Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 800-810

  Ma, Nan ^a   Guan, Jiancheng ^b   Zhao, Yi ^c  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Citation network; Internal Citations; PageRank

Indexed keywords

SEARCH ENGINES; WEBSITES;

CITATION ANALYSIS; CITATION NETWORK; INTERNAL CITATIONS;

DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 39649120552     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson A. Molecular biology: US juggernaut overwhelms divided European elite. Science 256 (1992) 460-464
2. Anon. Top 50 research institutions in molecular biology ranked by citation impact 1981-1991. Science Watch 3 7 (1992)
3. Bollen J., Rodriguez M.A., and van de Sompel H. Journal status. Scientometrics 69 3 (2006) 669-687
4. Bonacich P. Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology 92 5 (1987) 1170-1182
5. Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Retrieved May 22, 2006. Available from http://www.db.stanford.edu/pub/papers/google.pdf.
6. Chen, P., Xie, H., Maslov, S., & Redner, S. (2006). Finding scientific gems with Google. Retrieved May 22, 2006. Available from http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0604130.
7. Chubin D.E., and Hackett E.J. Peerless science: Peer review and US science policy (1990), State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
8. Cohen R., Havlin S., and ben-Avranham D. Structural properties of scale-free networks (2002), Wiley-VCH Verlag, Berlin
9. Dalpé R. Biliometric analysis of biotechnology. Scientometrics 55 2 (2002) 189-213
10. Garfield E. Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (1979), Wiley, New York, NY
11. Garfield E. How to use citation analysis for faculty evaluations, and when is it relevant? (Part 1). Current Contents 44 (1983) 5-13
12. Glänzel W. The needs for standards in bibliometric research and technology. Scientometrics 35 (1996) 167-176
13. Guan J.C., and Ma N. A comparative study of research performance in computer science. Scientometrics 61 (2004) 339-359
14. Herbertz H., and Müller-Hill B. Quality and efficiency of basic research in molecular biology: A bibliometric analysis of thirteen excellent research institutes. Research Policy 24 (1995) 959-979
15. He T., Zhang J., and Teng L. Basic research in biochemistry and molecular biology in China: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 62 2 (2005) 249-259
16. Kleinberg J. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM 46 5 (1999) 604-632
17. Koenig M.E.D. Determinants of expert judgment of research performance. Scientometrics 4 (1982) 361-378
18. Koenig M.E.D. Bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 34 (1983) 136-145
19. Kostoff R.N. Performance measures for government-sponsored research: Overview and background. Scientometrics 36 (1996) 281-292
20. Lawani S.M., and Bayer A.E. Validity of citation criteria for assessing the influence of scientific publications: New evidence with peer assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 34 (1983) 59-66
21. Martin B.R. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics 36 (1996) 343-362
22. Moed H.F. Measuring China's research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 53 3 (2002) 81-96
23. Narin F. Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity (1976), Computer Horizons, Cherry Hill, NJ
24. Narin F., and Hamilton K.S. Bibliometric performance measures. Scientometrics 36 (1996) 293-310
25. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., & Winograd, T. (1998). The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Retrieved May 22, 2006. Available from http://dbpubs.stanford.edu/pub/1999-66.
26. Pendlebury D. Cold Spring Harbor tops among independent labs. Scientist (1990) 20
27. Pinski G., and Narin F. Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with applications to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management 12 5 (1976) 297-312
28. Redner S. How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physics Journal B 4 (1998) 131-134
29. Snyder H., and Rosenbaum H. Can search engines be used for web-link analysis? A critical review. Journal of Documentation 55 4 (1999) 375-384
30. Thomas P.R., and Watkins D.S. Institutional research rankings via bibliometric analysis and direct peer review: A comparative case study with policy implications. Scientometrics 41 (1998) 335-355
31. van Raan A.F.J. Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer-review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics 36 (1996) 397-420
32. van Raan A.F.J. Scientometrics: State of the art. Scientometrics 38 (1997) 205-218
33. Vázquez, A. (2001). Statistics of citation network. Retrieved June 13, 2006. Available from http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0105031.
34. Zhou P., and Leydesdoff L. The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy 35 1 (2006) 83-104