Scientometrics: State-of-the-art

Scientometrics

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 205-218

  Van Raan, A F J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001046447     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02461131     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT, Scientometric indicator datafiles. A multidimensional machine readable database for evaluative purposes. Scientometrics, 28 (1993) 137-150.
2. A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 397-420.
3. L. EGGHE, Bridging the gaps: Conceptual discussions on informetrics, Scientometrics, 30(1994) 35-48.
4. F. NARIN, K. S. HAMILTON, D. OLIVASTRO, Linkage between agency-supported research and patented industrial technology, Research Evaluation, (1996) to be published.
5. G. LEWISON, Publications from the European Community's Biotechnology Action Programme (BAP): Multi-nationality, acknowledgement of support, and citations, Scientometrics, 31 (1994) 125-142.
6. H. F. MOED, R. E. DE BRUIN, TH. N. VAN LEEUWEN, New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications, Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 381-422.
7. I. GABOLDE, Opening address to the First Int. Conf. on the Evaluation of Research, Technology and Development, Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 317-320.
8. R. N. KOSTOFF, Federal research impact assessment: Axioms, approaches, applications, Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 163-206.
9. S. COZZENS, U. S. research assessment: Recent developments, Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 351-362.
10. W. A. SMITH, Evaluating research, technology and development in Canadian industry: Meeting the challenges of industrial innovation, Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 527-539.
11. W. GLÄNZEL, U. SCHOEPFLIN, Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ... and beyond? Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 375-384.
12. H. E. ROOSENDAAL, Roles of bibliometrics in scientific communication, Research Evaluation, (1996) to be published.
13. R. J. W. TIJSSEN, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Mapping changes in science and technology: bibliometric cooccurrence analysis of the R&D literature. Evaluation Review, 18 (1994) 98-115.
14. W. GLÄNZEL, The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology, Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 167-176.
15. H. F. MOED, Differences in the construction of SCI based bibliometric indicators among various producers: A first overview, Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 177-192.
16. J. S. KATZ, Bibliometric standards: Personal experience and lessons learned, Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 193-198.
17. K. DEBACKERE, B. CLARYSSE, Advanced bibliometric methods to model the relationship between entry-behavior and networking in emerging technological communities, Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS), (1996) to be published.
18. H. MOXHAM, J. ANDERSON, Peer review: a view from the inside, Science and Technology Policy, (1992) 7-15.
19. A. J. NEDERHOF, E. C. M. NOYONS, International comparison of departments' research performance in the humanities, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (JASIS), 43 (1992) 249-256.
20. M. ZITT, F. PERROT, R. BARRÉ, The transition from 'national' to 'transnational' model and related measures of countries' performance, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (JASIS), (1996) to be published.
21. H. GRUPP, U. SCHMOCH, K. KOSCHATZKY, Science and technology infrastructure in Baden-Württemberg and its orientation toward future regional development, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (JASIS), (1996) to be published.