The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology

Scientometrics

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 167-176

  Glanzel W ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^b Res Assoc Sci Commun Info e V   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039788042     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02018475     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. P. WEINGART, Der Forschungsindex, Bild der Wissenschaft, 5 (1993) 32-39.
2. H. MOED, R.E. DE BRUIN, A.J. NEDERHOF, A.F.J. VAN RAAN, R.J.W. TIJSSEN, State of Art Bibliometric Macro-indicators. An Overview of Demand and Supply. Office for Official Publications of the European Community, Luxembourg, 1992.
3. D.A. PENDLEBURY, Germany: East, West, One. Will reunification bring on a surge or slump in science? Science Watch, 1 (1990) 1-2.
4. W. GLÄNZEL, U. SCHOEPFLIN, Little scientometrics, big scientometrics... and beyond? Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 375-384.
5. A. SCHUBERT, H. MACZELKA, Cognitive changes in scientometrics during the 1980s, as reflected by the reference patterns of its core journal, Social Studies of Science, 23 (1993) 571-581.
6. T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT, Scientometrics Indicators. A 32-country Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Performance and Citation Impact. World Scientific, Singapore, Philadelphia. 1985.
7. T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, The sweet and sour of journal citation rates. On a source of error in computing journal impact factors, Chemical Intelligencer, (1995) 31-32.