A comparative study of research performance in computer science

Scientometrics

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 339-359

  Guan, Jiancheng ^a   Ma, Nan ^a  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 6344221527     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045114.85737.1b     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. AJIFERUKE, I., BURRELL, Q., TAGUE, J. (1988), Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research, Scientometrics, 14: 421-433.
2. Annual Report of Science and Technology Development of China (By Research Group on Development and Strategy of S&T of China, 2002), Beijing: Economic Management Publishing House (in Chinese), 148-152.
3. ARUNACHALAM, S., SINGH, U. N., SINHA, R. (1993), The sleeping dragon wakes up: A scientometric analysis of the growth of science and the usage of journals in China, Current Science, 65: 809-822.
4. BORDONS, M., FERNANDEZ, M. T., GOMEZ, I. (2002), Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country, Scientometrics, 53 (2): 195-206.
5. BRAUN, T., SCHUBERT, A., GLÄNZEL, W. (1985), Scientometric Indicators: A 32 Countries Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Performance and Citation Impact. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
6. BRAUN, T., GLÄNZEL, W., SCHUBERT, A. (1990), Publication productivity: From frequency distributions to scientometric indicators, Journal of Information Science, 16: 37-44.
7. CARPENTER, M. P., NARIN, F. (1981), The adequacy of the Science Citation Index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity, Journal of American Society for Information Science, 32: 430-439.
8. EGGHE, L., ROUSSEAU, R. (2002) A general frame-work for relative impact indicators, Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 27 (1): 29-48.
9. FRAME, J. D. (1977) Mainstream research in Latin America and Caribbean, Interciencia, 2: 143-198.
10. FRAME, J. D., NARIN, F. (1987), The growth of Chinese Scientific research 1973-84, Scientometrics, 12: 135-144.
11. GARG, K. C. (2002), Scientometrics of laser research in India and China, Scientometrics, 55 (1): 71-85.
12. GARG, K. C., DUTT, B. (1992), Bibliometrics of Indian Science as reflected through Science Citation Index, Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 51: 329-340.
13. GARG, K. C., PADHI, P. (1998), Scientometrics study of laser patent literature, Scientometrics, 43: 443-454.
14. GARG, K. C., PADHI, P. (1999), Scientometrics of laser research literature as viewed through the Journal of Current Laser Abstract, Scientometrics, 45: 251-268.
15. GARG, K. C., PADHI, P. (2001), A study of collaboration in laser science and technology, Scientometrics, 50 (2): 415-427.
16. GARG, K. C., PADHI, P. (2002), Scientometrics of laser research in India during 1970-1994, Scientometrics, 55 (2): 215-241.
17. GUAN, J. C., WANG, J. X. (2004), Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency, Scientometrics, 59 (1): 131-155.
18. IRVINE, J., MARTIN, B., PEACOCK, T., TURNER, R. (1985), Charting the decline in British science, Nature, 316: 587-590.
19. International Information Service in Physics, Electro-technology, Computer Control [DB/OL], http://www.ovid.com
20. Journal Citation Report, ISI, http://www.webofkonwledge.com
21. KING, J. (1989), A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation, Journal of Information Science, 13: 261-276.
22. KARKI, M. M. S., GARG, K. C. (1997), Bibliometrics of Alkaloid Chemistry research in India, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 37: 157-161.
23. LU, Q., LAZONICK, W. (2001), The organisation of innovation in a transitional economy: business and government in Chinese electronic publishing, Research Policy, 30: 55-77.
24. MAY, R. M., (1997), The scientific wealth of nations, Science, 275 (5301): 793-796.
25. NAGPAUL, P. S. (1995), Contribution of Indian university to the mainstream scientific literature: A bibliometric assessment, Scientometrics, 32: 11-36.
26. NARIN, F., FRAME, J.D. (1989), The growth of Japanese science and technology, Science, 245: 600-605.
27. PRICE, D. DE. S. (1981), The analysis of scientometric metrics for policy implications, Scientometrics, 3: 47-54.
28. PRICE, D. DE. S., BEAVER, D. DE. B. (1966), Collaboration in an invisible college, American Psychologist, 3: 1011.
29. VAN RAAN, A. F. J., Bibliometric indicators as research performance evaluation tools, In: Proceedings of the European University Institute Conference on 'Research Management in Europe Today', Florence, 13-15 December 1990.
30. REN, S., ROUSSEAU, R., (2002), International visibility of Chinese scientific journals, Scientometrics, 53 (3): 389-405.
31. SCHUBERT, A., BRAUN, T. (1986) Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact, Scientometrics, 9: 281-291.
32. SEN, B. K. (1992), Normalized Impact Factor, J. Documentation, 48: 318-329.
33. VAN LEEUWEN, TH. N., MOED, H. F., REEDIJK, J. (1999), Critical comments on Institute for Scientific Information impact factors: a sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals, Journal of Information Science, 25 (6): 489-498.
34. ZHANG, H. Q., ZHANG, Y. H. (1997), Scientometric study on research performance in China, Information Processing & Management, 33 (1): 81-89.