Drug preference in cocaine and alcohol dual-dependent patients

American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 211-217

  Lau Barraco, Cathy ^a   Schmitz, Joy M ^b  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE ON ADDICTIONS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Cocaine; Crossover point; Dual dependence; Multiple choice questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; COCAINE;

ADULT; ALCOHOL ABUSE; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG PREFERENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; DIAGNOSIS, DUAL (PSYCHIATRY); ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 39749128995     PISSN: 00952990     EISSN: 10979891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00952990701877136     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Griffiths RR, Troisi JR, Silverman K, Mumford GK. Multiple-choice procedure: An efficient approach for investigating drug reinforcement in humans. Behav Pharmacol 1993; 4:3-13.
2. Griffiths RR, Rush CR, Puhala KA. Validation of the multiple-choice procedure for investigating drug reinforcement in humans. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1996; 4:97-106.
3. Smith BJ, Jones SE, Griffiths RR. Physiological, subjective and reinforcing effects of oral and intravenous cocaine in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2001; 156:435-444.
4. Tancer M, Johanson C. The effects of fluoxetine on the subjective and physiological effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA)in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007; 189:565-573.
5. Garrett BE, Griffiths RR. Physical dependence increases the relative reinforcing effects of caffeine versus placebo. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1998; 139:195-202.
6. Greenwald MK, Hursh SR. Behavioral economic analysis of opioid consumption in heroin-dependent individuals: Effects of unit price and pre-session drug supply. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006; 85:35-48.
7. Little C, Correia CJ. Use of multiple-choice procedurewith college student drinkers. Psychol Addict Behav 2006; 20:445-452.
8. Schmitz JM, Sayre SL, Hokanson PS, Spiga R. Assessment of the relative reinforcement value of smoking and drinking using a multiple-choice measurement strategy. Nicotine Tob Res 2003; 5:729-734.
9. Brookoff D, Rotondo MF, Shaw LM, Campbell EA, Fields L. Cocaethylene levels in patients who test positive for cocaine. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27:316-320.
10. Heil SH, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. Alcohol dependence among cocaine-dependent outpatients: Demographics, drug use, treatment outcome and other characteristics. J Stud Alcohol 2001; 62:14-22.
11. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Cacciola J, Griffith J, Evans F, Barr HL, O'Brian CP. New data from the Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis 1985; 173:412-423.
12. Skinner HA, Horn JL. Alcohol Dependence Scale: User's Guide. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1984.
13. Harris DS, Everhart ET, Mendelson J, Jones RT. The pharmacology of cocaethylene in humans following cocaine and ethanol administration. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003; 72:169-182.
14. Magura S, Rosenblum A. Modulating effect of alcohol use on cocaine use. Addict Behav 2000; 25:117-122.
15. Schuh KJ, Griffiths RR. Caffeine reinforcement: The role of withdrawal. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1997; 130:320-326.