Use of a multiple-choice procedure with college student drinkers

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 445-452

  Correia, Christopher J ^a   Little, Carrie ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Choice behavior; College students; Multiple Choice Procedure; Reinforcement; Young adults

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MONEY; MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLISM; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; RISK FACTORS; STATISTICS; STUDENTS;

EID: 33845787019     PISSN: 0893164X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.4.445     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baker, F., Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2003). Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: Similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 382-392.
2. Bickel, W. K., & Marsch, L. A. (2001). Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: Delay discounting processes. Addiction, 96, 73-86.
3. Bigelow, G. E., Griffiths, R. R., & Liebson, I. A. (1977). Pharmacological influences upon ethanol self-administration. In M. M. Gross (Ed.), Alcohol intoxication and withdrawal (Vol. IIIB, pp. 523-538). New York: Plenum Press.
4. Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2000). Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 728-733.
5. Chutuape, M. A., Silverman, K., & Stitzer, M. L. (1998). Survey assessment of methadone treatment services as reinforcers. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 24, 1-16.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Collins, R. L., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 189-200.
8. Correia, C. J., Benson, T. A., & Carey, K. B. (2005). Decreased substance use following increases in alternative behaviors: A preliminary investigation. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 19-27.
9. Correia, C. J., Carey, K. B., & Borsari, B. (2002). Measuring substance-free and substance-related reinforcement in the natural environment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 28-34.
10. Correia, C. J., Carey, K. B., Simons, J., & Borsari, B. (2003). Relationships between binge drinking and substance-free reinforcement in a sample of college students: A preliminary investigation. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 361-368.
11. Correia, C. J., Simons, J., Carey, K. B., & Borsari, B. E. (1998). Predicting drug use: Application of behavioral theories of choice. Addictive Behaviors, 23, 705-709.
12. Garrett, B. E., & Griffiths, R. R. (1998). Physical dependence increases the relative reinforcing effects of caffeine versus placebo. Psychopharmacology, 139, 195-202.
13. Griffiths, R. R., Bigelow, G. E., & Liebson, I. A. (1976). Human sedative self-administration: Effects of inter-ingestion interval and dose. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 3, 443-446.
14. Griffiths, R. R., Rush, C. R., & Puhala, K. A. (1996). Validation of the Multiple-Choice Procedure for investigating drug reinforcement in humans. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 4, 96-106.
15. Griffiths, R. R., Troisi, J. R., Silverman, K., Mumford, G. K. (1993). Multiple-choice procedure: An efficient approach for investigating drug reinforcement in humans. Behavioural Pharmacology, 4, 3-13.
16. Higgins, S. T., Heil, S. H., & Plebani-Lussier, J. (2004). Clinical implications of reinforcement as a determinant of substance use disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 431-461.
17. Johnston, L. D., & O'Malley, P. M. (1985). Issues of validity and population coverage in student surveys of drug use. In B. A. Rouse, N. J. Kozel, & L. G. Richards (Eds.), Self report methods of estimating drug use: Meeting current challenges to validity (National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph No. 57, ADM 85-1402). Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
18. Jones, H. E., Garrett, B. E., & Griffiths, R. R. (1999). Subjective and physiological effects of intravenous nicotine and cocaine in cigarette smoking cocaine abusers. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 288, 188-197.
19. Kirby, K. K., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 78-87.
20. Murphy, J. G., Correia, C. J., Colby, S. M., & Vuchinich, R. E. (2005). Using behavioral theories of choice to predict drinking outcomes following a brief intervention. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 13, 93-101.
21. Roll, J. M., Reilly, M. P., & Johanson, C. E. (2000). The influence of exchange delays on cigarette versus money choice: A laboratory analog of voucher-based reinforcement therapy. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 8, 366-370.
22. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2004). Results from the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings (DHHS Publication No. SMA 04-3964, NSDUH Series H-25). Rockville, MD: Author.
23. Tucker, J. A., Vuchinich, R. E., & Rippens, P. D. (2002). Predicting natural resolution of alcohol-related problems: A prospective behavioral economic analysis. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 10, 248-257.
24. Vuchinich, R. E., & Simpson, C. A. (1998). Hyperbolic temporal discounting in heavy and light social drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6, 292-305.
25. Vuchinich, R. E., & Tucker, J. A. (1983). Behavioral theories of choice as a framework for studying drinking behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 408-416.
26. Vuchinich, R. E., & Tucker, J. A. (1996). The molar context of alcohol abuse. In L. Green & J. Kagel (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (Vol. 3, pp. 133-162). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Press.
27. Vuchinich, R. E., Tucker, J. A., & Rudd, E. J. (1987). Preference for alcohol consumption as a function of amount and delay of alternative rewards. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 259-263.
28. Wechsler, H., Lee, J. E., Kuo, M., & Lee, H. (2000). College binge drinking in the 1990s: A continuing problem. Journal of American College Health, 48, 199-210.
29. White, H. R., & Labouvie, E. W. (1989). Towards an assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50, 30-37.