 (1999).
25. Rice, W. R. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223-225 (1989).