Teachers' perspectives and contextual dimensions to guide the design of N.C. history learning objects and ontology

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 635-646

  Pattuelli, Maria Cristina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital libraries; History education; Information needs; Learning Objects; Ontologies; User centered design

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; ONTOLOGY;

IN-DEPTH UNDERSTANDING; LEARNING OBJECTS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 39649085349     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Afzal W. An argument for the increased use of qualitative research in LIS. Emporia State Research Studies 43 1 (2006) 22-25
2. Bloom, N. E., & Stout, C. (2005). Using digitized primary source materials in the classroom: A Colorado case study. First Monday, 10(6). Available from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_6/bloom/index.html; Accessed 20 October 2006.
3. Bolick C., Hicks D., Lee J., Molebash P., and Doolittle P. Digital libraries: The catalyst to transform teacher education. AACE Journal 12 2 (2004) 198-217
4. Borgman C.L., Millwood K.A., Finley J.R., Champeny L., Gilliland-Swetland A.J., and Leazer G.H. Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research: Implications for the design of digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56 6 (2005) 636-657
5. Cantu D.A., and Wilson J.W. Teaching history in the digital classroom (2003), M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY
6. Carr, R. (2006). What users want: An academic 'hybrid' library perspective. Ariadne, 46(July). Available from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue46/carr/; Accessed 19 October 2006.
7. Clarke G.W., and Lee J.K. The promise of digital history in the teaching of local history. The Clearing House 78 2 (2004) 84-87
8. Coleman, A., & Sumner, T. (2004). Digital libraries and user needs: Negotiating the future. Journal of Digital Information, 5(3). Available from http://jodi.tamu.edu/Articles/v05/i03/editorial/; Accessed 20 October 2006.
9. Corcho O. Ontology based document annotation: Trends and open research problems. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 1 1 (2006) 47-57
10. Coventry M., and Bass R. Engines of inquiry: Approaches to teaching, learning & technology in American culture studies. 2nd ed. (2003), American Crossroads Project, Washington, DC
11. Crane, G., (2006). What do you do with a million books?. D-Lib Magazine, 12(3). Available from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march06/crane/03crane.html; Accessed 12 October 2006.
12. Feldman, S., (2000). Uproar over testing. American Federation of Teachers (AFT), (July). Available from http://www.aft.org/presscenter/speeches-columns/wws/2000/0700.htm; Accessed 15 October 2006.
13. Govindasamy T. Successful implementation of E-learning: Pedagogical considerations. Internet and Higher Education 4 3-4 (2002) 287-299
14. Harley, D., Henke, J., Lawrence, S., Miller, I., & Perciali, I. N. D., (2006). Use and users of digital resources: A focus on undergraduate education in the humanities and social sciences. Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley. Paper CSHE-11-06. Available from http://repositories.cdlib.org/cshe/CSHE-11-06; Accessed 19 October 2006.
15. Hewitt J.A. Keep up the good work(s). Readers comments on the documenting the American south (2002), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Library, Chapel Hill, NC
16. IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee, (2002). Learning Object Metadata (LOM), final draft standard. No. IEE 1484.12.1-2002. Available from http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf; Accessed 30 September 2006.
17. Kalinichenko, L. A. (coordinating author). (2003). Digital libraries in education: Analytical survey. Moscow: UNESCO Institute.
18. Kobrin D. Beyond the textbook: Teaching history using documents and primary sources (1996), Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH
19. Lee J.K. Digital history in the History/Social studies classroom. The History Teacher 35 4 (2002) 503-517
20. Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (in press). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers and Education.
21. Library of Congress (1995). A periodic report from the National Digital Library Program. Report No. 4, November/December 1995. Available from http://www.loc.gov/ndl/nov-dec.html; Accessed 21 September 2006.
22. Madison J. Teaching with images. OAH Magazine of History 18 2 (2004) 65-68
23. McCullough M. Digital ground: Architecture, pervasive computing, and environmental knowing (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
24. Metros S.E. Learning objects: A rose by any other name. Educause Review 40 4 (2005) 12-13
25. Metros S.E., and Bennett K.A. Learning objects in higher education: The sequel. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research (ECAR), Research Bulletin 2004 11 (2004) 1-13
26. National Center for History in the Schools, (1996). National standards for history (Basic ed.). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for History in the Schools, University of California.
27. National Council for the Social Studies, (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: NCSS.
28. Norberg L.R., Vassiliadis K., Ferguson J., and Smith N. Sustainable design for multiple audiences: The usability study and iterative redesign of the documenting the American south digital library. OCLC Systems and Services 21 4 (2005) 285-299
29. Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Technical Report KSL-01-05, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory, March 2001. Available from http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/ontology-tutorial-noy-mcguinness-abstract.html; Accessed 12 October 2006.
30. OCLC E-learning Task Force, (2003). Libraries and the enhancement of E-learning. OCLC Inc. Available from http://www.oclc.org/index/elearning/default.htm; Accessed 19 October 2006.
31. Panitch, J. M. (2006). Digital collections at the University Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. D-Lib Magazine, 12(10). Available from http://www.dlib.org.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/dlib/october06/10featured-collection.html; Accessed 19 October 2006.
32. Pattuelli, M. C., & Norberg, L. R. (2006). Identity matters: Constructing social identities through ontology-based metadata. In International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. Manzanillo, Mexico, 215-219.
33. Pattuelli, M. C., Norberg, L. R., & Smith, N. (2004). Using reusable learning objects and semantic tools to support concept-based teaching of the American South. Poster Presented at the 2004 European Conference on Digital Libraries, Bath, UK. Available from http://www.ecdl2004.org/posters-demos.html; Accessed 30 September 2006.
34. Recker M.M., Dorward J., and Nelson L.M. Discovery and use of online learning resources: Case study findings. Educational Technology and Society 7 2 (2004) 93-104
35. Recker, M. M., Dorward, J., Dawson, D., Halioris, S., Liu, Y., & Mao, X., et al. (2005). You can lead a horse to water: Teacher development and use of digital library resources. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2005). Denver, CO, USA, 1-8.
36. Risinger F.C. Two different worlds: The dilemma facing social studies teachers. Social Education 66.4 (2002) 231-233
37. Sampson, D. G., Lytras, M., Wagner, G., & Diaz, P. (Eds.) (2004). Ontologies and the semantic web for E-learning. Special issue of the Educational Technology and Society, 7(4), 1-225.
38. Shreeves, S. L., & Kirkham, C. M. (2004). Experiences of educators using a portal of aggregated metadata. Journal of Digital Information, 5(3), 2004-2009. Available from http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v05/i03/Shreeves/; Accessed 20 October 2006.
39. Sicilia M. Metadata, semantics, and ontology: Providing meaning to information resources. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 1 1 (2006) 83-86
40. Solomon P. Discovering information in context. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36 (2002) 229-264
41. Sumner, T., Khoo, M., Recker, M. M., & Marlino, M. (2003). Understanding educator perceptions of "quality" in digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Houston, Texas, 269-279.
42. Tally B., and Goldenberg L.B. Fostering historical thinking with digitized primary sources. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 38 1 (2005) 2-21
43. Thomas N.P., and Nyce J.M. Context as category: opportunities for ethnographic analysis in library and information science research. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research 2 (2001) 105-118
44. University of California Bibliographic Services Task Force Report, (2005). Rethinking how we provide bibliographic services for the University of California. Available from http://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/sopag/BSTF/Final.pdf; Accessed 30 September 2006.
45. Uschold M., and Gruninger M. Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11 2 (1996) 93-155
46. van Kasteren, J. (2003). Bridging the gap between catalogue and course. An interview with Miguel Rodriguez Artacho. DigiCULT Thematic Issue 4: Learning Objects from Cultural and Scientific Heritage Resources. Available from http://www.digicult.info/downloads/digicult_thematicissue4_hres.pdf; Accessed 19 October 2006.
47. Vannatta R.A., and Fordham N. Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 36 3 (2004) 253-272
48. Wiley, D. A. (2003). Learning objects: Difficulties and opportunities. Available from http://opencontent.org/docs/lo_do.pdf; Accessed 19 October 2006.